Jump to content

Page Six: Kevin Federline didn’t use kids as ‘pawns’ for Britney Spears’ conservatorship.


Recommended Posts

 

“Kevin was not involved in the conservatorship, and he was not an agent of the conservator or anybody on that side of the probate case,” powerhouse lawyer Mark Vincent Kaplan told us."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/pagesix.com/2021/06/30/k-fed-didnt-use-kids-as-pawns-for-britneys-conservatorship/amp/

 

*claim shes no capable but ya know, keep that money coming*

Also Jamie so freakin evil oh boy:

Kaplan added, “I don’t recall the intervention. This was 13 years ago. The decision for the conservatorship was made by Britney’s father and whoever else he was working with after she had that meltdown at the house where there was that 5150 [psychiatric] hold.”

In October 2008, Judge Reva Goetz ruled that the conservatorship would be made permanent with Jamie, now 68, serving as conservator of the person and estate. Attorney Andrew Wallet was assigned to be co-conservator of the estate to help Britney’s dad manage all of her financial affairs.'

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, MikeHunt said:

Didn't Britney write in that open letter, that the only reason she went back into the bathroom with her baby, was because a friend told something was happening outside and for them to stay there until the friend came back and said it was okay. Then that's when the police/paramedics came through the door and took her away? Like if that was truly the events, I guarantee  the following were involved in this whole set up: Lou, Jamie, Kevin, Lynne, and Sam Lutfi.

I've been saying that since the night that it happened...I was up watching it unfold on X17 and JFXOnline in real time.

 

  • Love 6
  • Like 2
Link to comment

yeah, Kaplan, we know you were complicit in the cship

It would be too bad for you if we found out something was terribly wrong at its implementation

Quote

In January 2008, after Britney locked herself in her bathroom with the former couple’s two young sons, Sean Preston and Jayden James, Federline filed for sole custody. His attorney now says his client had made that decision solely for the benefit of the kids.

“Kevin went forward with the sole custody request because he didn’t feel the children were safe,” Kaplan explained. “When somebody has children in a custody order and they lock themselves in a room and then not give them back if the police come, I mean, the other parent has to do everything they can to protect the kids. Think about how traumatic that would be for kids.”

He added, “All I recall was when she wouldn’t release the children, after Kevin showed up at the house, she locked herself in the bathroom with the boys.”

Kaplan shared that the evening prior to Britney’s meltdown, he had just taken her deposition in her and Federline’s family law case.

“We had some grave concerns, which were widely reported,” he said. “Because she withheld them, intentionally, without the authority to do so, in violation of court orders.”

[...]

When asked whether ending the conservatorship will have any effect on Britney and Federline’s current custodial agreement, Kaplan noted that any custody order in California is “always modifiable, based on the best interest of the child,” but he reiterated that his team would need more information pertaining to some of the medical care she allegedly received while under the conservatorship.

“Would the fact alone of the conservatorship being terminated in and of itself make Kevin agree to change the existing custody order? No,” he said. “Kevin needs to be able to have some information to inform his judgment on what that order should be.”

The longtime lawyer, whose career spans over 44 years, once again pointed to Britney’s claim in court that she had been put on lithium “out of nowhere” as a point of interest.

“Lithium is regarded as a very powerful psychotropic medication that isn’t cavalierly — I would hope — prescribed by a medical professional out of convenience,” he said, “so there has to be some reason for that, and we’d want to know — whatever that reason was — that that reason or condition wasn’t still impacting Britney’s judgment at the time the conservatorship, if ever, is terminated.”

Currently, Federline and Britney have a 70-30 custody agreement in the DJ’s favor, which Kaplan says “at a minimum Kevin has 70 [percent] and probably more.”

“There’s a lot of information that we don’t have, and until we have it, there’s not going to be any change of custody because the kids are doing very well with Kevin,” he added. “They see their mom, and the termination of the conservatorship in and of itself, in my view, would not be a change of circumstances warranting to change custody.

“The kids are now 14 and 15,” Kaplan said. “They’re growing up to be very dynamic young men, and the kids love their mother. As Kevin [does], they wish for her to be happy and healthy.”

It’s rumored that Britney’s attorneys are imminently set to file a formal petition to end the conservatorship. If any of the conservators contest it, the case could go to trial.

Kaplan told Page Six that Federline likely wouldn’t become involved because he “wouldn’t be someone that could offer evidence on whether it should be terminated or not” since the exes have not interacted much in recent years.

“He’s done a pretty fair job of staying away from the conservatorship and letting that side — the probate side — of that case deal with their own issues,” the attorney said. “He really doesn’t have any desire to be involved in whatever proceedings.”

 

just want to add, of course kevin knows something of the cship. and kaplan. why did they try to up child support in 2017? how were they fine with jamie so far? and now jodi. and the kids don't report strange things?????

  • Love 2
  • Like 3
Link to comment

Ok well you know what, if Britney ever feels animosity towards him, later on the kids will ask and see what’s up. “Mom why don’t you speak to Dad?” That says a whole lot about Kevin. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, MikeHunt said:

Didn't Britney write in that open letter, that the only reason she went back into the bathroom with her baby, was because a friend told something was happening outside and for them to stay there until the friend came back and said it was okay. Then that's when the police/paramedics came through the door and took her away? Like if that was truly the events, I guarantee  the following were involved in this whole set up: Lou, Jamie, Kevin, Lynne, and Sam Lutfi.

This explains her confused face as they rolled her out of the house. I hate them all. 

  • Love 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
4 hours ago, MikeHunt said:

Didn't Britney write in that open letter, that the only reason she went back into the bathroom with her baby, was because a friend told something was happening outside and for them to stay there until the friend came back and said it was okay. Then that's when the police/paramedics came through the door and took her away? Like if that was truly the events, I guarantee  the following were involved in this whole set up: Lou, Jamie, Kevin, Lynne, and Sam Lutfi.

Ok come on, is Britney really that gullible? 

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block