Britney Spears Ex Back-Up Singer Sent a Statement to Britney's Legal Team Backing Up Her Testimony

[B. Leigh]

One of Britney's ex back-up singers named Kelly Clinger posted on twitter that she sent Britney's legal team her statement that corroborated Britney's now infamous court room testimony...she was told it would have greater impact if she gave it to the court before releasing it publicly...I googled her name and it said she was on the 1999 tour and then quit so I wonder how relevant her testimony is but I hope more people come forward...

Edit:

It also looks like she is saying she signed an NDA but was able to give this testimony because she witnessed illegal activity...if this is from 99 I wonder if this has to do with Britney's father or Larry Rudolph because Britney's Testimony included both:

 

Edit 2:

I think her testimony maybe about Larry Rudolph and not Jamie...I'm actually happy about this because I think this man has more dirt than what many realize especially given the Kesha court documents that just came out:

 

[Jordan Miller]

Just now, B. Leigh said:

she was told it would have greater impact if she gave it to the court before releasing it publicly

[cocodeluxe]

Okay?

[Jordan Miller]

8 minutes ago, cocodeluxe said:

Okay?

Why did I immediately picture Whoopi 

[Alestaos]

Like if she was a recent backup singer than yeah. But when Britney was starting out in 1998-1999 she seemed okay, unless its inregards to how Jamie treated Britney then.

[B. Leigh]

1 minute ago, Alestaos said:

unless its inregards to how Jamie treated Britney then

I think this is what it has to do with because she says it has to do with Britney's testimony and she was actually in contact with Britney's legal team who took her statement and told her not to say anything until it comes out in court...so it seems it is relevant...

[B. Leigh]

20 minutes ago, Jordan Miller said:

I know that was my face too but it was Britney's legal team who said this so I guess Rosengart wants it to come out in court documents and not a twitter thread...

[MintChocoLatte]

i wish more could do that. maybe we just don't know. I'm guessing this is about how Jamie treats Britney. even though it's from a different time frame, it says a lot about him as a person and validates him needing to be removed.

[Moscow]

[Elisaaa]

It is not like Jamie started to be a **** parent circa 2008. He has always been **** parent. If there were signs of abuse any kinda during that period it has impact/evidence that Jamie never has given single **** about Britney the person . It has always been him wanting her money. 

[Peachy]

Probably evidence of them pushing medications and supplements for a “stronger” performer back then.. a lot of people have made comments about how her parents had her on adderall and other performance enhancing ***** to stay awake, perform rigorous etc.. if anything she should be in contact with rosengard 

 

 

allegedly

[rennen]

I think even saying this on twitter is too much. She shouldn't have bothered tweeting anything, IMO.

However, I hope some others in the industry have done the same and/or have been contacted by her legal team to give accounts of abuse she's suffered. It's clear it's going to take a lot to get Jamie moving.

[NewDisplayName]

I hope she is pro-Britney 

more people should give testimonies and federal court will be more suitable imo

Spoiler

 

[B. Leigh]

It also looks like she is saying she signed an NDA but was able to give this testimony because she witnessed illegal activity...if this is from 99 I wonder if this has to do with Britney's father or Larry Rudolph because Britney's Testimony included both...

[B. Leigh]

1 hour ago, John0164 said:

Probably evidence of them pushing medications and supplements for a “stronger” performer back then.. a lot of people have made comments about how her parents had her on adderall and other performance enhancing ***** to stay awake, perform rigorous etc.. if anything she should be in contact with rosengard 

 

 

allegedly

It could be this because in her tweets she alludes to signing an NDA but being able to give her statement because an NDA can't forbid you from speaking on illegal activity...since this is probably from 99 to early 2000s it likely has to deal with either her parents or Larry Rudolph just judging from Britney's testimony and who is still around her from then...

[ROL]

Oh I feel like this is what Rosengart will focus on a lot! Getting statements from people who have witnessed the abuse first hand, excited for the next court date guysss

[dfffff]

 

[dfffff]

 

[Miley6676]

12 minutes ago, ROL said:

Oh I feel like this is what Rosengart will focus on a lot! Getting statements from people who have witnessed the abuse first hand, excited for the next court date guysss

Yeah Judge Penny obviously doesn’t feel compelled to act based on Brit’s testimony and Lynn & Jodi declarations alone, so the logical next step is getting a lot of concrete evidence and witnesses for the next filing and/or hearing. 

[ElenaB]

wait so were there any illegal activities going on in 1999? like how ****ed up is this? and for how long?