Why Britney didn't stay for the whole 2007 Vma's show? / Why she didn't walk the red carpet

[Duff Man]

Even in 2022 when gimme more comes on i remember the 2007 vma routine   its britney *****.

 

[Duff Man]

2007 for was the perfect metaphor for everyones life...you go you go you grow up fast..you live you love you get broken hearted..you create a home then watch it consume you..you get your coincidence back because PEOPLE TOLD YOU TOO!! but when you do   your just masking up sadness   you lost something so you need distracting..i know personally..can't believe I'm saying this  

 

[3IsACharm33]

2 hours ago, Duff Man said:

Britney was the most famous most photographed woman at the time..and she was for a LONG time.. this performance was was what actually made the vmas 2007..they needed something to talk about and britney made headlines worldwide simply for doing her thing..the world wanted more..yet less..yet more. Yet less..britney put a mirror up to Hollywood culture and America wasn't ready for it... some ugly woman apparently a comedian (yet shes never once made me laugh, seriously the brits see 'silver ****eman' and i wonder how shes considered a 'comedian' said some nasty joke about britney's kids being 'adorable mistakes' and britney wasnt gonna stay present for a show she basically invented..

she cried out of the building ..AND SHE WAS THE ******* HEADLINER 

2007 CULTURE for you kids..

Britney dances... suddenly 14 years of her life is swept up and everyone's asking why?..

Britney cried so you guys could say 'money doesnt matter'..

Britney is te epitome of working hard throughout everything.  

Her last few concerts were more lik free hand outs.. jamie made his money and britney was done with him 

The vmas took advantage of Britney’s mental state at the time, it was clear to everyone Britney wasn’t in a good state to perform so she was definitely coerced into it, I don’t think anyone wanted that performance to be good if the vmas executive cared about the quality of their show they wouldn’t have let Britney perform knowing it was a risk considering her recent breakdown

[Duff Man]

So my son is 10..

The mom is happy and 8 month pregnant and im so happy for them all

Happy she found someone..

But my son is excited getting a new brother 

He doesnt want to see me at all recently 

I ask and i ask.. always a no

Bit like britney's situation ..now..

I have a choice either punish myself and cry (which i do alot)

Or just accept I've done my best and carry on until it all sorts itself out.. yeah.. i cried everyday i dont see my son..im not used to it.. but im a good dad and maybe i deserve some free time so **** it . I relate to britney somehow.. im free and thats why im lonely! You have a familylife that doesn'texist in my place

...happy oktoberfest 🍻

[Duff Man]

14 minutes ago, 3IsACharm33 said:

The vmas took advantage of Britney’s mental state at the time, it was clear to everyone Britney wasn’t in a good state to perform so she was definitely coerced into it, I don’t think anyone wanted that performance to be good if the vmas executive cared about the quality of their show they wouldn’t have let Britney perform knowing it was a risk considering her recent breakdown

No i completely understand..but the reason vmas had britney was because britney was 'controversy' ...all the award shows was less about music and more about controversy 'who can bring in the most viewers?' Britney simply gave them a garunteed future headline..i dont really know of any other performances that night yet britney's goes down in history 

She shouldn't of had to perform i know..but i think with new material she wanted to..whats worse is the 13 years that followed ..no ego..no control..just flat performimg on the promise that one day 'things will go back to normal' 

I've said it so many times but not enough..jamie needs jail..lieing to the conservatee giving false hope whilst taking their money..jamie needs to rot ..its a crime literally that hes not already in prison 

[Duff Man]

51 minutes ago, 3IsACharm33 said:

The vmas took advantage of Britney’s mental state at the time, it was clear to everyone Britney wasn’t in a good state to perform so she was definitely coerced into it, I don’t think anyone wanted that performance to be good if the vmas executive cared about the quality of their show they wouldn’t have let Britney perform knowing it was a risk considering her recent breakdown

 

At the end of the day everyone..absolutely everyone goes through hard times.. 

But if a random estranged family member came in(i dont even know my mum) and suddenly came in and 'took over' and they could BECAUSE OF THE COURTS..

I'd be ******* angry too..

It's so set up..this is a more obvious 100% proof case thana r*** case yet its being ignored and pushed back? ..there is no evidence you can muster mr jamie spears that will ever clear your name ..YOU CHOSE TO BE HER CONSERVATOR THEN WHEN FREEBRITNEY HAPPENED YOU COWARDLY SAID 'its up to the state of california to decide' OHH OK SO NOW YOUR NOT LOOKING FOR HER BEST INTERESTS? ITS CALIFORNIA LAW PROBLEM?? 

HOW HAS COURT ROOM ALLOWED THIS NONSENSE?!! ITS BLOOD BOILING..

jamies the whole minimum 5% percentage of britney's earnings is messed up..what court allowed and accepted this?.. i bet britney was kept in the dark about buissness deals 'for her own protection' - 'i am britney spears'- jamie spears  

Britney is clearly owed 100 million minimum by lou kant face sour lemon fake arse pathetic excuse for a 'religious type' .. i ******* hope lou and jamie rot..ok.. so i dont technically believe in 1 god.. so technically i dont believe in heaven or hell..however..i wish jamie and lou (jailor not  tayor) die soonish as karma deserves ..

I feel people  are forgetting about lou and jamie and letting them off and i feel the opposite..they are real criminals..they are actually sick sinners.. they are everything thats wrong with people..but they are not yet being charged for their actions?? 

This comment took ages hope someone agrees 

[Flavor Of Love]

6 hours ago, Frankie8 said:

Word was she was embarassed of her performance and left.

She gave to this performance more **ck than whole POM 

I love this one. People are rude in judging even they know what was behind.

[Flavor Of Love]

5 hours ago, Joshyworld said:

2005-09 was the worst era of fashion that I’ve witnessed in my lifetime 

F U!

2005-2007, was cool.

 

 

This one is for Juno Lou:

[Rik vs Exhale]

15 hours ago, Duff Man said:

2007 for was the perfect metaphor for everyones life...you go you go you grow up fast..you live you love you get broken hearted..you create a home then watch it consume you..you get your coincidence back because PEOPLE TOLD YOU TOO!! but when you do   your just masking up sadness   you lost something so you need distracting..i know personally..can't believe I'm saying this  

 

 

[Dussiniers]

21 hours ago, Alex Murr said:

I always wondered that?
Britney used to stay at the whole Vma's, there were clips of her reacting in the audience, but after the conservatorship, she didn't stay long anymore, probably forced by her team.

It's also curious that at the Vma's 08, she only took pictures with Jonas Brothers, Taylor Swift and Paris Hilton but 'cause they approached her in the audience, but what about the other A-list celebrities that day?

It was Britney's official comeback night,
no other celebrity approached her to congratulate her, at least not in public? 

Why didn't Brit and Xtina  even say hello to each other? 

Yes, I came for this comment Xtincta 

[AmandaLick]

On 10/15/2022 at 6:14 PM, unusualyouforever said:

based on various reports she was hungover from partying the night before and it was like pulling teeth to even get her out of her room and get her dressed for the performance.  she was definitely not in any state to walk the red carpet.

If this is the "truth," why would management continue with the performance? Clearly if someone doesn't feel comfortable, it should've been reconsidered. I think this is a raw performance, but if she wasn't feeling it what made her go through with it? Hmmmmmm....