Jump to content

DuranDuran

Spark
  • Posts

    855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DuranDuran

  1. The same author, Eileen Reslin, wrote this article in 2019: And this: So, yeah, this author isn't trustworthy!
  2. Dunno, but, according to Maxi, they're really close. It's a little strange for me that Maxi constantly speaks for Britney, for Sam. And it makes you wonder, if Sam didn't like it, wouldn't he have asked Maxi long ago to stop talking about them.
  3. And for everyone who tries to justify Sam by using the argument that maybe Sam was also threatened to keep his mouth shut otherwise he would lose Britney. You need to stop and think that had Britney died, he would have lost her forever. Britney herself said that she could not think of any other reason other than that they were trying to kill her . Moreover, team con changed her will a year or so before and wrote themselves there as inheritors. What does this tell us? +There are also a lot of people in team Con who were involved in MJ's case.
  4. Okay, was then Sam's bestie, Maxi, threatened too? Cuz in 2019 Maxi said to fans that Britney would never be fully out of the cship and we should move on. He also said that Brit was lucky to have someone as patient as Sam, because she has "issues". In 2020 Maxi said in CalaBabes' podcast something akin to 'Britney doesn't need Cship, but she has no intention to end it (she just fights to make some changes, but not to end it completely), cuz she has been in it for more than 10 years and has been convinced that she needs it'... Here is the video where he said it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjE85Og2AQs&t=1660s (First time Maxi talked about it at 30:29 and then he started talking about it again at 33:20 till 34:42) And it's not hard to guess who fed Maxi the info. The narrative they were leading was very dangerous! And we know for a fact that Sam's bestie was lying. Because NY times articles revealed that Britney had fought at least since 2014 to end the Cship. Plus CNN article revealed that Britney asked to end the Cship at the hearing in 2019: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/16/entertainment/britney-spears-conservatorship/index.html - btw, LFB had a somewhat similar narrative that Britney might not want to end Cship once her father is out of the picture. - P.S. I will be glad if it turns out that I am wrong, but Sam provided us with many reasons to be suspicious of him.
  5. I will be glad if it turns out that I am wrong, but many fans, including me, don't question Sam for no reason. In fact, he provided us with many reasons to be wary of him and his motives. 1. His story about college and football team, it's a bs Source: https://huskercorner.com/2018/07/18/nebraska-football-britney-spears/ 2. The NewYorker article implied that whoever was a threat to Cship was immediately removed from Britney's life. Sam's with her since 2016. (https://www.newyorker.com/news/american-chronicles/britney-spears-conservatorship-nightmare) 3. Sam was doing a full damage control for team con when Britney was held against her will in the facility. It's hard for me to turn a blind eye to it, especially after we heard/read Britney's testimony and what she went through there. - he liked infamous "me time" post and shared it on his insta stories - made the following post on his instagram: which resulted in a bunch of articles supporting team con's narrative. Ex.: - spoke to TMZ and said "she's doing amazing", "nobody needs to worry" while Brit was at the facility. Here's a video: - pretended they were on a date when Britney was at the facility, further promoting the narrative that the situation was not dire, that we didn't need to worry But it was more than dire! Plus his lies сould have helped quell the movement. Thank goodness the fans didn't take his word for it. 4. The narrative that Sam's bestie, Maxi, ran. And it's not hard to guess who fed Maxi the info. - in 2019 Maxi said to fans that Britney would never be fully out of the cship and we should move on. He also said that Brit was lucky to have someone as patient as Sam, because she has "issues". - in 2020 Maxi said something akin to 'Britney doesn't need Cship, but she has no intention to end it (she just fights to make some changes, but not to end it completely), cuz she has been in it for more than 10 years and has been convinced that she needs it'... And guess what, LFB had a somewhat similar narrative that Britney might not want to end Cship once her father is out of the picture. Here is the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjE85Og2AQs&t=1660s (First time Maxi talked about it at 30:29 and then he started talking about it again at 33:20 till 34:42) And we know for a fact that Sam's bestie was lying. Because NY times articles revealed that Britney had fought at least since 2014 to end the Cship. Plus CNN article revealed that Britney asked to end the Cship at the hearing in 2019: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/16/entertainment/britney-spears-conservatorship/index.html ------- So, yeah, we do have reasons to be suspicious of Sam. And since some fans like to gaslight using the next argument. I'll say right away that no, I don't think Britney's stupid. But we must understand that she is a survivor of abuse and how it may have impacted the psyche.
  6. I doubt it is her, since there is not a single chance that the paparazzi would follow /go after Sam with camera and not her, if it really was Britney in his car. All the attention would be on her
  7. Dunno... But neither Britney nor Aaliyah was the first to use snakes. Many have done it before them:
  8. No, it's not true. Aaliyah was supposed to present the award, not perform (https://www.mtv.com/news/1447873/jay-z-linkin-park-performing-bsb-presenting-at-vmas/). Plus Britney's performance was in development for several weeks before the VMA was aired.
  9. Actually it was LFB who began to push this alleged info to the masses. I think it was during the end of 2020 - early 2021, after FreeBritneyLA and Britney's Gram Girls posted information that it was LFB who allegedly hacked into the 2020 hearing that Britney was supposed to attend remotely.
  10. I'll add it here to balance Brian's egotism a bit as not only the choreography made this performance iconic https://www.designweek.co.uk/issues/6-12-september-2021/stufish-britney-spears-vmas/
  11. I'm from the camp who doesn't believe Britney's in control of her IG. I mean, obviously she provides some material, so she has some kind of input, but since she does not post directly, it leaves open the possibility for team con to censor her and/or edit her captions/videos... And I will never believe that they don't use her IG for their own agenda, as it is a very powerful tool for pushing needed narrative forward. Moreover, legally, they will not violate anything by doing it. And her Instagram belongs to BRITNEY BRANDS, which has her father as the boss. But despite the fact that I have great doubts that Britney's in control of her social networks, it still infuriates me when people is like " just look at her instagram, something must be wrong with her"... cuz, regardless of who posts on her IG, I truly don't see there something that can be really considered even remotely unhinged/alarming. I may not like or agree with some of the posts on her IG, but to find it unhinged? No, not at all. So I agree with you that it would be great to change the narrative around her IG and be ready to use the #freebritney movement to attack anyone the moment they even try to use any post against her, but I don think it's really possible cuz we are too heterogeneous. Also, sadly, a lot of people do not know how to think for themselves, so it is easy to put other people's thoughts in their heads. And her Instagram does not work separately, it works in conjunction with ****ty media that helps to put certain thoughts in people's heads to push specific narrative.
  12. No, not quite right. Backgrid is a paparazzi agency, along with Splash News, and both are known exactly for staged 'encounters'.
  13. This! Plus, photos were taken by BACKGRID. Team con hires this firm all the time for staged photos! I'm sorry Sam's lovers, but I'm personally done with his BS. I'm not on the fence anymore in regards to him.
  14. Seems Britney dodged a bullet, problems could arise not because of Jason per se, but because of the law firm that was supposed to represent him... Though the information that Rubin tried to place his mother under Cship, using a diagnosis of the doctor who is known as the go-to “buy a diagnosis guy” in Vegas + who did not even personally meet with Jason's mother, it's all very disturbing.
  15. Actually, there is a high probability that team con uses the services of paid bots. + we know that positive comments were/are being deleted...
  16. So, yeah, I believe that when Adam says **** like 'she knew she could not avoid a c-ship', he's just trying to protect his reputation and his ****ty strategy. Cuz for ex., with John Eardley she immediately began to fight to terminate the Cship.
  17. Corruption at its finest. I guess this was the reason why he advised her not to resist. He most likely realized, that they won't let a such high-profile prey off the hook easily, if they already set their eyes on her. So I suppose his strategy was for Britney to play nice and be cooperative in order for the court to make some modifications in her favor. And this is most likely also the reason why he gave up on Brit so quickly, he did not want to risk his career and connections.
  18. In the podcast, Adam said that Britney did not want Cship, but he was the one, as I understood from his words, who suggested a strategy where 1) she will not resist Cship, cuz it will be difficult to oppose; 2) they will not let the father to be the one in control; 3) then they will gradually try to remove the restrictions and ultimately terminate the Cship ... and she accepted his strategy. Here's the podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/id1460055316?i=1000514181562 1) 16:42 Q: Britney didn't consent to this Cship, did she? A: She didn't 2) 19:22 -22:47 where he said that he was the one who advised her not to resist and etc. And that she was able to take his advice - So, yeah, Adam contradicts himself a bit. And an interesting detail from which he really tries to distance himself, he gave up on Britney before there was an official medical report. It is a fact.
  19. In this case (and many others) it's Lutfi who is full of sh-t. Though maybe he meant the magazine US Weekly itself, and not her personally + she started working for US Weekly only in 2017. Anyway, she is one of the few tabloid journalists who is pro-Britney and who wrote in her articles over the past 13 years that Britney always wanted to end her Cship. Here is her thread as proof:
  20. I hope too, but I have a suspicion that higher-ups for US Weekly may not give the green light for a story like that... There was info that Larry and Jeff has many connections among tabloid magazines, so tabloids often did/do not publish information beneficial for Britney and harmful for Team con.
  21. Or maybe he had been lied by team con. There is a high possibility, that they punished her by taking her dogs away, and for her kids, they came up with a reason that she neglected dogs. She has a day-to-day dog sitter and walker, and many other staff members in her house , so I really have a hard time believing that the dogs were being neglected (left in a cage, not fed, etc.).
  22. This! 100% this! Team con wants to push her over the edge... I mean, they planned a 5150 hold behind Britney's back mere days before her testimony on 14 july, but Brit found a good lawyer on time and Jodi quickly backtracked and the plan fell apart.
  23. Something doesn't add up in this story... I mean, Brit has a dog sitter... don't they get paid to watch the dogs? And pets unfortunately get sick, but this does not mean that they are neglected. Her son can be simply misinformed... Team con took the dogs away from her as punishment in the past as well. I'm speculating, but there is a high probability that they told her kids that they took her dogs because she neglects them. They can't just say we are punishing her, right? they need to come up with a reason. We always need to keep in mind that it is beneficial for team con to keep her in a negative light. And she has a dog sitter and walker, so I kinda have a hard time believing that the dogs were being neglected.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block