Jump to content

Newrie

Spark
  • Posts

    351
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Newrie's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Very Popular Rare
  • Reacting Well
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

698

Reputation

  1. How is that relevant? Did your dad hit your mother and drive with you while drunk? Has your dad physically abused your children? Did your dad remove all of your civil rights and freedom of speech?
  2. I’d rather leave the forum when it is something so serious as people defending a conservatorship.
  3. He sucks. He should be as aggressive as Vivian, but maybe he doesn’t want this to end since that means the money from Britney will stop to come.
  4. Some people here are stupid and they fail to grasp what has happened to Britney. They are also ableist AF and think it is no big deal if a woman loses her voice, children and entire life if you can attach any kind of label on her like “anxiety”. Women don’t need democracy and human rights you know, their daddy or husband can decide for them. And anyone that is not completely average/centre when it comes to anxiety (which would be high since it is so common) is crazy and need to have a relative shut them up and restrain them.
  5. I think it was toxic already when he drove intoxicated with 5 year old Britney in the car, or had violent fights with her mother while she watched crying and jumping of anxiety.
  6. That’s what makes it work and look hot.
  7. She looks awesome in short hair. It would be so great for her to be free and finally decide how she want to look and experiment with different hairstyles and clothes.
  8. Yeah. I don’t think the captions look anything like how she talks in interviews. When she is serious she is very serious and think things through, she is nothing like the 3 exclamation marks and 7 emojis after every sentence like Cassie’s Instagram look like. They don’t even let her speak, why would they hand her the phone or invite her to “send captions” to them? They DGAF what she wants otherwise, I think fans are being naive. If she gets free and says afterwards, as a free person, “YES it WAS me filming myself dancing and posting it 3 minutes later and it was me writing all the captions”, then fine, I’ll respect it. But it is more likely that it is Cassie’s or someone else’s doing since they control how Britney is portrayed in every other aspect. Especially since James repeatedly use the Instagram account as his weapon to say that Britney needs to be conserved.
  9. She can post whatever she wants but she obviously can’t since she is not allowed to speak, sing live, express her opinions etc. If the videos were her ideas I have no problems with them. She looks better than the rest of us when we dance around at home. But I don’t think she meant to post them to Instagram (or that they are new). Since both James and Vivian are using them as their sole example of why Britney would need a conservatorship (it is also the only reason the GP bring up with their stupid comments) I think it is safe to think that they are uploading the “worst” things they can find. Which is honestly nothing crazy at all, she is a creative genius. Have you not seen BJORK and her “weird dancing”, “weird singing”, “weird hairstyles”??!! Or Kate Bush? The Smiths It seems it is only Britney that is not allowed to be human and creative, have real feelings. Journalists and the so called “scum” (go commenting online) are like “No Britney, you are not a person, you are a Barbie Doll, it is crazy if you haven’t fresh makeup on or clothes that are not Versace and the latest fashion. Completely crazy. You can’t vote like that. It is embarrassing how Neanderthal judgemental and xenophobic people are about her Instagram. Even though I still think it is Cassie that edits **** together, speed up videos and chose the content where Britney has the littlest clothes on and the makeup from yesterday.
  10. I registered these things but gave them the benefit of the doubt (they are wrong, but they don’t realise it). Now I think that they wanted to infiltrate the movement to soften its core message (to FREE Britney). “No, she doesn’t need to be free, just get rid of her dad and give her money to Lynne and this whole firm of attorneys as well, who are SILENT while James’s lawyer is exposed on every news channel on the planet.”
  11. THIS is the reason that journalists and other celebrities should have been appalled and said something all along. **** signs on Instagram or exactly what her dad is like, another woman, another citizen, another colleague is more silenced than a person living in domestic abuse. The LAW has approved complete silencing of somone’s voice!
  12. Yes sweetheart, and do you realise that it was tabloids and scum magazines that mainly were cruel to Britney in 2007? I think The Daily Mail was worse than BBC in 2007 as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block