Taylor Swift will face a jury for "Shake It Off" lawsuit

[Markoct]

Lets see if she can shake it off 

[Oprah Winfrey.]

Not to

41 minutes ago, maki93 said:

Taylor Swift is one of the best song writers of this generation. Last time I checked, "haters gonna hate" and "players gonna play" are well know publicly used statements that should not be referenced lol. It is a joke, similar to when Britney was sued over : "If I said I want your body, would you hold it against me?". 3LW can go get publicity elsewhere, noting that I have no idea who they are or what they do in life 

The songwriters are suing not 3lw. so many people just commenting not knowing what’s even going on.
 

 

[Adriannn]

That’s what happens when you don’t make ‘New Romantics’ the lead single. 
Anyway, she’ll win, they just want to see if they can get money. 

[MikeHunt]

Hilary is coming for Taylor next

 

[MasterMindz]

7 minutes ago, 3IsACharm33 said:

Not to

The songwriters are suing not 3lw. so many people just commenting not knowing what’s even going on.
 

 

My comment still stands.

[FullyDattAndDatt3full]

oh who would win the "i love you" phrase lawsuit???

i got an answer for it too

Jesus, a lot would say

so Jesus would earn a fortune in court

and real Jesus would use it solely for his creation, the money from winning "i love you" phrase lawsuit

tons of wine, drinking with his ***an, the devils of Jesus and a lots of hidden laughter from Jesus's followers.

[Oprah Winfrey.]

14 minutes ago, maki93 said:

My comment still stands.

No it doesn’t because 3LW isn’t looking for any publicity, because the 3 members are very successful and working in Hollywood still. But you wouldn’t know that

[Anti-Hero]

Quick, anyone who has ever written a song with the phrase "all too well" in it, sue Taylor! Plagiarism!!!

[Stefani]

3 hours ago, anthony7226 said:

And there's the first "karma" comment. She should lose a frivolous lawsuit for "what she did to Katy"? That's not how law works. C'mon. 

Ignoring the Katy thing, Taylor and her team of lawyers have a habit of threatening litigation against people for a variety of equally frivolous reasons, so it is indeed karmatic that she's getting a taste of her own medicine, especially a week after the Grammys made it clear that they won't be counting her  questionable songwriting credits on Sour. See, when you do clownery...

[kfitz421]

If anyone should be suing T Swift it’s Hilary Duff. Paper Rings sounds too much like Breathe in Breathe Out, and I will not rest until Hilary gets her day in court 

[Isla]

2 hours ago, jayyzdayyz said:

Taylor didn’t steal from them. 3LW didn’t sue Taylor. The songwriters did. I guess they spoke about it today. https://twitter.com/official_3lw/status/1469335561219497992?s=21

Is that even their official Twitter account? 3LW split years ago?

[MasterMindz]

1 hour ago, 3IsACharm33 said:

No it doesn’t because 3LW isn’t looking for any publicity, because the 3 members are very successful and working in Hollywood still. But you wouldn’t know that

Yes Ofcourse! with netwoth less than 2 million dollars each, I am sure they are very busy in Hollywood! 

[anthony7226]

1 hour ago, Stefani said:

Ignoring the Katy thing, Taylor and her team of lawyers have a habit of threatening litigation against people for a variety of equally frivolous reasons, so it is indeed karmatic that she's getting a taste of her own medicine, especially a week after the Grammys made it clear that they won't be counting her  questionable songwriting credits on Sour. See, when you do clownery...

Taylor didn't submit for writing credits on Sour. Olivia put Taylor as a credit and the Grammy's followed suit. We don't know what happened behind closed doors but I'm sure Taylor is not upset in the slightest she was removed from the Grammy nom. She has her own nom. As for Taylor's lawsuits, there are lots of people and companies always trying to capitalize on her likeness, her songs, her merch. Those are warranted. Just because you feel a certain way about her or her Reputation doesn't mean she should have to be taken to court over Playas and Haters. It's downright absurd. But I get how over-exposed she was at one point, but we can't hold that against her.

[MasterMindz]

2 hours ago, Stefani said:

Ignoring the Katy thing, Taylor and her team of lawyers have a habit of threatening litigation against people for a variety of equally frivolous reasons, so it is indeed karmatic that she's getting a taste of her own medicine, especially a week after the Grammys made it clear that they won't be counting her  questionable songwriting credits on Sour. See, when you do clownery...

I mean Taylor is nominated with Evermore for album of the year with or without the sour nomination, she doesn't need it. This was a mess from the Grammy's side, not Taylor. 

[jayyzdayyz]

2 hours ago, Isla said:

Is that even their official Twitter account? 3LW split years ago?

It’s official. Their production people follow it. It’s tied to the members. 

[Isla]

15 minutes ago, jayyzdayyz said:

It’s official. Their production people follow it. It’s tied to the members. 

Ohhh I see!

[RadicalOptimism]

10 hours ago, anthony7226 said:

Waiting for all the "It's karma" Karens and "It's what she deserves" Deborahs. Playas gonna play, hata's gonna hate are not unique lyrics. They are repeated ad nauseam in tv shows, movies, every day conversations, and yes, lyrics. The writer's behind 3LW's basic song did not invent those phrases. This case should rightfully be in her favor. 

 

Seriously, of all the songs she would rip off ... 3LW? 

[Isla]

I saw a Facebook comment earlier about how the ‘What about your promises promises?’ line in Babe reminded them of the ‘I’m getting a little tired of your broken promises promises’ line in 3LW’s No More nnn

[Moscow]

Listen to the real Shake it off by queen Mariah! 

[Oprah Winfrey.]

18 hours ago, maki93 said:

Yes Ofcourse! with netwoth less than 2 million dollars each, I am sure they are very busy in Hollywood! 

Lol wrong again, you’re not very good at this.

also you make 2 million sound like nothing