Jump to content

An attorney for USA Today has filed a 244-page document requesting public access to Britney’s next court hearing.


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, BrittonJeanSpears said:

Britney herself said she wants people to know the truth and wants to stop being her family's skeleton in the closet, so I immediately saw this just now and clapped. Good for USA Today. Team Con keeps trying to seal this shut more and more each day, and the only reason why Britney's gotten so much done in the past two months is because of being open with the public. We need full transparency. And Britney deserves it.

YES. :meryl_streep_point_yas_yes_meme_proud:

Britney said through Sam Ingham almost a year ago today: 

"At this point in her life when she is trying to regain some measure of personal autonomy, Britney welcomes and appreciates the informed support of her many fans."

Sept. 4, 2020. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-54024740

Let's go Papa Christopher, @notedyourhonor, and USA Today!!! :setfire_girl_meme_explosion_burning:

  • Love 5
Link to comment
4 hours ago, Pawnshop_ said:

If Christopher is still here, thank you!!!!!! Hopefully it’s approved so things stay more transparent.

They’ve been getting away with so much by sealing, redacting and closing everything in the past. 

Who is he? Im not familiar with him. Why is everyone hyping this up so much? Is it good news? :decisions_britney_thinking_confused_focusing_unsure_xfactor_bw_black_white:

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Good! Pressure on Penny! :rihannayas_weave_pull_cocky_smirk_proud: 

Let’s see if Penny really is this incompetent, (basically confirming, Ingham level) and deny this petition or even not remove Jamie Spears next month. 
 

Christoper will take this petition to a Supreme Court easily! The public have a right to listen to the probate court hearings. Penny’s cover up jumped out when she stopped the live audio in June and did nothing to help Britney directly when she talked about her abuse. :mhmnod_yes_agree_nodding:

  • Love 2
Link to comment
9 hours ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said:

You don't get to charge $500k for media press tours and slander campaigns,  play *** for tat in the public eye and then claim you want privacy.

 

This applies to everyone on Team Con. 

 

Jamie doesn't get to argue privacy when he attacked Britney's sons. Jamie Lynn doesn't get to argue privacy and then post videos of her crying. Jodi's lawyers don't get to say "we have a health related right to privacy" against the will of the person who this is all about.

 

It's one or the other, not both. 

 

Rosengart and Britney should support this publicly. You don't get to exploit a global icon and make her work against her will and expect the fans and audiences who made your estate to be ignorant to what happens.

 

8 hours ago, BrittonJeanSpears said:

Britney herself said she wants people to know the truth and wants to stop being her family's skeleton in the closet, so I immediately saw this just now and clapped. Good for USA Today. Team Con keeps trying to seal this shut more and more each day, and the only reason why Britney's gotten so much done in the past two months is because of being open with the public. We need full transparency. And Britney deserves it.

No transparency resulted in 13 years of suffering for Britney… Anyone that sees this as a bad thing lacks any critical thinking ability, to be really honest.

  • Love 1
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block