Jump to content

Question about Jamie


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

that's an interesting question. If the companies are under his name, he may not be legally obligated to give them back. They may even have the papers "in order" that prove he acquired them "legal

Jamie created new LLC's for himself and Andrew Wallet. For the most part, he's not using the LLC's that were part of the SJB Revocable Trust...They're new. That's where it gets legally murky

That's murky legal territory as well. Jodi is only "temporary" conservator of the person... But Jamie hasn't officially resigned. I suspect that's going to be Rosengart's first move...To mak

that's an interesting question.

If the companies are under his name, he may not be legally obligated to give them back. They may even have the papers "in order" that prove he acquired them "legally" from Britney. 

That's the whole scam that Rosengart needs to investigate. 

  • Love 5
  • Like 3

 I am a performer. I am a Mom. I am funny. I am your friend! I am Britney Jean

Link to post
11 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said:

that's an interesting question.

If the companies are under his name, he may not be legally obligated to give them back. They may even have the papers "in order" that prove he acquired them "legally" from Britney. 

That's the whole scam that Rosengart needs to investigate. 

Scary 

Link to post

This might be a really stupid question, but if Jamie is removed before the conservatorship ends, could the conservatorship over her finances possibly end so she gets control of her money and gets to make decisions? 

Could be a conflict with her still having a conservatorship of her person. Just don’t know if one is possible without the other. 

Link to post
  • Exhale+
5 minutes ago, Lost In Space said:

This might be a really stupid question, but if Jamie is removed before the conservatorship ends, could the conservatorship over her finances possibly end so she gets control of her money and gets to make decisions? 

Could be a conflict with her still having a conservatorship of her person. Just don’t know if one is possible without the other. 

he is the person who controls both currently. 

 

2020-03-09 - 2020-07-17 

Removal of officer ANDREW M. WALLET, director

is on the website

so maybe he would be removed too

Link to post
6 minutes ago, Lost In Space said:

This might be a really stupid question, but if Jamie is removed before the conservatorship ends, could the conservatorship over her finances possibly end so she gets control of her money and gets to make decisions? 

Could be a conflict with her still having a conservatorship of her person. Just don’t know if one is possible without the other. 

I don't think they will end the conservatorship of the estate before ending the conservatorship of the person, it doesn't make sense 

Link to post
1 minute ago, Steel Magnolia said:

Jamie created new LLC's for himself and Andrew Wallet.

For the most part, he's not using the LLC's that were part of the SJB Revocable Trust...They're new.

That's where it gets legally murky.

Why creating new LLC's ? 

Link to post
3 minutes ago, Lucian85 said:

Why creating new LLC's ? 


I don't know...

Maybe Jamie is personally profiting off of them?

Or maybe he realizes that he's in murky legal territory with their "hybrid business model" so he's giving himself some wiggle room?

It's hard to say what his justification was for doing that.

  • Like 1
Link to post
  • Exhale+
24 minutes ago, Lucian85 said:

Jodi controls the conservatorship of the person 

Don't they share? She is co-conservator. Or what's what Emily B Baker has been saying. I've watched almost all her law videos.

Link to post
6 minutes ago, Kevney said:

Don't they share? She is co-conservator. Or what's what Emily B Baker has been saying. I've watched almost all her law videos.

That's murky legal territory as well.

Jodi is only "temporary" conservator of the person... But Jamie hasn't officially resigned.

I suspect that's going to be Rosengart's first move...To make the legal lines clear so Jodi and Jamie can't point fingers at each other like they're currently doing through their court submissions.

  • Like 2
Link to post
On 7/20/2021 at 9:00 PM, Lucian85 said:

Will Jamie lose all his power over Britney Brands and business, once he is kicked out the conservatorship ? 

So Britney Brands will be owned by the new conservator of the estate, even if it's a bank ? 

Anyone knows how that business stuff works ? 

https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_la/34762115D

God, how sick. You are literally asking about slavery. You are not sick, the arrangement is. How is it legal in America that conserved people work and earn millions and millions?! That should automatically disqualify the conservatorship. Frustrated Selina Meyer GIF

Link to post
34 minutes ago, Kevney said:

Don't they share? She is co-conservator. Or what's what Emily B Baker has been saying. I've watched almost all her law videos.

She is conservator of the person 

He is conservator of the estate 

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block