Rumor: Britney may release an album with songs from the Glory sessions to finish her contract with RCA

[♔ monalisaney ♚]

I just hope they make it Glory 2 and not try to pass it as a brand new Britney album

[Moscow]

1 hour ago, Haha-Hehe-Haha-Ho said:

From what I know, anyone with actual insider sources knows better than to share real tea publicly on exhale. That's how you get shunned. Not saying @Prachi is lying, just saying their source may not be as legit as they claim to be.

I agree, I just told what I heard today thats why I said it's a rumour and nothing is confirmed. 

[car]

27 minutes ago, ♔ monalisaney ♚ said:

We love a throwback reference

Ahaha thanks for recognizing bb 

[electraheart]

I believe it, if only for the fact that so many songs were registered at once, which doesn't seem normal. I'm all for her doing whatever she wants, of course. But I do think she has so much good will, her next new music (should she choose to release new music) would do so well, and I worry an album of Glory leftovers will kill that momentum. But also, **** RCA. I'd be so happy for her if she gets out of that.

[Julien62300]

Can’t anyone think, just a minute, that these songs are maybe not just simply « rejects » , but songs that britney really love, and never made the cut cause of the creative direction of her label/team with Glory ? 
You guys are never happy, no matter what happen it’s never enough… 

I really hope that she never read that negativity. The more important is that, soon, she will be free to create her own musical stuff, as she want, and more important, IF she wants to. 
sorry for my english, love from France 🇫🇷 !

[Alestaos]

Eh, i hope its not true. I don't want another stereotypical album from Britney. I want an album she has passion for and cares about its reception. I really like Glory, but not this.

[britbitch94]

The contract was signed while the conservatorship was in place, during a time in which Britney did not have the “capacity” to do even the most basic of things. There may be a legal loophole dismissing her of the contract, if Rosengart chooses to explore that avenue

[Stefani]

Great just what we needed, more Glory tracks that weren't good enough to make the actual album. Just release all the Original Doll songs, queen.

[OneLife]

Although I can no longer wait for new music from her I prefer to wait another 10 years for her to release an album that she will be one hundred percent satisfied!! and not rejected songs

[GirlOnTheMoon]

I love Glory so much, I could have 1928273 versions of it. 

[S jones]

4 hours ago, Prachi said:

I had a word with some people in RCA after hearing the registration of her songs on ASCAP it turns out Britney wants to move out of this label and wants to fulfil her contract. As 12 songs have been registered, it's enough for a new album but Britney doesn't want to make another album under the label. She wants to move to Columbia records according to the people I know in this label. All of these songs was around Glory era and Britney was involved 100% as she was for Glory, though getting a song registered confirms 98% of the song official release, Britney is playing very smart and I am sure she wants people to support this project. 

It looks like it is with her full consent. 

Is it going to be a glory reissue or new album

 

[lustwecantcontrol]

Well between Glory leftovers and whatever she recorded for B10 because we know she started it I’m sure there’s more than enough for a new album. I personally would rather have an unreleased made up of tracks from throughout her career, but maybe she’s saving that for retirement. 

[S jones]

58 minutes ago, Julien62300 said:

Can’t anyone think, just a minute, that these songs are maybe not just simply « rejects » , but songs that britney really love, and never made the cut cause of the creative direction of her label/team with Glory ? 
You guys are never happy, no matter what happen it’s never enough… 

I really hope that she never read that negativity. The more important is that, soon, she will be free to create her own musical stuff, as she want, and more important, IF she wants to. 
sorry for my english, love from France 🇫🇷 !

Agree, May be these songs were orignal direction of glory and team con decided to remove them as they might have been bit controversial 

[lustwecantcontrol]

43 minutes ago, brit*****94 said:

The contract was signed while the conservatorship was in place, during a time in which Britney did not have the “capacity” to do even the most basic of things. There may be a legal loophole dismissing her of the contract, if Rosengart chooses to explore that avenue

If this is truly Britney’s idea she probably sees this as an easier option and a way to give us a little gift until she decides to record again. 
 

Also everyone *****ing about the songs being rejects....remember sometimes songs artists love don’t make albums and sometimes great songs get left off! Plus she had started recording B10 so songs from that could be included as well and they would be “new”

[gapeach704]

4 hours ago, PokemonSpears said:

Well, I know you've said before where you work, but you can't just post info like that without receipts lol 

I hope it's true, but at the same time, wasn't her contract up for 2 or 3 more albums? Glory was just the first album of the new contract

I think Britney Jean was the first album with the new contract.  Her original contract with Jive ended after FF.  I believe 

[Moscow]

16 minutes ago, Sourab Patodi said:

Is it going to be a glory reissue or new album

 

No new album, some unreleased songs off from the glory era or her older projects one I will try to get more info. 

[PokemonSpears]

4 minutes ago, gapeach704 said:

I think Britney Jean was the first album with the new contract.  Her original contract with Jive ended after FF.  I believe 

no, Britney Jean was part of the old contract. Everyone were trying to make her sign to a new label in 2012, when she was set to record "B8" because that was the last album of the contract, so she would be free afterwards. 

It was the first album released under RCA, but because it was inherited from Jive. 

Glory was the first studio album from the new contract. And people argue whether the reissues count or not. I think they don't. 

[gapeach704]

4 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said:

no, Britney Jean was part of the old contract. Everyone were trying to make her sign to a new label in 2012, when she was set to record "B8" because that was the last album of the contract, so she would be free afterwards. 

It was the first album released under RCA, but because it was inherited from Jive. 

Glory was the first studio album from the new contract. And people argue whether the reissues count or not. I think they don't. 

Gotcha.  I do believe Columbia would be a better fit.  They're going to be better for Miley too

[SlayOut]

Could these new registered songs be the ones she was recording for B10? Justin Tranter was the AR/Executive Producer for the album… and he collabs with Julia Michaels. 

[The Exhale Psychic]

4 hours ago, FreeBritBrit said:

@Britney-fan12332143 ooop not me being right

LOL