Today's explosive court hearing to discuss replacing/removing Jamie, ending the conservatorship altogether and accounting issues
-
Create a topic! -
-
New Activity
5568465By 3IsACharm33
Started162By Cqleb
Started25By JayTawndre
Started18100 -
-
-
Similar Content
-
-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
New comments
-
By generation glory · Posted
New report from that trashy gossip site saying Britney’s lawyer hasn’t responded to KFed’s request to move to Hawaii and MVK is giving her til Friday to respond. They claim she has no real objection but no word yet. Most here want her to object for reasons already discussed. Maybe it’s hard for her to let them move despite them not wanting to see her but she doesn’t have to roll over for KFed and Kaplan. Britney has parental rights. I hope she objects. It’s not even a top story at the site which it normally would be. That’s interesting… And to the OP’s topic. Rosengart should demand KFed give account to how he spends the child support money AND request a modification in the amount she has to pay AND definitely bring up the Hawaii child support age requirement for children over 18 as being an ulterior motive for the Feds wanting to move there!! It should not always be that Britney has to keep forking over her money and getting subpoenaed for her finances. Britney no longer can be bullied by these two greedy slime balls. **** KFed, Kaplan and their “threats” to take Britney to court. Lame scare tactics. She has nothing to fear. I really hope she fights this!! -
By Flavor Of Love · Posted
Still, she "figured it out" in such a weird way that I don't really buy it "Changing" gender according to how one sleeps is really enough. -
Well if you check her Insta bio it says her pronouns are she/her and they/them -
1. What a dumb question to ask in a Britney-focused forum. Of course most people are going to say Britney deserved it more. So obviously this post is not about getting legitimate responses, but rather more about stirring the pot and creating yet another avenue to talk trash about Christina. 2. To answer this truthfully and honestly, you have to strip everything you know about Britney and go only off of what Britney had accomplished and what she represented up until February 23rd, 2000 and compare it to Christina. Both Britney and Christina had a phenomenal year in terms of sales and success. We know Britney's album sold over 10 million in the US alone but Christina's still sold close to 9 million so you're still talking massive success with both. Christina's album garnered more positive reviews from critics overall and while it did have its share of teen bops, it still had a more mature sound and style - so she was taken a little more seriously. Talent wise, Britney was seen as more of a performer where Christina was more of a vocalist. That in itself gave her an edge over Britney. Christina had also done a song for a major motion picture soundtrack (Mulan) so again, it gave her an edge over Britney. Britney was already being plagued with the lip-singing stuff and her live vocals were not celebrated so again, she didn't have the edge that Christina did. Seeing all of this, it's no surprise Christina won. Whether or not her career panned out as well as Britney's is a whole other topic, but if you're talking about the Grammy's as a standalone award, then yah, Christina deserved it over Britney. -
By Flavor Of Love · Posted
Maybe that "non-binary" wasn't trendy anymore for her, so she went back to "her" when she saw that it wouldn't save her career
-
Recommended Posts