🚨 The Alleged LIE Told To Britney That Made Conservatorship Permanent (Jan 7, 2009)

[Lola2790]

 

Cover Story: Britney Trades Kids for Fame

OKMAGAZINE.COM

---

She has a #1 album, recently entertained audiences on Good Morning America and shared the...

OK! has learned exclusivly the extraordinary price the singer is paying for her comeback, voluntarily giving up the fight to regain custody of her boys in exchange for fame. Last fall, as her upcoming concert tour was being organized, Brit's camp discovered that because of the star's history, they could not purchase insurance to cover her tour unless she was still under the conservatorship of her father Jamie Spears. Until that point, the plan was for the conservatorship to be lifted on Dec. 31, followed by Britney, 27, heading to family court with a petition to regain custody of Preston and Jayden. But an insider tells OK!, "The insurance situation changed everything." And so, on Oct. 28, the singer agreed to indefinitely accept her father as her conservator – a decision which meant she would still legally be considered a child. No judge would give her custody of her kids, nor would her ex-husband, Kevin Federline, agree to it. "Whether it was her decision or whether she was pressured into it, Britney's deal with the devil put the tour ahead of the kids," the insider tells OK!.

Edited May 4, 2023 by Lola2790

[GlitterRain]

Literally can’t see the words. I- 

 

[SosEtaSeth]

30 minutes ago, GlitterRain said:

Literally can’t see the words. I- 

 

I'll save you the read, it's more bull$hit victim blaming and accusing Britney of being a "bad mom" by "putting her career first" (which we all know is bull)

[canwesynchronize]

[Lola2790]

Fixed.

Main reason:
Brit's camp discovered that because of the star's history, they could not purchase insurance to cover her tour unless she was still under the conservatorship of her father Jamie Spears. Until that point, the plan was for the conservatorship to be lifted on Dec. 31, 2008 followed by Britney, 27, heading to family court with a petition to regain custody of Preston and Jayden.
 

[easy]

5 minutes ago, Lola2790 said:

Fixed.

Main reason:
Brit's camp discovered that because of the star's history, they could not purchase insurance to cover her tour unless she was still under the conservatorship of her father Jamie Spears. Until that point, the plan was for the conservatorship to be lifted on Dec. 31, 2008 followed by Britney, 27, heading to family court with a petition to regain custody of Preston and Jayden.
 

All these old articles do is further prove they never actually intended on ending the con and lied to Britney, which confirms everything she said. We know Britney never would have chose touring over ending the con/getting her custody back. But team con needed that $$$ and lied by telling her after the tour they'd end it. 

[Lola2790]

7 hours ago, easy said:

All these old articles do is further prove they never actually intended on ending the con and lied to Britney, which confirms everything she said. We know Britney never would have chose touring over ending the con/getting her custody back. But team con needed that $$$ and lied by telling her after the tour they'd end it. 

Quote

OK! has learned exclusivly the extraordinary price the singer is paying for her comeback, voluntarily giving up the fight to regain custody of her boys in exchange for fame. Last fall, as her upcoming concert tour was being organized, Brit's camp discovered that because of the star's history, they could not purchase insurance to cover her tour unless she was still under the conservatorship of her father Jamie Spears. Until that point, the plan was for the conservatorship to be lifted on Dec. 31, followed by Britney, 27, heading to family court with a petition to regain custody of Preston and Jayden. But an insider tells OK!, "The insurance situation changed everything." And so, on Oct. 28, the singer agreed to indefinitely accept her father as her conservator – a decision which meant she would still legally be considered a child. No judge would give her custody of her kids, nor would her ex-husband, Kevin Federline, agree to it. "Whether it was her decision or whether she was pressured into it, Britney's deal with the devil put the tour ahead of the kids," the insider tells OK!.

It's disgusting. I'm glad she mentioned on the July 14 hearing when she retained Rosengart that they had kept promising her they would end the conservatorship since Circus...

If this ever goes to trial all these publishers can corroborate her story

[jordeezy river red]

Tea.

[PablitoXS]

It makes sense. I don't think the conservatorship would need to last longer than six months, because when she filmed "For The Record" she was already looking good. I am not saying this is true, but it's very reasonable to believe it. Maybe when her book will explain us what happened. Before people start throwing rocks at me, I have to say that no one knows exactly what has happened in their intimacy. That is specullation.

Edited May 4, 2023 by PablitoXS

[BritneyWiki]

This is twisted to make it sound like it's all Britney's fault and she asked for it.

If she knew it would last 13 years do you really think she would have agreed? She was manipulated and it was forced upon her. She didn't want this.

[RBFLOVESBRITNEY]

Knackers... absolute knackers.

Can't wait for the book.

 

[PablitoXS]

3 hours ago, BritneyWiki said:

This is twisted to make it sound like it's all Britney's fault and she asked for it.

If she knew it would last 13 years do you really think she would have agreed? She was manipulated and it was forced upon her. She didn't want this.

It was a coup against her and the insurance issue must have been the trap that she was caught. The part of the insurance probably was true, but was used as a pretext to take her freedom out. A provisory conservatorship would be easier to get out, then they came out with the permanent one.

It totally makes sense.

[icybaby]

All those insurance, tour companies were profiting of her mysery. Fk her dad and others for it