Jump to content

There is no evidence Britney abused illicit drugs.


Recommended Posts

She could have been abusing prescription drugs. But there’s never been any solid proof of drug use. That would be something basically only she would know and those around her if the in fact witnessed/took part in it. 

  • Love 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
1 hour ago, AP4 said:

She could have been abusing prescription drugs. But there’s never been any solid proof of drug use. That would be something basically only she would know and those around her if the in fact witnessed/took part in it. 

Well many people from that time agree-paparazzi, media reports etc... she was taking prescription drugs back in 2007-2008 but my main point is that she was never abusing drugs like co****e or m*** or things like that, and the reporting from back then also supports this.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, chizwhiz said:

The judge in the child custody case publicly said that she was a 'habitual, frequent and continual' user of substances. They used that to take primary custody off her before the cship existed.

That doesn't mean anything and what he said isn't evidence; the judge in Britney's conservatorship case cited Britney having dementia as a basis to put her in a conservatorship...

 

  • Love 2
  • Like 2
Link to comment

You have no evidence. Just “reportedly” “according to TMZ” “an insider said blah blah blah.” :whitney_houston_huh_oh_really_well_look_stare_welp:

We don’t have any evidence-medical records, doctor testimony, etc.- that either proves or disproves that she used drugs. Just like we don’t have access to her private medical information.

If she used drugs, she has obviously worked to be drug-free. But we also don’t know and don’t have special access to her day to day life.

  • Love 1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
9 minutes ago, SlayOut said:

You have no evidence. Just “reportedly” “according to TMZ” “an insider said blah blah blah.” :whitney_houston_huh_oh_really_well_look_stare_welp:

We don’t have any evidence-medical records, doctor testimony, etc.- that either proves or disproves that she used drugs. Just like we don’t have access to her private medical information.

If she used drugs, she has obviously worked to be drug-free. But we also don’t know and don’t have special access to her day to day life.

I don't want to know about her medical records; but Ronan Farrow's article is the piece that again suggested she took illicit drugs, not my post.

And I didn't just quote TMZ; at the end of the day, Britney was the most scrutinized person in the world and both the media and paparazzi consistently reported that she tested negative for illicit drugs that whole period.

Anything to suggest otherwise would be slanderous since Britney herself said in For The Record that drug use was not her problem during that time.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
3 hours ago, chizwhiz said:

The judge in the child custody case publicly said that she was a 'habitual, frequent and continual' user of substances. They used that to take primary custody off her before the cship existed.

And that was something they pulled off their ***** because

-they clearly had no proof as the custom say they would have to take custody away from her, which didn't happen after Commissary Gordon said that

-she came clean on her random drug tests

  • Like 1
Link to comment

MTE. I don't but for me it's so hard to believe Britney was addited to drugs, it just doesn't seem like her :decisions_britney_thinking_confused_focusing_unsure_xfactor_bw_black_white: But I think she had a problem with amphetamine right? Idk but coc.aine seems too much for being Britney.

Link to comment

It really shouldn’t matter to anyone if she had substance abuse problems especially if she no longer has those problems. Before Kevin it was hinted she had at least experimented with drugs and she seemed to be high in chaotic although maybe that’s just her personality. In the end the only one that can confirm that is her and she doesn’t have to if it’s true or not. She owes no explanations if she doesn’t want to give them about anything people speculate about. 
 

 

Link to comment

I want to know if Kevin passed the same tests. I am sure they smoked w**d together while married but then it came to child custody and money only Britneys drug using was checked. Kevin played her dirty. He knew he'll get big paycheck if he'll get sole custody and she only will have visits. I do not believe he wanted 50/50 but things went wrong. I believe he and his lawyer knew how to make it in his favour. He saw she was a good mother. But still took away her kids and he was the reason she end up in 5150. As she just wanted kids to stay with her. 

  • Love 1
  • Like 5
Link to comment
9 hours ago, zxcvb said:

That doesn't mean anything and what he said isn't evidence; the judge in Britney's conservatorship case cited Britney having dementia as a basis to put her in a conservatorship...

 

This is a totally different court case with different evidence and witnesses. They don't give custody over hearsay, I'm going to say there was evidence. 

 

Link to comment

Whether she did drugs a few times for fun or whether she actually abused drugs doesn’t really matter in my opinion.  And even if she abused them doesn’t have to mean she was physically addicted. But my point is, they’re chaining her to that, acting like if they let her free she’d immediately go and do it again. I can’t know for sure obviously but I believe whatever medications they abused her with over the years has had worse effects than whatever drugs she might have done. She talked about lasting trauma herself. Drug addicts, whether Britney was one or not, are just people like everyone else and perfectly capable of recovering and leading healthy lives. If I were to make a guess I’d say she probably tried the hard stuff a few times because such is Hollywood but then might have abused prescription drugs and I do honestly believe those people gave it to her too. Either way, most important thing is I think that we know Britney never did any of those  things around her kids, or at least so far people who were around that time say she never did and I believe that. 

 

Link to comment

Something happened for them to be able to claim all this stuff about medical records and her privacy and what not against her. They are 1000% using that against her, which has probably backed them up for most of this conservatorship. They do mention a sealed medical record that will not be released to public.  
 

Here’s my thoughts: at one point during 2006-2007 I believe Britney may have been allegedly playing with prescription pills or substances. There had to of been something that she was into that caused the courts to use that against her. She also mentioned that she’s gone to AA meetings. Not to mention all of the rehabs and therapy centres they have sent her to. 
 

Regardless of whatever happened with Britney then, it’s nobody business and they shouldn’t be able to use that against her. We can make mistakes in life and grow as a person and shouldn’t have something labeled onto us forever, which is what I believe is happening with her. Something she did was able to kick start this conservatorship. I also don’t believe for a second the sealed medical record that they were given was the dementia file because we all know that claim is FALSE. 
 

if there was a substance abuse problem, then yes she needs to have someone who will keep her on track. Let’s stop acting like she has some drug addiction and let her learn from her mistakes without being in a prison. 
 

OR is this story made up by team con to keep her in the conservatorship? Remember the doctor that passed away? Could he have potentially been in on this to sign off on it? Allegedly. 

Link to comment
6 hours ago, icybaby said:

I want to know if Kevin passed the same tests. I am sure they smoked w**d together while married but then it came to child custody and money only Britneys drug using was checked. Kevin played her dirty. He knew he'll get big paycheck if he'll get sole custody and she only will have visits. I do not believe he wanted 50/50 but things went wrong. I believe he and his lawyer knew how to make it in his favour. He saw she was a good mother. But still took away her kids and he was the reason she end up in 5150. As she just wanted kids to stay with her. 

This makes me so sad :( 

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block