Can we all agree this is Britney’s worst album cover and design?

[Urbanney]

Why? Just why? That FF photoshoot haunted us for years. They could’ve used other photoshoots or no photoshoot at all to make it more consistent with the design of B in the Mix (Volume 1). They could have just kept just the butterfly (like volume 1) and changed the color scheme a bit. They made such a tacky back cover design too, when they could’ve just, again, changed the color scheme and text from volume 1 and it’d look way better:

 

The FF era was a good era for commercial success, but her team still made a lot of poor choices  Especially when you had a ton of really talented Britney fans here on Exhale and Tumblr that were releasing their own artwork everyday that they could’ve hired probably for cheaper.

Edited June 22, 2020 by Roxxy
Featured. TEEHEE 💛🧡💜

[Roxxy]

It really is the worst. But I can't hate it cause it was a gift to me by my ex. So Marc, if you're watching, i'd like to say thank you, next.

[LetsRoll]

I actually really liked FF photoshoot (it's the only one from Randee that doesn't totally suck)

Also I nominate this for the second worst  LaChapelle version is 100 000 000 000 000 times better 

[Urbanney]

17 minutes ago, LetsRoll said:

I actually really liked FF photoshoot (it's the only one from Randee that doesn't totally suck)

Also I nominate this for the second worst  LaChapelle version is 100 000 000 000 000 times better 

I didn’t mind the FF photoshoot, but when it started to be used for almost every promotional item for like 2 years straight, it made me really sick of it. Also, unpopular opinion, I know, but I actually like the “screenshot” Glory cover, although the new cover is much better. 
 

It seems like Britney’s album covers are one thing where there isn’t a lot of consensus among the fanbase. People like a lot of different covers for different reasons

[sibode]

6 hours ago, LetsRoll said:

I actually really liked FF photoshoot (it's the only one from Randee that doesn't totally suck)

Also I nominate this for the second worst  LaChapelle version is 100 000 000 000 000 times better 

OMG I won't ever forgive them for this after the LaChapelle's cover art

[FeedTheStans]

The back cover is just so cheap looking. 

[YannFrance]

Do you really consider this to be a Britney album though? I mean no one knows about it expect for the fans. 

[Midnight]

I think that was the intention since it is a remixes album. It's kinda like more of a side project thing and not really a part of the main discography so they have to make it look less attractive to not confuse the buyer  

[Spiritbox]

It looks like a high schooler made it. The text looks like some free font stretched vertically, and the butterfly looks like it was some free transparent PNG off Google Images, stretched horizontally.

[pieceofbritUK]

10 hours ago, Urbanney said:

Why? Just why? That FF photoshoot haunted us for years. They could’ve used other photoshoots or no photoshoot at all to make it more consistent with the design of B in the Mix (Volume 1). They could have just kept just the butterfly (like volume 1) and changed the color scheme a bit. They made such a tacky back cover design too, when they could’ve just, again, changed the color scheme and text from volume 1 and it’d look way better:

 

The FF era was a good era for commercial success, but her team still made a lot of poor choices  Especially when you had a ton of really talented Britney fans here on Exhale and Tumblr that were releasing their own artwork everyday that they could’ve hired probably for cheaper. 

This never happened  

[PokemonSpears]

[CHAOTIC STYLE.]

No. Her worst album cover is Glory and probably Britney Jean. 
I don’t care about this one. No one know about it. 

 

[Towelney]

10 hours ago, Urbanney said:

I didn’t mind the FF photoshoot, but when it started to be used for almost every promotional item for like 2 years straight, it made me really sick of it. Also, unpopular opinion, I know, but I actually like the “screenshot” Glory cover, although the new cover is much better. 
 

It seems like Britney’s album covers are one thing where there isn’t a lot of consensus among the fanbase. People like a lot of different covers for different reasons

I thought I was the only one who liked the Glory cover  (Def prefer the new one, though)

“Not Alone, Not Alone, Not Alone”

[Spicechinodiva]

Well when you are not in control of your entire work, this is what happens.

 

[TheySayImCrazy18]

4 hours ago, YannFrance said:

Do you really consider this to be a Britney album though? I mean no one knows about it expect for the fans. 

No One Knows About Glory Except The Fans But It’s Still Considered To Be A Britney Album. 

[glorified.ho]

6 minutes ago, Spicechinodiva said:

Well when you are not in control of your entire work, this is what happens.

 

Not necessarily true!

Mariah is super involved in her career, writes and produces her own songs, remembers all her song's lyrics by heart, but that didn't avoid the fiasco below to happen, LOL:

[Simday1]

Like what was the Art Direction? FF didn't really give me that vibe. It was just CGI Pretty Pics (In A Pretty World), all over the place....typical RANDEE!

[MinakoS]

14 minutes ago, Spicechinodiva said:

Well when you are not in control of your entire work, this is what happens.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if Britney had approved the Glory cover tho 

[OnlyFacts]

They love to use pictures from randee, don’t they? Her team is a one trick pony.

Every photo shoot after circus went like this:

[Isla]

The back cover looks cheap af but the front cover isn’t that bad. Still better than the Glory cover.