Jump to content

Adam Streisand questions whether Ingham has been making false claims


Slayer

Recommended Posts

  • Super Mods

Another day another tweet from him questioning Ingham!

Quote

If Ingham was willing to represent falsely to the court that it declared #Britney incompetent to participate in her own medical decisions, has he been been making the same false claim all this time to her physicians?

Related content:
 

Britney-Spears-Former-Lawyer-Wonders-Why-Her-Current-Attorney-Took-12-Years-Be-Advocate-Her.thumb.jpg.e5d5f1dbb0aaed704925bd3c8ae6d30b.jpg

  • Love 7
  • Like 2

Link to comment

Britney had hired Adam Streisand, if the claims she was found incompetent aren’t true it meant she in fact was allowed to legally hire him, can he use that and say she is in fact his client and request access to speak with her? After all conservators are not allowed to deny access to her attorneys. Maybe he can file some claim about being thrown off her case unjustly since he was. 

  • Love 3
  • Like 6
Link to comment
41 minutes ago, AP4 said:

Britney had hired Adam Streisand, if the claims she was found incompetent aren’t true it meant she in fact was allowed to legally hire him, can he use that and say she is in fact his client and request access to speak with her? After all conservators are not allowed to deny access to her attorneys. Maybe he can file some claim about being thrown off her case unjustly since he was. 

Even if he wasn't able to use this loophole to help her, she could still hire him if that new law gets passed that was specifically written because of her. It allows people in c-ships to choose their own lawyers.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
45 minutes ago, kleinbritney said:

No he has to ask @Steel Magnolia first if he can even think about it.  ;-)

 

41 minutes ago, RedBloodedWoman said:

“It’s all about consent”:boredashell_pink_britney_hmm_blink_well_umm:

 


Considering the entire conservatorship exists to deny Britney the right to consent, I'm not sure why you two can't wrap your pea brains around it. :sipney_britney_starbucks_straw_sipping_drinking_spill:

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, BrittonJeanSpears said:

Even if he wasn't able to use this loophole to help her, she could still hire him if that new law gets passed that was specifically written because of her. It allows people in c-ships to choose their own lawyers.

Technically she was ALWAYS legally allowed to pick her own attorney. It wasn’t illegal before either. The new law will hopefully benefit others in the future, but she was lied to and so was her chosen attorney so what’s to stop the corrupt courts from lying to others in the future too. Seems like they make their own rules. 

  • Love 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment

Woah- Adam was super careful in his words in the past and in the documentary- he’s a lawyer, he knows that he can’t defame someone so public, especially not another lawyer. Especially something so touchy. 
 

Which makes me think that if he’s saying this - does he have more info? 

  • Love 4
  • Like 3
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block