Jump to content

A senior editor for US Weekly magazine shared some interesting inside info


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, SlayOut said:

US Weekly becoming the anti-TMZ! :queenflopga_walk_sass_pink: Keep the pro-Britney articles and threads coming!! :liar_red_mad_angry_anger_yell_slap:

A change in management really has done them some good. Even though they're under the same parent company as all the other celebrity tabloids (except for People. They've always been separate)

  • Like 2
Link to comment

"Housekeeper is alarmed that one of the dogs was close to death according to media outlet very pro conservatorship & Jamie. No timeline is given, source tells me it was during Britney's second vacation to Maui."

This is what I suspected.  The dogs were taken when she was out of the house for a few days as a way to hurt her.  Whoever it was (Jamie?) was doing this to get a reaction and exert power.  B came back to no dogs, and I'm sure some sort of threat/command, like, "Behave yourself and you'll get the dogs back." Team Con didn't expect B to call the cops twice to report them stolen since she's kept quiet about the abuse until now. I'm still trying to work out what happened with the phone slapping/battery incident.   Perhaps the housekeeper showed B a picture of the dogs in her own home to assuage worries that the dogs were lost or unaccounted for, and B slapped the phone away in anger?  I was in that position as a teen (my mom gave my ferret to a shelter when I was out of the house for the weekend) and I found the number of the shelter in her address book.  I shredded her address book in rage. 

 

  • Love 2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
9 hours ago, DuranDuran said:

There was info that Larry and Jeff has many connections among tabloid magazines

Yeah I hope Larry’s influence is waning in this regard. A lot of this “influence” is based off being able to leverage quid pro quo’s and use them as bargaining power (i.e. don’t publish this, will give you an exclusive on that); but seeing as Larry doesn’t have much going on right now, there’s not a lot he has to offer. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
4 hours ago, DuranDuran said:

In this case (and many others) it's Lutfi who is full of sh-t. Though maybe he meant the magazine US Weekly itself, and not her personally + she started working for US Weekly only in 2017.

Anyway, she is one of the few tabloid journalists who is pro-Britney and who wrote in her articles over the past 13 years that Britney always wanted to end her Cship.

Here is her thread as proof:

 

so it's true that she used the X Factor to tell the judge she wanted out of the conservatorship

  • Like 3
Link to comment

She said exactly what we was saying. 

Britney was always dog person, and she always treated them well.

If dogs has nannys, how come they are neglected? Those nannys bad at they job then, so it's not Britneys job.

Also, if Britney can't take care of herself (as by cship) she can't be responsible for dogs then, so they can't punish her for neglect as she is not in position to be responsible.

Dog Pup GIF

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I knew this story was bull from the get go. I wish that more outlets would call this out for what it is because it’s probably the first of many attempts to defame and smear Britney as she fights for her freedom. They have even started smearing Jason Rubin. All this tells me is that 1. Britney needs a brand new team—with no connections to her dad and 2. Team con is desperate and has a lot to hide. They can  all rot hell. 

Link to comment
4 hours ago, PokemonSpears said:

so it's true that she used the X Factor to tell the judge she wanted out of the conservatorship

yes, Britney WANTED to sign on X-Factor to prove she was capable. Not because she actually liked the job. Oh wow, a "responsible" adult (as she's a millionaire and doesn't need to be subjected to that, but regular adults do)

that always was clear to me. Britney acted in a way to prove she's capable since 2008. Doing world tours, living alone, being a judge.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
11 hours ago, DuranDuran said:

In this case (and many others) it's Lutfi who is full of sh-t. Though maybe he meant the magazine US Weekly itself, and not her personally + she started working for US Weekly only in 2017.

Anyway, she is one of the few tabloid journalists who is pro-Britney and who wrote in her articles over the past 13 years that Britney always wanted to end her Cship.

Here is her thread as proof:

 

Very interesting thanks for the info, I wonder if she has some info on Lutfi or something that would make him try to discredit her/specifically name her as an aggressor to Britney...hmmmm

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block