I rewatched Framing Britney Spears the other day and I think I get why Britney hates it.

[adrixnsc]

I thought the documentary helped her a lot and brought general public´s attention to the #FreeBritney movement at the time, but seeing it now I realised that eveyone involved talked about Lynne like a good-caring mother that only wants happiness for her daughter. Even Felicia talked about her like some kind of protector of Britney.

Now we all know how Britney feels about her mother and all her family, no only her father, so it´s only normal that she feels those documentaries are not accurate or true. There´s much more to her story that only her can tell.

[DollyParton]

You cute

 

 

[alleyesonme393]

Agreed and they ALWAYS have to bring up the head shaving and 2007 antics. As if the public doesn’t remember. Nobody needs a reminder of the worst time in her life. I just know she despises when they bring that time period up and I do not blame her at all.

[TenTen]

11 minutes ago, alleyesonme393 said:

Agreed and they ALWAYS have to bring up the head shaving and 2007 antics. As if the public doesn’t remember. Nobody needs a reminder of the worst time in her life. I just know she despises when they bring that time period up and I do not blame her at all.

True. But I do think that the worst time of her life were certain periods of the conservatorship, not 2007. Everything was going downhill, but at least she had her freedom to an extent. 

[Crazy4BRITNEY3.0]

10 minutes ago, alleyesonme393 said:

they ALWAYS have to bring up the head shaving and 2007 antics. As if the public doesn’t remember. Nobody needs a reminder of the worst time in her life.

To be fair the NYT and Netflix docs have been VERY respectful in keeping it vague when talking about 2007 and haven't actually showed any footage of her most talked about moments from the time...

[zone]

Obviously the way we see it its totally different from the way SHE sees it

[BPI]

I think if they hadn't "saved" Britney in 2007 ... we wouldn't be here today, unfortunately they marched on us.

[3IsACharm33]

I think it simply strikes a nerve with Britney because they made Britney feel dead, and Britney has been made to feel dead for 13 years. 

[s&m]

3 hours ago, adrixnsc said:

I thought the documentary helped her a lot and brought general public´s attention to the #FreeBritney movement at the time, but seeing it now I realised that eveyone involved talked about Lynne like a good-caring mother that only wants happiness for her daughter. Even Felicia talked about her like some kind of protector of Britney.

Now we all know how Britney feels about her mother and all her family, no only her father, so it´s only normal that she feels those documentaries are not accurate or true. There´s much more to her story that only her can tell.

Can I take you on a date? 

[HIM]

Just for that? I don’t know about that. I think it’s as simple as not wanting your damn business being talked about by other people. Like excuse me who are you lol

 

Britney has every right to feel how she feels about them. I personally think they helped her. 

[Hamelia]

They may have helped Rosengart to find out how much she was bullied. As a member of the GP, he probably didn't follow her or listen to pop music. He said he read the article in the NYT.  If the article and "Framing Britney' made up his mind to take her case, then they helped her.

Showing her weak moments ... nobody would like it.  I don't actually remember what was said about her mother. Once Britney discovered how much she was involved in the establishment of the conservatorship, that's when their relationship really broke down.

 

[FemmeFataleBrit]

[FemmeFataleBrit]

I don’t care for Britney not appreciating the documentary but I support her especially because I find that NYT journalist really annoying for some reason 

[Psammead]

It had to be done. Although I can see why it's painful for Britney. No one knew how she really felt about the conservatorship even that recently, and with her family saying she was fine with it, they had to be so careful just to report what they heard. The first article NYT did in 2016, asking if she "still" needed one had to finish kind of neutrally.

The documentary was essential, though, in "reframing" Britney Spears, turning the focus to how her image was manipulated in the media, creating the conditions for her imprisonment. I think the filmmakers have been as sensitive as they could be in those circumstances, while still bringing attention to it. It's so hard to shift public perception, and they helped to do that.

[DiamondCircus]

5 hours ago, alleyesonme393 said:

Agreed and they ALWAYS have to bring up the head shaving and 2007 antics. As if the public doesn’t remember. Nobody needs a reminder of the worst time in her life. I just know she despises when they bring that time period up and I do not blame her at all.

I'm curious if that isn't touched on how you would do a documentary to talk about Britney being in a C ship and what led up to it?

I think she doesn't want that part of her life drummed up all the time, but it's important to see the entire path that led to her entrapment. 

[Flavor Of Love]

6 hours ago, DollyParton said:

You cute

 

 

[Jup1ter]

1 hour ago, FemmeFataleBrit said:

I don’t care for Britney not appreciating the documentary but I support her especially because I find that NYT journalist really annoying for some reason 

 

I think back then I was not really fond of more documentaries like the one that came out late last year, I was not really excited to see more of it I guess, and I support her too, how annoying it must be somebody getting your life story in their perception? this is not what it is, but I like the NY one bc it was emotionally well constructed + the Monica part surprising bc I remembered her as a kid, I knew the story as kid so it was interesting to get a little perspective on that, other cool thing was that some people actually needed to see how journalists are annoying bullies and overall it was a good doc, but I don't even remember it now

 

7 hours ago, alleyesonme393 said:

Agreed and they ALWAYS have to bring up the head shaving and 2007 antics. As if the public doesn’t remember. Nobody needs a reminder of the worst time in her life. I just know she despises when they bring that time period up and I do not blame her at all.

that was such a rockstar move,

she probably could care less about it now

it's just: 

[sykology]

I think Britney is acutely aware that those who participated in the documentary would much rather have their 15 minutes of fame than actually reach out to her and help her directly. I completely understand why Britney hates the documentaries and I believe she would have been free without them. 

[limecakes]

7 hours ago, alleyesonme393 said:

Agreed and they ALWAYS have to bring up the head shaving and 2007 antics. As if the public doesn’t remember. Nobody needs a reminder of the worst time in her life. I just know she despises when they bring that time period up and I do not blame her at all.

Also the head shaving is always linked with the narrative that she needed a conservatorship. She needed no such thing. Her family used her cship as a way to control her life and more importantly her money, which they have always felt entitled to

[Z-dawg]

9 hours ago, adrixnsc said:

I thought the documentary helped her a lot and brought general public´s attention to the #FreeBritney movement at the time, but seeing it now I realised that eveyone involved talked about Lynne like a good-caring mother that only wants happiness for her daughter. Even Felicia talked about her like some kind of protector of Britney.

Now we all know how Britney feels about her mother and all her family, no only her father, so it´s only normal that she feels those documentaries are not accurate or true. There´s much more to her story that only her can tell.

This is creepy because I did the same thing yesterday (only watched it when it came out) and I thought exactly the same…