Ronan Farrow & Jia discuss their New Yorker article and state that Team Con tried to claim that Britney no longer has capacity

[Urbanney]

So they’re admitting for the last decade she HAS had capacity? Which is saying she didn’t need the conservatorship then? But now she conveniently does. Okay.

All these lawyers and yet they still don’t know their *** from a hole in the ground. I’ve only ever taken one law class and I have more logic and rationale than they do.

[mmseventy]

It’s so clear that they will just say whatever they think covers their *** at any given time. Like others have said, does that mean they’re saying she DID have capacity before - if so why was she still in the conservatorship?? And it’s such a blatant and convenient lie from them. They know a ton of people are now saying “why is she still in this when she apparently has the capacity to perform and make millions of dollars” - so now they’re conveniently saying “oh actually she’s gotten a lot worse since then.” Everyone heard her speak and she sounded coherent af, and if she did get any worse it’s because of what they’ve put her through these past two years! 

[Marcanthony]

I'm 15mins in but it's nothing new but they are very passionate about this case which is heartwarming.

So i wondered why these two journalist giving an interview on a random youtube channel but apparently those two guys are engaged lol

[Alleyesonus_]

On a completely different note... Ronan is 100% my type 

[Brenton]

So basically when she doesn’t do as they say she lacks capacity …  do they know what capacity means?

[Villanelle]

They can't claim she lacks capacity when THIS is the man they work for. This is the man in charge. No matter what mental health issues Britney has she has more capacity than a twice bankrupt abusive alcoholic who is delusional enough to believe he is britney spears. 

I hope these two continue to be on Britney's side and write more articles exposing team con. You can see they actually care. 

[femmepop]

Great Convo!

Britney was never given the chance to fully be her OWN person. But she was always rebelling from that system and constantly punished for trying.  It's time to break that cycle and let her start fresh. Let her go, and just listen✨🧚‍♀️✨

so happy and overwhelmed that Britney FINALLY has the public and journalists in her corner that see her as a person with HUMAN RIGHTS. Whatever you think of Ronan and Jia as journalists, it's still pretty huge that she has these media heavyweights as leaders of the conversation now.

The narrative is really turning around in Britney's favor and I hope that she comes out of this on top and having the last word.

[Sea flower]

Very good point from Jia "if something Britney said on her testimony is proven wrong, they will use this argument to invalidate the whole testimony". but as she mentions "even in the case all her testimony is a lie, this also proves her capacity".

[ICouldntThinkOfOne]

2 hours ago, blahbety said:

Well there you go folks - that explains her Instagram posts!

What a vile ignorant comment. 

 

If you knew anything about this situation, you would know that they used the no capacity ***** when she was doing international tours and the only reason they're using it now is to try and justify her protesting by not working.

Britney clearly had the capacity to do a Vegas show, and even when she was forced onto medication, they still planned to promote the show later, they planned on letting her make public appearances at The Zone, as well as go to movie premiers.

You're genuinely a remorseless individual if you're using her Instagram as a grounds to justify her capacity. Vile and deserves to banned by mods.

 

 

[jordeezy river red]

Allegedly, they always gaslit her this way - in their minds, she is "crazy" for not appreciating her career. It's gaslighting. Britney's career was a lot of people's investment and they are upset that the person they invested in felt pressured into doing it to the point that they got burnt out. They need to MOVE ON and allow HER to move on. 

[blahbety]

56 minutes ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said:

What a vile ignorant comment. 

 

If you knew anything about this situation, you would know that they used the no capacity ***** when she was doing international tours and the only reason they're using it now is to try and justify her protesting by not working.

Britney clearly had the capacity to do a Vegas show, and even when she was forced onto medication, they still planned to promote the show later, they planned on letting her make public appearances at The Zone, as well as go to movie premiers.

You're genuinely a remorseless individual if you're using her Instagram as a grounds to justify her capacity. Vile and deserves to banned by mods.

 

 

Tone it down with the dramatics. It was meant in the way: they say she lacks capacity and they are trying to prove it through Instagram.

I’m aware of what’s going on… I would look up post history before making sweeping baseless statements, if I were you.

[ICouldntThinkOfOne]

1 minute ago, blahbety said:

Tone it down with the dramatics. It was meant in the way: they say she lacks capacity and they are trying to prove it through Instagram.

I’m aware of what’s going on… I would look up post history before making sweeping baseless statements, if I were you.

I apologise for misinterpreting your statement, I hope you can regonise why I did and how easily it could have been misinterpretted.

In that framing, alongside the fact that she couldn't get access to personal service, yes I agree.

Ps. not being petty, but they're not dramatics, there's been enough debate on here for months about her instagram being weaponised against her.

[Anabia]

3 hours ago, blahbety said:

Well there you go folks - that explains her Instagram posts!

She doesn't control her Instagram and they use it as a tool to justify the conservatorship. 

[Onyxgirl17]

Really powerful discussion. I hope they continue digging. 

[dora pora]

I just want Britney to be free already and for all her abusers to be locked up. 

[Itscuzim31]

36 minutes ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said:

I apologise for misinterpreting your statement, I hope you can regonise why I did and how easily it could have been misinterpretted.

In that framing, alongside the fact that she couldn't get access to personal service, yes I agree.

Ps. not being petty, but they're not dramatics, there's been enough debate on here for months about her instagram being weaponised against her.

LOL not you justifying acting like a ******* psychopath after some bs apology. @blahbety completely in the right. 

[Oprah Winfrey.]

4 hours ago, SlayOut said:

Yas Ronan and Jia!  Listening now!

UPDATE:

I appreciate their interest in Britney’s case. They didn’t reveal much new information, but I think they did a good job at highlighting points made in the article. Especially questioning Sam Ingham’s loyalty/duty to Britney. I also appreciate how they underscored that Britney’s strengths have been used by Team Con to undermine her/prove that she needs a conservatorship arrangement. In general, I think they do a good job at pointing out the inconsistencies in Team Con’s argument.

I really hope they’re working on a Part 2!

I must say it’s quite annoying that no one took any of this seriously until she spoke…are we that mean and not empathetic enough to see that something was clearly not right with Britney when she would perform and do red carpets. Like everyone saw that she looked like a deer in headlights so why did we all continue to torture her!!!

[Martian_M00d]

Thanks for bringing this interview to my attention! I supremely enjoyed their analysis on the situation, and framed her fame in a way I haven't put into words before. Nicely done

[Onyxgirl17]

3 hours ago, Urbanney said:

So they’re admitting for the last decade she HAS had capacity? Which is saying she didn’t need the conservatorship then? But now she conveniently does. Okay.

All these lawyers and yet they still don’t know their *** from a hole in the ground. I’ve only ever taken one law class and I have more logic and rationale than they do.

The so called “team” mention a “degenerative” condition and that she would “harm herself” without the Conservatorship. I really love how they pointed out how people are allowed generally to do what they want even if it’s not in their best interests. Why does Britney have to be subjected to what other people believe are her “best interest” when she clearly has shown she is high functioning? Excellent points and deep questions here. 

[hallucinate]

It was illuminating to hear Ronan talk about his interactions with team con. I don’t buy their claim that she has a degenerative condition that would prevent her from doing Vegas today. Even if it was some form of dementia (which is what they seem to be implying), she wouldn’t have been able to prepare or deliver that testimony as well as she did. Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if her “grave medical diagnosis” doesn’t even exist.