Jump to content

Steel Magnolia

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

  • Feedback


Posts posted by Steel Magnolia

  1. On 10/10/2021 at 7:02 PM, ICouldntThinkOfOne said:

    Sweetie, we now know that Britney was fighting against the conservatorship since its inception, with huge denials of her rights in 2014 and 2016, as well as the prioritisation of profit over her health in 2012 i.e X-Factor.

    Between all of the collaborations and connections she had, no one spoke out and anyone who rocked the boat was removed; that's established fact.

    How much benefit of the doubt are you giving Cade, in regards to Rosengart? Since her testimony? When the court only then agreed to give her her own council due to the hearing being public?

    Ultimately, Britney deserves all the recognition, but let's not pretend that her speaking out had nothing to do with public attention and support, coming from documentaries that sided with her, that were created due to fans, supporters and activists scouring document and attending hearings, and pressure on social media. Its well established that Team Con didn't know to handle Free Britney developments because it was beyond their control.

    I mean frankly, the fact that Jamie was fighting to pay "media matters" should say it all; this was played out in public.


    On 10/11/2021 at 4:47 AM, Easy There said:

    Yikes lol

    Sweetie, Britney's moves have been very strategic going all the way back to 2018.

    Just because Rosengart was approved by the court on a particular date doesn't mean that he wasn't advising her (or those close to her) on the sly in the background.

    Again, we know virtually nothing about how Rosengart came on board...If fans really had the power to influence the courts as much as they've been patting themselves on the back for, it sure wouldn't have taken Ingham eight months to file a document to bring Bessemer on board...And if fans really had the power to influence the courts as much as they've been patting themselves on the back for, the conservatorship would have been terminated long ago. :smokney_britney_smoke_cigarette_chaotic_2004_exhale_blow:


    • Like 1
  2. 2 minutes ago, Xavierleleon said:

    That is very judgemental and she has been kidnapped and silenced all this time, and deliberately portrayed to the world as “crazy”. I can’t say I have proof of who is posting on Jamie’s account that Crowdsurf runs, but it seems em, not that mature to assume straight away what you see on that page would be Britney’s work. 
    Also it doesn’t look less mature than ANY other celebrity’s in Hollywood. I mean Madonna, Gwen Stefani, both acting like they are 14 years old, that OITNB actress, forgot her name, the tall one with the podcast and makeup on the show. She does nothing else but post pictures of her butt in a thong and dancing around in a bikini in her kitchen…

    You probably shouldn't get so wound up over a random stranger's opinion on the Internet, eh?

    Opinions are like *********. We all have them. 

    • Like 1
  3. Something fans don't want to accept is that Britney is not very mature for her age.

    And why would she be? It's completely understandable.

    This is likely the reason they kept such tight control of her social media for the past 13 years...To protect the brand.

    They went too far with it...And now she's going to have to begin to learn some hard lessons.

    They protected her too much, and for too long.

    • Love 4
    • Like 3
  4. 5 hours ago, rennen said:

    Britney's attorney, Mathew Rosengart, is actively working to depose Jamie, Taylor and Robin to determine if they committed malfeasance or misappropriation of assets. He also wants to get to the bottom on whether they illegally recorded or eavesdropped on Britney's bedroom conversations and private phone conversations / text messages. br-relb.jpg.74548da2503eb6b46c6975ea1691f11c.jpg


    Get their depositions on the court record and then file to terminate.

    That is a great legal strategy!

    • Love 1
    • Like 2
  5. 30 minutes ago, Frankie8 said:

    I always thought the no sweets/soda rule was so that she wouldn't be overstimulated and be on a sugar high. Jamie said she is like a racehorse, so the sugar high might cause her to get too active and hard to control, like kids on a sugar high, but with her having that supposed racehorse type personality it is double hard to calm her.

    Yes I know this sounds ridiculous, but his whole control freak factor is ridiculous.

    I thought it was to help control her weight and keep her fit.

    Like a racehorse would be trained.

  6. 1 hour ago, Illegally EATEN said:

    He was however referred to the music video by an associate of Lou Taylor, who happened to be his friend. So there was a little something more going on there.

    Who was the friend?

    Either way...

    The vast majority of the fanbase didn't clue in to what an heinous monster Lou M. Taylor was until, what...2019?

    Can we really blame Sam for not seeing that one coming, either?

    • Love 1
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block