DuranDuran Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 My opinion that it was written by her and not by her at the same time. If they mix truth with falsehood, it's easier to fool people into believing that this is 100% her posting. We must not forget that as long as she needs to submit her posts for approval and as long as her account legally does not belong to her, means she can still be censored. And what's important that they won't break any laws by doing it. Why I think this is only partly her post? Cuz team con is not only James and JL. And even though James is a monster, but he is still only a pawn + Britney herself said in her testimony that her management played a huge role. And that they should all go to jail for what they did. She also did not specifically single out anyone from her family in her testimony, she said several times no one from her whole family did anything to help her. But this post focuses heavily on only two of the public's most hated people. Juno and Colon. So yes, I still think that this post was edited to some extent by team con to distract or/and spin the narrative. 3 Link to comment
mangotango Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 4 minutes ago, Easy There said: Just read comments on DM and most ppl are dragging her over this post. Sorry, what is DM? I am guessing another forum? Link to comment
Matou Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 4 minutes ago, Easy There said: Just read comments on DM and most ppl are dragging her over this post. I see nothing but praises 1 Link to comment
The Finn Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Another proof that this post was made by Britney: Paris Hilton hanged out with her multiple times last summer with their mutual friend Kate. She posted on her IG “we’re coming to save you” (I’m paraphrasing) about the same time Madonna posted her “we’re going to get you out of the prison” message in IG. Within a couple of days we heard Britney was going to hire Mathew Rosengart who came highly recommended and has worked with Madonna (and is Sean Penn’s lawyer). Now Paris commented on Britney’s post “Yes live your life beautiful! 😍 You deserve your happiness! 🙌🏻“ And Madonna has liked Britney’s post as well. I would say Paris knows Britney much better than any of us and most likely is been kept up to date on what is going on in Britney’s life right now. I don’t think Britney still has direct access to her Instagram but I do think Cassie & co have been told that the can’t censor Britney’s posts anymore. 2 1 Link to comment
mangotango Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Just now, DuranDuran said: My opinion that it was written by her and not by her at the same time. If they mix truth with falsehood, it's easier to fool people that this is 100% her posting. We must not forget that as long as she needs to submit her posts for approval and as long as her account legally does not belong to her, means she can still be censored. And what's important that they won't break any laws by doing it. Why I think this is only partly her post? Cuz team con is not only James and JL. And even though James is a monster, but he is still only a pawn. + Britney herself said in her testimony that her management played a huge role. And that they should all go to jail for what they did. She also did not specifically single out anyone from her family in her testimony, she said several times no one from her whole family did anything to help her. But this post focuses heavily on only two of the public's most hated people. Juno and Colon. So yes, I still think that this post was edited to some extent by team con to distract or/and spin the narrative. Yes, this is my feeling too currently. It also makes it more difficult for, for exmpale, Rosengart or Britney to state simply whether she is behind the IG posts or not. She likely is behind it to some extent, but what/who is being left out? And why is it being left out? 1 Link to comment
allenlovesbritney Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Is this her most-commented IG post? It currently has 108k comments 😱 1 Link to comment
Matou Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 1 minute ago, The Finn said: Another proof that this post was made by Britney: Paris Hilton hanged out with her multiple times last summer with their mutual friend Kate. She posted on her IG “we’re coming to save you” (I’m paraphrasing) about the same time Madonna posted her “we’re going to get you out of the prison” message in IG and within a couple of days we heard Britney was going to hire Mathew Rosengart who came highly recommended and has worked with Madonna (and is Sean Penn’s lawyer). Now Paris commented on Britney’s post “Yes live your life beautiful! 😍 You deserve your happiness! 🙌🏻“ And Madonna has liked Britney’s post as well. I don’t think she still has direct access to her Instagram but I do think Cassie & co have been told that the can’t censor Britney’s posts anymore. Yes we don't know what's going on behind the doors & I wnat to believe ppl are helping her. Paris seems a true fan considering Britney almost "shade" her story in her testimony. Idk why but I don't trust Madonna to help Britney ... Don't forget the ACLU support for Britney I can't find a proof of this statement but if it's the case, thsi can explain why her IG posts are suddenly being more "real" Link to comment
Easy There Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 17 minutes ago, Matou said: I see nothing but praises Check top comments where ppl are calling her unhinged. How she is gonna self destruct etc. Link to comment
Easy There Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 18 minutes ago, mangotango said: Sorry, what is DM? I am guessing another forum? Dailymail one of the biggest British "newspaper" showbiz pages. There is almost 2k comments Link to comment
mangotango Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 6 minutes ago, Matou said: Don't forget the ACLU support for Britney I can't find a proof of this statement but if it's the case, thsi can explain why her IG posts are suddenly being more "real" Yes and I hope this is true that she has been able to get unrestricted access to the internet. But let's be very clear that that does not include access to and control of her IG. Because she doesn't own the IG, whoever does are in the legal right to deny her access. Doesn't mean she doesn't have access, but any access is what is given to her not her choice based on having greater internet access. Link to comment
mangotango Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 1 minute ago, Easy There said: Dailymail one of the biggest British "newspaper" showbiz pages. There is almost 2k comments Oh, duh! Sorry, didn't make the connection at all. But Daily Mail is particularly horrendous though, they are like their own breed tbh, commenters included. I think overall the post has been received mostly positively. 1 Link to comment
Leader Jordan Miller Posted July 18, 2021 Leader Share Posted July 18, 2021 6 hours ago, Lucian85 said: Britney would be angry at her father, not at her sister's damn performance from 2016. She would talk about her lack of freedom, not her freakin dancing videos. I think it’s important we don’t assume what Britney would or wouldn’t say. By saying this isn’t her, it’s kind of another way of her being silenced. :/ 5 1 Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | TikTok | YouTube Link to comment
Matou Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 1 minute ago, mangotango said: Yes and I hope this is true that she has been able to get unrestricted access to the internet. But let's be very clear that that does not include access to and control of her IG. Because she doesn't own the IG, whoever does are in the legal right to deny her access. Doesn't mean she doesn't have access, but any access is what is given to her not her choice based on having greater internet access. I think she doesn't have a direct access to her IG, but if it's true TeamCon can't limite what she is writing bc her new lawyer can sue them for not respecting this ... We have to wait, I believe Rosengart is doing a good job, just look what he said in court comparing to what Ingham has done since 13 years ... Link to comment
oscar0 Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 it's so funny that he criticizes his fans who went to las vegas to get drunk and smoke w**d lol and got high from the smell lol Link to comment
mangotango Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 Just now, Matou said: I think she doesn't have a direct access to her IG, but if it's true TeamCon can't limite what she is writing bc her new lawyer can sue them for not respecting this ... We have to wait, I believe Rosengart is doing a good job, just look what he said in court comparing to what Ingham has done since 13 years ... No, they can't sue specifically for not allowing her to access or post unedited on the IG. Because the IG is not hers, technically, it is owned by an LLC which Jamie is the president of. The LLC is therefore able to decide who has access and what can be posted. This is perfectly legal, which is why they can't sue them for her not having access. However, the set up can be challenged both when they challenge the cship and Jamie as a whole (if it is found that it should never have been in place, it puts anything set up under the cship in question), and some other potential venues. But either way, currently is perfectly legal for them to both lock her out of the IG and edit anything she tries to post. Her having a right to unrestricted internet does not include accounts which she doesn't own. 1 Link to comment
Matou Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 2 minutes ago, mangotango said: No, they can't sue specifically for not allowing her to access or post unedited on the IG. Because the IG is not hers, technically, it is owned by an LLC which Jamie is the president of. The LLC is therefore able to decide who has access and what can be posted. This is perfectly legal, which is why they can't sue them for her not having access. However, the set up can be challenged both when they challenge the cship and Jamie as a whole (if it is found that it should never have been in place, it puts anything set up under the cship in question), and some other potential venues. But either way, currently is perfectly legal for them to both lock her out of the IG and edit anything she tries to post. Her having a right to unrestricted internet does not include accounts which she doesn't own. Technically. Then this doesn't make sense to me. Why this post was even posted ? Why can't they just ignore what she sends then ? And if it's not her at all, this also doesn't make sense calling their cship abusive. Link to comment
MysticWomaney Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 I love that billy b is now back Peddling and criticising the docs he was so supportive and a part of. britney you tell them and you be as angry as you want. Thank you for feeling like you can now have your voice. your real fans always supporter you and never criticised your videos which you evidently made yourself and I’m so glad you’re confident enough to still share them with us work ***** (for you not for daddy not for anyone for you) 1 Link to comment
mangotango Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, Matou said: Technically. Then this doesn't make sense to me. Why this post was even posted ? Why can't they just ignore what she sends then ? And if it's not her at all, this also doesn't make sense calling their cship abusive. I can't give you any answer to that, I think that is the core of why there is confusion about this all. I am just saying how it works legally in regards to the IG. I can give you a list of potential reasons, ranging from them simply having letting her have access and given up to team con editing it heavily and working an angle, some less credible than others, but in any case we won't be able to know what is the truth until it is stated explicitly. 1 Link to comment
oscar0 Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 16 hours ago, TomasBR said: Entonces, en otras palabras, Britney necesita ser perfecta para que puedas sentirte cómoda. ¡Relájate, por favor! En serio, vuelve a leer el mensaje de Britney porque creo que mucho de él estaba dirigido a personas como tú. Tal vez esa sea la razón por la que te incomoda ... This. It seems that many "fans" want that perfect britney from 1998-2002 back, that "britney" manufactured as the ultimate woman / girl who ended up making her sick. They don't realize that that was never the real Britney. And it is incredible that it continues to bother the public as it did from 2004 onwards. Link to comment
Easy There Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 32 minutes ago, mangotango said: Oh, duh! Sorry, didn't make the connection at all. But Daily Mail is particularly horrendous though, they are like their own breed tbh, commenters included. I think overall the post has been received mostly positively. They have been nothing but supportive since testimony. I was actually shocked by comments regarding her latest instagram posts. Link to comment
Recommended Posts