Goldberry: “Christina and Britney were up for Best New Artist at the 2000 #Grammys , but it didn't go the way people may have expected”

[LeavinExhaleByYearEnd]

Goldberry dissects the reason why Aguilera won over Britney for Best New Artist at Grammys 2000.

 

[NewDisplayName]

They suck!

[MikeHunt]

 

[britney_rocks]

And then Christina went to live on Britney’s shadow for the next two decades, and had 4 eras in a row that were “too ahead of their time”. 

[GlitterRain]

[thankunext]

1 minute ago, britney_rocks said:

And then Christina went to live on Britney’s shadow for the next two decades, and had 4 eras in a row that were “too ahead of their time”. 

I’m going to say it again. Christina is an artist, singer and songwriter. Since 2001 she’s been doing what she wants. As a person and artist she has had more success. In the end nobody cares about 3 or 4 number ones in the US. Meanwhile Britney is a puppet since 1999 and has nothing

[BryanJames]

16 minutes ago, thankunext said:

I’m going to say it again. Christina is an artist, singer and songwriter. Since 2001 she’s been doing what she wants. As a person and artist she has had more success. In the end nobody cares about 3 or 4 number ones in the US. Meanwhile Britney is a puppet since 1999 and has nothing

Though Britney was a "puppet" Xtina didn't stand a chance with her. 

"Since 2001 she’s been doing what she wants." Yeah, releasing bad music and oversinging it while sounding terrible. 

[Oprah Winfrey.]

45 minutes ago, GlitterRain said:

Britney never said this, she told the paparazzi to kiss her *** 

[crazyasamuthafukka]

1 hour ago, thankunext said:

I’m going to say it again. Christina is an artist, singer and songwriter. Since 2001 she’s been doing what she wants. As a person and artist she has had more success. In the end nobody cares about 3 or 4 number ones in the US. Meanwhile Britney is a puppet since 1999 and has nothing

Delusional 

[Sia]

1 hour ago, BryanJames said:

Though Britney was a "puppet" Xtina didn't stand a chance with her. 

"Since 2001 she’s been doing what she wants." Yeah, releasing bad music and oversinging it while sounding terrible. 

And yet, Christina continued to make a living for herself (more than what I’m sure any of us have in our lives), released music on her terms, became a mother and continues to live life on her own terms.

We can flash Britney’s PAST accolades all we want but at the end of the day, does any of it matter? Look at her now…reduced to controversy and struggles, posting nude pics and stirring up drama from bitter memories.

So who exactly is the “loser” here?

Fans who continue to downplay Christina and cling on to Britney’s legacy remind me of those people who peak in high school then fall into oblivion and can’t seem to get out of their high school prom queen world.

[s&m]

21 minutes ago, Sia said:

And yet, Christina continued to make a living for herself (more than what I’m sure any of us have in our lives), released music on her terms, became a mother and continues to live life on her own terms.

We can flash Britney’s PAST accolades all we want but at the end of the day, does any of it matter? Look at her now…reduced to controversy and struggles, posting nude pics and stirring up drama from bitter memories.

So who exactly is the “loser” here?

Fans who continue to downplay Christina and cling on to Britney’s legacy remind me of those people who peak in high school then fall into oblivion and can’t seem to get out of their high school prom queen world.

And Xtwinka doesn’t even have a legacy to begin with!

[Toxic.Latin]

Thank God she did not win that award. Look how a failure is xtinc career now. Not even the latin market want her. LMAO

[fays1]

Best new artist at the grammys isnt about popularity and who will succeed more, its about awknowledging new artists with great talent. 

Christina is this generation voice, and one of the best voices ever, and considering the Grammys care about vocals, it make sense that Christina won over Britney.
 
But also, why are you thinking about Christina? And reading the comments, you guys sound like mentally ill children!

[bbbsss]

4 minutes ago, Toxic.Latin said:

Thank God she did not win that award. Look how a failure is xtinc career now. Not even the latin market want her. LMAO

is that why she just won a Latin Grammy and keeps getting booked for the Latin festivals?

[Toxic.Latin]

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/christina-aguileras-la-fuerza-fails-to-chart-on-billboard.4795959/ 

 

 

 

[mr. ferret]

24 minutes ago, bbbsss said:

is that why she just won a Latin Grammy and keeps getting booked for the Latin festivals?

Oh please, nobody gives a flying **** about Christina Aguilera in South America.

Here in Brazil her last hit was Ain't no other Man and she is known by my generation as a ***** because when she came to Brazil she made a very bad impression on the MTV presenters who were very popular with the public. Later, already during the decadence after Bionic, she gave an interview to one of the biggest TV news programs where she became a meme due to her recurrent dislike.

Search for "came in without saying hello and left without saying goodbye".

The generation after mine doesn't even know who she is.

Now she comes with this super fake Latin era even though her only Latin tie is from her father who she hated. She is not Latina and never will be, it is the same thing as me saying I am Italian because my great grandfather was.

American artists like her, Selena and JLO get on my nerves when they come with this Latino thing, releasing generic and cheap works to supposedly pay homage to their roots, bull****.

[LeavinExhaleByYearEnd]

58 minutes ago, mr. ferret said:

bad impression on the MTV presenters

That look on Sabrina legs is one of MTV Brasil iconic moments

[Emil87]

2 hours ago, fays1 said:

Best new artist at the grammys isnt about popularity and who will succeed more, its about awknowledging new artists with great talent. 

Christina is this generation voice, and one of the best voices ever, and considering the Grammys care about vocals, it make sense that Christina won over Britney.
 
But also, why are you thinking about Christina? And reading the comments, you guys sound like mentally ill children!

Christina has a great voice no doubt but you can’t be this generations voice when your solo career peaked in 2006 (and I’m being generous), Im sorry. And if the Grammys cared so much about vocals, why does Beyonce have more than Whitney, Mariah, Celine, and Christina combined? They were/are all better vocalists. 

 

[fays1]

6 hours ago, Emil87 said:

Christina has a great voice no doubt but you can’t be this generations voice when your solo career peaked in 2006 (and I’m being generous), Im sorry. And if the Grammys cared so much about vocals, why does Beyonce have more than Whitney, Mariah, Celine, and Christina combined? They were/are all better vocalists. 

 

Her voice is too good that she was named the voice of the generation dispite her career not being huge.

And the Grammys do care about vocals, but it also does has its own politics, and it changed alot since back then.

[Emil87]

3 minutes ago, fays1 said:

Her voice is too good that she was named the voice of the generation dispite her career not being huge.

And the Grammys do care about vocals, but it also does has its own politics, and it changed alot since back then.

Ok but by whom? Who besides her fanbase refers to her as the voice of the generation?

And how exactly has it changed since back then? For gods sakes, flukes like Milli Vanilli and Baha Men won Grammys but actual legendary acts like Diana Ross, Queen, Tupac, and Jimi Hendrix have none. The Grammys were always bulls**t.