Slant magazine and it's co owner Sal Brado has earned the wrath of the little monsters...again

[Spicechinodiva]

Little monsters are demanding metacritic to remove Slant's reviews of lady gaga away from her discography.

 

There is a reason why.

 

The music editor/ Co founder/ Co editor Sal Brado who goes By Sal Calminquri is a massive Madonna fan. Google his name. She's the first person in images. And it states in his bio he's been a massive fan since her inception in the industry back in 1982.

 

Case in point. He's reviewed both Madonna and Gaga albums 

 

His scores for the last 3 gaga albums were

 

40/100 Cheek to Cheek

50/100 joanne

50/100 For ASIB soundtrack 

And now a 50/100 for Chromatica.

 

Now onto Madonna reviews of her last outings 

 

MDNA 70/100

REBEL HEART 70/100

MADAME X 80/100.

THEY ARE really pissed as they feel this album should be in the 90s range as she's talking about mental health and things that matter. They even try talking to a few other reviewers to change their scores..

 

But the Sal ones is the ones that bother them the most.

 

Even with Chromatica he described it as music done lazily by a computer instead of real instruments.

 

My question is. Do they really have a point of view?

Even in gaga daily. They are all saying that they really need to let this go. As he's too higher rank. Being a co founder and a co editor. That there is no way metacritic would take his credentials away as he meets their standards..

 

@JordanMiller

@Roxxy

[NormaJeanSpears]

he has clear blatant bias, but...i kind of agree with him despite his bias. i think chromatica is not good. i would've given it like a 40/100 if i'm dead honest, and i'm not at ALL a gaga hater...i love at least two dozen lady gaga songs. but i think chromatica is a major let down. i'm baffled that it is receiving so much praise when she's capable of so much better...