Jump to content

Shell companies - draining the estate


ColdAsFire89

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
33 minutes ago, ColdAsFire89 said:

Oh Louise.. you manipulated the whole family I see. 
 

how everybody is benefiting of Britney being in the conservatorship

 

https://instagram.com/thatsurprisewitness?igshid=1fqhyn8vrpjcu


 

i hope you all rott in jail.

 

 

 

 

What about the argument that maybe the money is being put into trusts and LLCs and stuff so it cannot be considered hers if she were to be sued. A lot of wealthy people have money set up like this, to protect their assets from liability?

Thoughts on this???

 

Posted
1 minute ago, zxcvb said:

What about the argument that maybe the money is being put into trusts and LLCs and stuff so it cannot be considered hers if she were to be sued. A lot of wealthy people have money set up like this, to protect their assets from liability?

Thoughts on this???

 

It isn't hers anymore. Her name isn't anywhere on the founding documents for most of those companies. They've taken it from her possession and have reclassified it as their own assets. That's theft.

Posted
1 hour ago, alluvion said:

It isn't hers anymore. Her name isn't anywhere on the founding documents for most of those companies. They've taken it from her possession and have reclassified it as their own assets. That's theft.

Exactly.. she can’t claim that money anymore, her name is nowhere to be seen. So they’re not just making their money on salary as they claim, they’re pocketing her money in new companies that are not under legal observations. Meaning Jamie’s quote on reporting every dime is a lie...

Posted
24 minutes ago, ColdAsFire89 said:

Exactly.. she can’t claim that money anymore, her name is nowhere to be seen. So they’re not just making their money on salary as they claim, they’re pocketing her money in new companies that are not under legal observations. Meaning Jamie’s quote on reporting every dime is a lie...

Yes but then again Jamie, as conservator of Britney’s estate, by law doesn’t have to report on these new post-Cship companies. So technically he’s right. (He reports every dime he’s required to. Not the other $$ he’s banking that the law doesn’t require him to account for.)

But!!... most people don’t know/don’t consider this. Jamie, Lou & all the others involved are counting on the public’s ignorance of facts as well as their naïveté. Nobody wants to believe that her own father would steal from her & allow others, they believe the court wouldn’t allow such corruption. 

Everyone who’s against Free Britney always say if anything sketchy was happening the court would know. Bullsh... the court knows its loopholes in the system. The laws need to change to include all monies & all companies before & during the Cship be held to the same review standards. Until then Jamie, Lou and the rest will continue to steal and embezzle Britney’s money and hold her hostage while denying her of her children & human rights.

We must never forget these words from 2008 regarding the CONservatorship: the theft is on a grand scale, involving racketeering, wire fraud and money laundering, and that the theft occurred prior to the conservatorship taking place and continues still.

Posted
14 hours ago, alluvion said:

It isn't hers anymore. Her name isn't anywhere on the founding documents for most of those companies. They've taken it from her possession and have reclassified it as their own assets. That's theft.

13 hours ago, ColdAsFire89 said:

Exactly.. she can’t claim that money anymore, her name is nowhere to be seen. So they’re not just making their money on salary as they claim, they’re pocketing her money in new companies that are not under legal observations. Meaning Jamie’s quote on reporting every dime is a lie...

12 hours ago, generation glory said:

Yes but then again Jamie, as conservator of Britney’s estate, by law doesn’t have to report on these new post-Cship companies. So technically he’s right. (He reports every dime he’s required to. Not the other $$ he’s banking that the law doesn’t require him to account for.)

But!!... most people don’t know/don’t consider this. Jamie, Lou & all the others involved are counting on the public’s ignorance of facts as well as their naïveté. Nobody wants to believe that her own father would steal from her & allow others, they believe the court wouldn’t allow such corruption. 

Everyone who’s against Free Britney always say if anything sketchy was happening the court would know. Bullsh... the court knows its loopholes in the system. The laws need to change to include all monies & all companies before & during the Cship be held to the same review standards. Until then Jamie, Lou and the rest will continue to steal and embezzle Britney’s money and hold her hostage while denying her of her children & human rights.

We must never forget these words from 2008 regarding the CONservatorship: the theft is on a grand scale, involving racketeering, wire fraud and money laundering, and that the theft occurred prior to the conservatorship taking place and continues still.

It certainly matches up with Meaner03's timeline of Lou Taylor's involvement in 2008:

EenpNG6WoAAKs6B?format=png&name=900x900

https://twitter.com/MeanerThree/status/1290819267101896707/photo/1

 

 

 

Posted

what don't fans understand that nothing about this is unusual. 

A company had to be created everytime a new tour or certain event was made, afaik jive/RCA only covered album stuff, everything else including tours and Vegas would have been arranged by her team probably with loans or collateral 

Whether money under that premise was embezzled - unlikely but possible - trying to prove expenses years down the line is difficult. 

Posted
1 hour ago, chizwhiz said:

what don't fans understand that nothing about this is unusual. 

A company had to be created everytime a new tour or certain event was made, afaik jive/RCA only covered album stuff, everything else including tours and Vegas would have been arranged by her team probably with loans or collateral 

Whether money under that premise was embezzled - unlikely but possible - trying to prove expenses years down the line is difficult. 

She already had companies set up for these purposes. They created new ones, without her name attached to them in any way. Moved the money from her companies into their newly formed companies and shut down her companies. That's absolutely not "business as usual".

Posted

I don't understand why we as a fandom can not organize all these receipts and send them to every single news outlet in existence until someone drops a bombshell. Like why don't we send this to Ronan Farrow???

Posted
On 8/5/2020 at 6:45 PM, alluvion said:

She already had companies set up for these purposes. They created new ones, without her name attached to them in any way. Moved the money from her companies into their newly formed companies and shut down her companies. That's absolutely not "business as usual".

Her name can’t be attached to them because she’s legally got no rights and is a ward of court. The very argument this bunch have been granted the equity cship is to manage her finances and it would be pointless if she was being named competent in financial trusts

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...