Jump to content

Jodi Montgomery releases a statement on her website


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, thedoughboy said:

I don't understand either....it sounds like she's saying bc britney has a preexisting condition (mental illness?) that she was at increased risk of catching the virus.......last time I checked just cause you go a mental illness doesn't increase your chance of catching a virus

yall I'm pretty sure Britney has asthma

we see her with an inhaler lots of times

this is the first thing that comes to mind...NOT her mental illness lol

  • Like 3
Link to comment

If Britney got married wouldn't her spouse basically be her caregiver and be able to overrule any c/ship. 

Dont spouses have the legal right to make health decisions if their wife / husband is incapacitated? Like turn off the life support or consent to emergency surgery... If that's the case why wouldn't britney's spouse if she can get married be able to overrule and nullify a conservatorship using the same rights?

 

Or is American law different than commonwealth nation's?

Link to comment

So what she is implying is that Britney’s request for an IUD is a new procedure and Jaime is the one that has to approve it. Also, seems like they are washing their hands of the conservatorship not limiting Britney’s ability to marry, but again, no one tells Britney anything. Sounds like damage control. I really hope Brit can get out of this soon, she deserves to have her life back 

Link to comment
38 minutes ago, Armchairrevolution said:

If Britney got married wouldn't her spouse basically be her caregiver and be able to overrule any c/ship. 

Dont spouses have the legal right to make health decisions if their wife / husband is incapacitated? Like turn off the life support or consent to emergency surgery... If that's the case why wouldn't britney's spouse if she can get married be able to overrule and nullify a conservatorship using the same rights?

 

Or is American law different than commonwealth nation's?

Not necessarily. Ordinarily, one would be able to make decisions for themselves such as signing a DNR if they become incapacitated to the point that there is a very slim chance of recovery. However, if one does not make any choice either way, I'm pretty sure the spouse would be responsible for deciding.

However, Britney's case is unusual in that she legally can't make these decisions for herself, so her conservators basically have the final say. It's really, REALLY, messed up.

Link to comment

It's pathetic how both sides are lying and saying they are doing everything to care for Britney and protect her , after claiming she has a mental condition which she doesn't even have (dimentia) and Britney herself made it clear these people are abusing her but they still choose to lie and not take responsibility . I can't with those evil people anymore :liar_red_mad_angry_anger_yell_slap:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
6 hours ago, IForgotYouExisted said:

Keep throwing dirt at each other. I love it. They about to FALL DOWN.

 

Not as long as the corrupt judge is the 1 taking care of the case , morals are not her priority , it's all about the money and at the end of the day these evil fkers are paying (with Britney's money) the judge we need to stop hoping and actually do something to make things move , we need to contact really important people and make a lot of noise .

Link to comment

*** covering if I have ever seen it, blaming Jamie Spears for everything, as if the redneck is some kind of mastermind and as if Jodi's role isn't to act in the conservate's best interests and advocate for her client. There is going to be alot of finger pointing as the movement proceeds and details come to light.

Link to comment
18 hours ago, Slave4yew said:

jodi.jpg.e266169f3c0aa4fa680d2bb7fd377f02.jpgSTATEMENT BY LAURIANN WRIGHT, WRIGHT KIM DOUGLAS, ALC,

ATTORNEY FOR JODI MONTGOMERY, TEMPORARY CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON

June 30, 2021

“The conservatorship of the person for Britney Spears includes multiple layers of protection for Britney, including the Court, the court investigator which regularly updates the Court, her medical team, and my client, Jodi Montgomery.  In fact, conservatorships in California are subject to the strictest laws in the nation to protect against any potential abuses, including a licensing requirement for all professional fiduciaries.  Ms. Montgomery is a licensed private professional fiduciary who, unlike family members who serve as conservators, is required to follow a Code of Ethics which can be found here: https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Browse/Home/California/CaliforniaCodeofRegulations?guid=I474208F0D49111DEBC02831C6D6C108E&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&bhcp=1. More information about California private professional fiduciaries can be found here: https://californiaconservatorshipfacts.com/. Private professional fiduciaries often serve in cases as a neutral decision-maker when there are complex family dynamics, as in this case.  As counsel, my firm and I serve as the liaison between Ms. Montgomery in her role as Conservator, and the Court, ensuring absolute compliance with the legal requirements of the Conservatorship.

I can state unequivocally that Jodi Montgomery has been a tireless advocate for Britney and for her well-being.  While she does not control Britney’s financial assets, she is responsible for her personal care, and if Britney wants any issue brought up to the Court, Ms. Montgomery is and has always been ready, willing, and able to do so.From the very beginning of her appointment in September 2019, Ms. Montgomery and the medical team that she assembled have had one primary goal – to assist and encourage Britney in her path to no longer needing a conservatorship of the person.

 

As to Britney’s right to marry, that is unaffected by the conservatorship under Probate Code §1900.  As to family planning, that is also unaffected by the conservatorship.  If Britney needs any assistance with either, Ms. Montgomery has and will be there to provide any assistance needed to Britney.  Britney’s choice to marry and to start a family have never been impacted by the conservatorship while Ms. Montgomery has been conservator of the person.

Since being appointed in September 2019, Ms. Montgomery has tirelessly acted in Britney’s best interests with the approval of her doctors and the oversight of the Court.  All of Ms. Montgomery’s fees and costs are approved by the Court, as required by law, after petitions setting forth her fees and costs in detail are filed with the Court in the public record.  To protect Britney’s medical privacy, portions of the time records contained in those petitions do have to be sealed.

Because Ms. Montgomery does not have any power or authority over the conservatorship of the estate, every expenditure made by Ms. Montgomery for Britney has had to be first approved by Jamie Spears as the conservator of the estate.  Some expenses are pre-approved, but if new services or an increase in existing services is sought, Mr. Spears has to approve that expenditure. Practically speaking, since everythingcosts money, no expenditures can happen without going through Mr. Spears and Mr. Spears approving them. Ms. Montgomery has advocated on Britney’s behalf for any expenditures that Britney has requested as well as for expenditures recommended by Britney’s medical team.  Not every requested expenditure has been approved.  Jamie Spears, as conservator of the estate, has a duty to make decisions in the best interests of the estate, and sometimes that has meant requested expenditures have been denied or limited.   

Ms. Montgomery’s tenure as conservator of the person beginning in September 2019 has been complicated by the Covid-19 pandemic.  Britney lives in the Southern California area, who has suffered some of the highest Covid rates in the country.  California’s state of emergency due to the pandemic started on March 4, 2020, with many restrictions not being lifted in the Los Angeles area until just weeks ago.  Britney is someone who was at an increased risk of severe illness due to preexisting conditions.  A well-renowned epidemiologist was brought onto the medical team and that doctor’s advice was followed to ensure Britney’s safety from exposure to the virus at all times.

While it is Ms. Montgomery’s professional duty to be Britney’s protector and advocate, honoring her wishes and seeing to her best interests while Britney is under conservatorship, it is her sincere personal wish that Britney continues to make meaningful progress in her well-being so that her conservatorship of the person can be terminated.  Ms. Montgomery looks forward to presenting a comprehensive Care Plan to the Court setting forth a path for termination of the conservatorship for Britney, and Ms. Montgomery looks forward to supporting Britney through that process.”

Um ok it can be terminated. She’s fine. Stfu. I hate everyone in this saga. I don’t know who to trust and now it seems (which I’m enjoying) everyone is in a tizzy, throwing each other under the bus. Jamie is blaming Jodi, she’s blaming him. All the while Britney is in the middle, under constraints she should’ve never been under !!!! 

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block