Jump to content

Monster energy won’t comment on whether it still has ties to Jamie


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Brit52 said:

To be fair, Jamie hasn't been convicted or even charged with anything. You're asking a brand to potentially break a contract over hearsay 

Not saying he ISNT guilty, but in a legal sense, he hasn't done anything wrong (that has been proven without a shadow of a doubt)

Cancel culture has gotten so out of hand that once one person says something about someone they dislike, whether it's deserved or not, people lose their entire livelihoods and lives are ruined

Again, I'm not saying Jamie is innocent, I'm more speaking about culture cancel in general.

 

Also if they declined to comment then maybe they did cut ties and have decided to just stay out of the entire mess completely 

Yeah Jamie is innocent, he just drugged her daughter, made her work against her will, has an active restraining order for domestic violence and made her go to a psychiatric facility, no big deal :)

Link to comment

I don't know what this drink is, and I really don't know why they thought Jamie was an attractive prospect for their branding, or what exactly he does for them (wear their sweatshirt?) but I can't imagine he's such a huge thing that they feel they have to explain if he's there or not there.

In general, though, I wish the entertainment world would show more solidarity with Britney. I guess celebrities can't easily dump Lou or Larry, without creating a legal mess for themselves. But more could be said. This conservatorship game is an attack on artists, and came close to being an accepted "hybrid business model".

Why is that musical still going on? The least they could do is acknowledge the situation.

Skechers is an exception to the rule, so far.

Link to comment
  • Exhale+
14 hours ago, Brit52 said:

To be fair, Jamie hasn't been convicted or even charged with anything. You're asking a brand to potentially break a contract over hearsay 

Not saying he ISNT guilty, but in a legal sense, he hasn't done anything wrong (that has been proven without a shadow of a doubt)

Cancel culture has gotten so out of hand that once one person says something about someone they dislike, whether it's deserved or not, people lose their entire livelihoods and lives are ruined

Again, I'm not saying Jamie is innocent, I'm more speaking about culture cancel in general.

 

Also if they declined to comment then maybe they did cut ties and have decided to just stay out of the entire mess completely 

To be fair, Jamie kind of deserves to lose his livelihood and have his life ruined. He's unapologetically done that to his daughter.

  • Like 1

🔥 Hot take: Be nice to other fans, even if you disagree ✌️ #FreeBritney is stronger together than divided 💪 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Corruptured Colon said:

To be fair, Jamie kind of deserves to lose his livelihood and have his life ruined. He's unapologetically done that to his daughter.

Oh I'm not questioning that at all... my train of thought was more along the lines of a PR perspective for Monster

What Wendy said to Jamie. Lol like I said,I'm not at all defending him... I guess I'm defending Monster (tbh at this point I don't even know what I'm talking about anymore)

Link to comment
  • Exhale+
20 minutes ago, Brit52 said:

Oh I'm not questioning that at all... my train of thought was more along the lines of a PR perspective for Monster

What Wendy said to Jamie. Lol like I said,I'm not at all defending him... I guess I'm defending Monster (tbh at this point I don't even know what I'm talking about anymore)

Haha no worries! I do agree with your post that cancel culture is getting kind of out of hand, though. I personally think it's better to give someone the opportunity to apologize and learn from a mistake than cancel them altogether, which is why I mentioned that Jamie "unapologetically" took away Britney's livelihood.

Although, if we're being honest, even if Jamie did express genuine sorrow, I'm not sure I'd be able to forgive him. He's probably an exception for me.

  • Like 1

🔥 Hot take: Be nice to other fans, even if you disagree ✌️ #FreeBritney is stronger together than divided 💪 

Link to comment
On 10/13/2021 at 5:27 PM, Kletus said:

Well Jamie Lynn isn’t associated with anything, the only company that could disown her would be baby bottle pop :awks_britney_side_eye_awkward_2011_ff_femme_Fatale:

Well she apparently is still working for Core Foods as a brand ambassador. She just did a post pushing their probiotic bars on her Instagram right now. 

I just don’t understand it. Other people get dropped as brand ambassadors at the drop of a hat. But these companies want to continue working with Jamie & Jamie Lynn Spears?

It especially seems unfair because you know the only reason they wanted to work with them in the first place is because of their relationship to Britney.

It’s just sickening that they STILL get to keep exploiting that for $$$. 

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block