Jump to content

Nicole0519

Spark
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Nicole0519's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • One Year In
  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

2

Reputation

  1. https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2021/2021_02456.htm Lawsuit with Kesha for y’all to see and read/go through!
  2. I was able to find this, it is however giving me a headache. I got stressed out by the 5th paragraph when they started throwing in the word “hyperbole” and keshas defamatory remarks against lucasz. But here’s the link to the non-edited lawsuit I believe https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2021/2021_02456.htm
  3. Yes!! It was GRL, originally they were the members that had broken off from the *****cat dolls, but after all kinds of unnecessary drama and switching girls in and out, GRL was formed. Simone Battle hung herself in 2014. Larry Rudolph wasn’t directly involved other than being their manager. Apparently she got deeply depressed over money and worrying the group wasn’t going to be able to break onto the US charts. (They did alright overseas) and GRL is actually back? 2021 they are apparently back, new lineup of girls but they’re going to give it a shot? I guess? Lucky us?
  4. Are they just going to glaze over the fact that she was involuntarily committed because dear ol’ dad said she had early signs of early on-set dementia?!?! Or whatever the legit wording is on the filed court doc. Bye WHY is that not being addressed?!?! You’d think it would be obvious at this point that Jamie did all of this on purpose, and just the mere fact of hospitalizing Britney under false pretenses, sitting her dementia paperwork, I mean this a lot more serious than millions of dollars. Malpractice/Conspiracy to commit malpractice/etc. jamie should have to pay back every single penny. Basically every single person she came into contact with from 2009 until now, should be thoroughly investigated.
  5. https://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/handbook.pdf if you go to page 5-17 under “assets not part of the conservatorship” going solely off of this, does this mean technically Jamie had no right to touch any of her money? I’m confused a little bit, I know that; but did they decide and agree on all the terms of her conservatorship? I would think not, so if this is the law, whats really going on??
  6. “Governed by Kevin”? She is hardly governed by Kevin. Her son has a restraining order against her father and since her father was always around she’s not able to see the kids.
  7. It says “denied without prejudice” which means that the judge is denying it now, which means he wouldn’t be in charge. It also means that if they can come up with a better case as for why then they can re file. But the paperwork says right there “denied without prejudice” so no, the filing is not putting him in charge. It’s denying him being put in charge for now.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block