Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback


Posts posted by Nicoregueiro

  1. On 8/22/2020 at 8:28 PM, sugarfallxofme said:

    it still lacks a bridge :deserves:

    One things true.. it does not have aa bridge. Does the song neet it tho? I mean, its still a masterpiece. Its has strong instrumental, strong first verse, pre chorus and strong chrous + plus those high noted vocas from the intro. Its an amazing song! Does not need a bridge in my opinon. 

  2. Well it seems obvious to me that Mood Ring is getting the "Single Hype" effect. Mood Ring is great but if iit wouldnt have been re realeased recently by demand, people wouldnt be so crazy about it. Mood ring has never been so popular since the by demand movement. Same with make me, make me its BAD, but people would consider it for the same reason.. my thought

  3. On 6/23/2020 at 5:12 PM, Circuit said:

    Could you provide a Spek of your All That She Wants and State Of Grace files? ‘Cause they never leaked in lossless. A lot of times scammers change the bit rate (44.1k, 48k, and in your ATSW file’s case, 88.2k) to make it appear in higher quality on Spek than it actually is.

    Off the top of my head, the only unreleased songs that have leaked in lossless are Red Hot Lipstick, And Then We Kiss (Original), Sippin’ On (Original), Rock Star, Dangerous, Every Day, Strangest Love, and Abroad.

    Do you have dangerous in "lossless" i love that one!

    • Like 1
  4. 19 minutes ago, Ofcoursenot said:

    Can you explain what Lossless means?:awks:

    jaja yes sir. Lossless is a kind of compression where the audio file does not loose any quality. On the other hand, mp3 is a kind of compression that loses music quality in the process. Would be a kind of file with no quality loss!

  5. 16 hours ago, kyros said:

    that one and 

    • Rockstar
    • 911
    • And Then We Kiss (Original Version)
    • Look Who's Talking Now
    • Everyday

    got leaked in itunes plus aac 256kbps, wich can get better spectrum peaks than common mp3 320kps, but stills gets lossy, the difference is that mp3 cuts the peaks, so when u do  a spectrum test, the peaks never pass the 18mhz in some cases 20mhz, but with iplus format you can pass that mark but the compression is in the whole stream not just the peak, you can see in your graphic of spek how dirty it looks like like there's some grain in the graphic, well thats the compression, they just work different, but still is lossy here's an example.

    baby one more time lossless (cd sourced) (look how everything gets to the top, and the middle looks rich in color



    then what happen if i convert the lossless version in to itunes plus? (look how the graphic at first sight doesnt change too much but take a deep look in the peaks the get cut in some parts, and the middle parts gets dirty)

    lossless to iplus:



    so now i have this lossy itunes plus version (like the leaked songs) so whats happens if i wanna try get them pass as a lossless version converting the iplus version into wav? well the result is a bigger file, but the lost info and peaks never gets to recover again, so is pointless to upscale the songs

    iplus to wav:



    and finally this is why many people think that just because the peaks are higher is a lossless version, the answer is because we usually gets the leaks in mp3, and the best we ecan get is an mp3 320kbps leak, but the peaks always gets cut, cause thats how the mp3 works, but we always forget that there's better formats (still lossy) than mp3 so when someone do an upscale of iplus they get confused and think they are the real thing


    lossless to mp3 



    hope it gets clear, cause english is not mah native language lol



    Totally got ya! I speak spanish btw. haha. Thank you so much, so clear and so much info!

  6. 1 hour ago, CripplerCrossface said:

    Those files were from a Exhaler (can't remeber who, sorry) who works in remasters of those songs (actually he do re-worked versions of the albums) but obviously use the lossy files, so yeah they are upscaled. Look Who's Talking Now is the only unreleased song that leaked in lossless.

    Thank you so much for the info Miss Crippler hehe.

  7. 37 minutes ago, CJMCH said:

    Actually, they can. It's very common practice.

    It's easy to convert an audio to WAV or M4A lossless format with different softwares. To check if they're the real deal, you have to pass them through audacity and check the audio's spectrum and if the levels don't go all the way up, they're just converted/fake.

    Well but they may change the format, but how cant they change the size en everything else... im downloading spek! so ima check it out and i post the results here!heheh

  8. 11 hours ago, CJMCH said:

    From all of these b-side and unreleased songs, only these could be real, the rest didn't leak in lossless at all:

    • Look Who's Talking Now
    • Over To You Know
    • Intimidated
    • Girls & Boys

    Hi!,  how do you know they havent leaked? I found a few! Look at the bitrate:UNRELEASED-BITRATE.png

    I mean they cant be fake, can them? lol

  9. Hey there!

    Im trying to finish my lossless Britney’s collection by getting some Unreleased songs in lossless quality, or at least some of them in good quality.. i know they are out there. Does anybody have any.. or know where to find them? britney spears GIF

    Here’s a list of what i have in lossless! DM and ill share, of course! 

    • All That She Wants
    • State Of Grace
    • Strangest Love
    • Rockstar
    • Sipping On
    • And Then We Kiss (Original Version)
    • Look Who's Talking Now
    • Everyday
    • Over To You Know
    • Intimidated
    • Girls & Boys


  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block