Jump to content

New BreatheHeavy live stream TODAY at 3:30 pm PT

One-click subscribe to our YouTube channel!

Sam Asghari saw The US Congress' open letter to Britney


Recommended Posts

I have a question for the US fans. What do you think it’s better, accept the proposal despite who is signing the letter or deny it because of it? Is it really that bad? Sorry but I’m not really informed about US politics :enigma_alien_blue:.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
6 minutes ago, Andros said:

So she’ll know about this 

but will she accept ? 

Why not ? It's exposure & she talked about how is it possible the state of CA let this happen to her. Imo it's a chance to change this. This will be MASSIVE ! :scalped_wind_storm_blowing_sand_dirt_desert_holding_on:

No one will never say "oh it's Britney, how is it possible things she said are real?"

She wants people to listen and believe her, because I think she has more to say.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
Just now, K3yN said:

I have a question for the US fans. What do you think it’s better, accept the proposal despite who is signing the letter or deny it because of it? Is it really that bad? Sorry but I’m not very informed about US politics :enigma_alien_blue:.

Who cares who signs ? This is not about it but her to tell her story

  • Love 2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
1 hour ago, K3yN said:

I have a question for the US fans. What do you think it’s better, accept the proposal despite who is signing the letter or deny it because of it? Is it really that bad? Sorry but I’m not really informed about US politics :enigma_alien_blue:.

I think that this meeting is all political theater for a few reasons:

  1. The signatories of the letter are all embroiled in some form of scandal. Matt Gaetz for s** trafficking, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been stripped of all House committee assignments for promoting political violence against her colleagues, among her other incendiary/horrible comments, Andy Biggs has perpetuated the Big Lie (aka election was stolen, and Burgess Owens is new to Congress and doesn’t have much experience…
  2. The letter does not indicate that she is speaking to a specific committee in the House of Representatives. And they do not have power to let her speak to the full House or Senate.
  3. Due to Point 2, it’s unclear if her testimony will be public or even submitted to the Congressional record.
  4. None of them are representatives in California, where her conservatorship is based. Therefore, they cannot change California law based on whatever Britney says. They could potential start legislation at the federal level, but I’m not sure if they’re on the appropriate committees to make that happen.
  5. His letter is addressed to “Ms. Britney Spears” with her address being in “Beverley Hills, CA 90210.” She obviously does not live there.

In my opinion, it seems like they’re trying to capitalize off of Britney’s testimony for their own gain (they hate California because it’s run by Democrats, so why not drag the California court system using Britney’s story as proof) and to distract from their own political issues.

TLDR; Don’t fall for the grift. :staysalty_hands_rub_so_there_blue_walk_away_made_my_point:

  • Like 6
Link to comment
13 minutes ago, SlayOut said:

I think that this meeting is all political theater for a few reasons:

  1. The signatories of the letter are all embroiled in some form of scandal. Matt Gaetz for s** trafficking, Marjorie Taylor Greene has been stripped of all House committee assignments for promoting political violence against her colleagues, among her other incendiary/horrible comments, Andy Biggs has perpetuated the Big Lie (aka election was stolen, and Burgess Owens is new to Congress and doesn’t have much experience…
  2. The letter does not indicate that she is speaking to a specific committee in the House of Representatives. And they do not have power to let her speak to the full House or Senate.
  3. Due to Point 2, it’s unclear if her testimony will be public or even submitted to the Congressional record.
  4. None of them are representatives in California, where her conservatorship is based. Therefore, they cannot change California law based on whatever Britney says. They could potential start legislation at the federal level, but I’m not sure if they’re on the appropriate committees to make that happen.
  5. His letter is addressed to “Ms. Britney Spears” with her address being in “Beverley Hills, CA 90210.” She obviously does not live there.

In my opinion, it seems like they’re trying to capitalize off of Britney’s testimony for their own gain (they hate California because it’s run by Democrats, so why not drag the California court system using Britney’s story as proof) and to distract from their own political issues.

Thanks for the detailed explanation!:cooltshirt_thumbs_up_britney_pom_piece_of_me:

  • Love 1
Link to comment
24 minutes ago, SlayOut said:

In my opinion, it seems like they’re trying to capitalize off of Britney’s testimony for their own gain (they hate California because it’s run by Democrats, so why not drag the California court system using Britney’s story as proof) and to distract from their own political issues.

TLDR; Don’t fall for the grift. :staysalty_hands_rub_so_there_blue_walk_away_made_my_point:

Omg my naive @ss didn't even think of that...:selenerz_selena_crying_tears_sad: Great explanation btw!

  • Haha 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, K3yN said:

I have a question for the US fans. What do you think it’s better, accept the proposal despite who is signing the letter or deny it because of it? Is it really that bad? Sorry but I’m not really informed about US politics :enigma_alien_blue:.

I think she should go. Ultimately, all politicians provoke controversy or disagreements. Nevertheless, speaking to Congress could be an even bigger turning point for this situation than the recent court conversation.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block