Jump to content

Breaking: Britney objects to Jamie Spears paying his attorneys fees from Britney's estate, Exhibit 2: Tri Star and Robin Greenhill’s failure to comply with subpoenas

Recommended Posts

With the explosive confirmation of illegal activity and todays court filings by Britney and Rosengart, the utter failure at painting Britney as a knife wielding psycho by Lou and her lover Jamie Lou and Jamie Daddy Spears is over lmao! 

Time for jail for these wretches pieces of **** 

Link to comment
1 minute ago, warioaddams said:

Can you post the article please

By Liz Day

Jan. 18, 2022, 9:35 p.m. ET

A lawyer for Britney Spears, in an effort to thwart her father’s demand that she pay his legal bills, claimed in court papers filed on Tuesday that her father and others involved with her conservatorship had committed myriad financial improprieties over several years.

Among the many accusations in the filing was a claim that Ms. Spears’s father, James P. Spears, paid almost $6 million from her estate to a security firm that somehow obtained private phone records for Ms. Spears’s mother and others and obtained GPS “ping data” to track the locations of people close to Ms. Spears.

Mr. Spears, known as Jamie, was in charge of the conservatorship for most of its nearly 14-year existence, until a judge terminated the legal arrangement in November in the wake of public pleas by Britney Spears and news media reports about possible wrongdoing. Mr. Spears, who had been suspended as conservator of his daughter’s estate in September, subsequently requested that his legal fees be paid for by Ms. Spears. His lawyer, Alex M. Weingarten, charges $1,200 an hour, according to a court filing.

The requests for Mr. Spears’s and other legal fees charged during the conservatorship are expected to be discussed at a Los Angeles court hearing on Wednesday.


In his petition, Mr. Spears’s lawyer argued that the singer’s estate should pay for his legal expenses in order to ensure the conservatorship is closed out properly and because Mr. Spears had engaged in no wrongdoing.


In response, Ms. Spears’s lawyer said in the filing that the court should reject Mr. Spears’s demands because “the allegations of misconduct against him are specific, credible and serious, ranging from abuse to conflicts of interest, financial mismanagement and corruption of the conservatorship to implicating state and federal criminal law.”

The lawyer, Mathew S. Rosengart, cited several revelations about the handling of the conservatorship that were first reported by The New York Times as well as new findings detailed by Sherine Ebadi, an investigator at Kroll and a former F.B.I. agent retained by Ms. Spears’s legal team to investigate Mr. Spears’s management of the estate.

Lawyers for Mr. Spears and Ms. Spears did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

A declaration by Ms. Ebadi detailed her corroboration of allegations first reported by The Times about how Mr. Spears and the firm Black Box Security monitored Ms. Spears’s phone, including her communications with her lawyer, and secretly recorded her in her bedroom.

The declaration by Ms. Ebadi in the court filing said that she had interviewed the former Black Box employee Alex Vlasov, and that he described how Black Box allegedly obtained private phone records for Ms. Spears’s mother and others to determine if they were speaking to the news media. He also told Ms. Ebadi, according to the filing, that Black Box would obtain GPS “ping data” to obtain the locations of certain people, such as former boyfriends, for surveillance.


It was unclear how the security firm might have obtained this information. The declaration notes that these methods are typically available only to law enforcement authorities via a court order.

The declaration also alleges that Mr. Spears asked Black Box to send him his daughter’s “therapy notes” from her iCloud account, despite being aware that he was expressly prohibited from reviewing them without Ms. Spears’s permission.

Ms. Ebadi noted that Black Box had been paid almost $6 million from Ms. Spears’s estate.

Ms. Spears’s legal team claimed that “the conservatorship originated from an ethically conflicted relationship,” citing a $40,000 loan first reported by The Times that was made by Tri Star, a business management firm run by Mr. Spears’s friend Louise M. Taylor, to Mr. Spears around the time that he applied for the conservatorship. While still indebted to the company, Mr. Spears then hired Tri Star to manage his daughter’s estate, a role that netted the firm millions during the conservatorship.

According to the court filing, Kroll’s investigation has identified several instances in which Mr. Spears engaged in financial misconduct, self-dealing and mismanagement as conservator.

The filing claimed Mr. Spears engaged in self-dealing as conservator when he sold Ms. Spears’s childhood home to himself. It also said Mr. Spears had paid for his living expenses with his daughter’s funds, including close to $9,000 paid to Advanced Multimedia Partners, a business entity owned by James P. Watson III, the husband of Mr. Spears’s daughter Jamie Lynn Spears.

Ms. Ebadi also notes that Mr. Spears paid costs of $1.5 million related to upkeep of Ms. Spears’s property in Louisiana — two to three times the value of the house — and evaded a question raised by the court as to the “extraordinarily high expenses.” She stated that more than $178,000 of the $1.5 million spent on the Louisiana residence was paid to Advanced Multimedia Partners.

The filing alleges that the estate, at times, paid for improper legal fees for others, including expenses related to Ms. Taylor, and an episode involving a domestic violence restraining order filed against Mr. Spears that barred him from contact with Ms. Spears’s children.

The court papers state that over the course of the conservatorship, Mr. Spears approved the payment of more than $30 million in fees to dozens of law firms, “including large payments for evidently small matters, as well as significant overlap in work performed.”

The court filings included additional requests for discovery and depositions that Ms. Spears’s legal team believes will produce more evidence of misconduct.

Lawyers for Tri Star and Black Box Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Previously, a lawyer for Black Box said the firm’s officials “have always conducted themselves within professional, ethical and legal bounds,” and a lawyer for Tri Star said the company “faithfully served the estate.”

  • Love 7
  • Like 1
Link to comment

Leave a comment!

Not so fast! Did you know you can post now and register later? If you are already a member of Exhale, sign in here and start posting!
If you are not logged in, your post will need to be manually approved by an Exhale moderator before it's visible to everyone.

Tap to reply!

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block