Jump to content

Taylor Swift forms a band with Jack Antonoff and her Brother Austin Swift to start re-recording her catalog (and screw over Scooter Braun)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

A rock version of reputation. 

With all said and done, Taylor Swift is does NOT appear to be a good person. From what Ive read, Scooter Braun has offered numerous attempts at meeting and coming to agreements together regarding

Damnnnn she's brave and hella smart.

Posted Images

I really hope she records the songs a bit lower. She sang them lower during the Reputation era and they sounded so much better.

Link to post
3 hours ago, DonoDotto said:

With all said and done, Taylor Swift is does NOT appear to be a good person.

From what Ive read, Scooter Braun has offered numerous attempts at meeting and coming to agreements together regarding her music, but she has turned every time to taking her feud online and making drama.

Typical girl who cried wolf. 

You haven't done enough reading so.

 

Taylor was originally offered a contract that allowed her to own one old record for one new record; continuing the cycle. She was then told she couldnt perform her music  as it could be classed as a recording  which she cannot do until 2021 unless she agreed to not rerecord her music at all in future, or talk bad about the situation. He waited until the AMA's honouring Taylor as artist of the decade to tell her that.

The options given to Taylor were shut up or you wouldn't be able to perform your music, or say nothing and allow a man who actively tried to sabotage Taylor to gain off her albums.

And dont you dare say "typical girl who cried wolf". There's nothing typical about this situation.

  • Love 1
Link to post
10 hours ago, kenzieboi said:

She can't ask scooter to remove the other reputation album, that's not how it works. 

Also, who's her publisher? If it was big machine, he'll make money off this as well (but a much smaller portion)

she owns the publishing, so yes, she can have the original albums removed from all streaming when she decides to do so. 

Link to post
11 hours ago, IForgotYouExisted said:

I love Taylor to death but I am not down for total re-worked songs that sounds nothing like the original. Jojo did a good job rerecording her old material and I pray Taylor will keep the style.

Reputation is as good as it is, I don't need a rock version of any song.

But good 4 her how she gets back at Scooter!

when she re-records her albums later this year they will sounds as similar to the original as possible. The only reason reputation is being redone like this right now is because legally she can't re-record reputation for a few more years, her original contract only allows her to re-record her albums up to 1989 this year which she has already said she will do. This is just a Eff you to scooter to mess with him with reputation.

  • Like 1
Link to post
4 hours ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said:

You haven't done enough reading so.

 

Taylor was originally offered a contract that allowed her to own one old record for one new record; continuing the cycle. She was then told she couldnt perform her music  as it could be classed as a recording  which she cannot do until 2021 unless she agreed to not rerecord her music at all in future, or talk bad about the situation. He waited until the AMA's honouring Taylor as artist of the decade to tell her that.

The options given to Taylor were shut up or you wouldn't be able to perform your music, or say nothing and allow a man who actively tried to sabotage Taylor to gain off her albums.

And dont you dare say "typical girl who cried wolf". There's nothing typical about this situation.

Everything is typical about this situation.

Record companies are bought out ALL THE TIME.

The only reason this is even a story is because Taylor Swift personally doesnt like the person who bought out her record company. Tough for her. She was offered to buy it out herself beforehand, and her father himself is a shareholder at the company, so none of what happened was a "surprise" as the girl who cried wolf likes to claim.

The whole "youre not allowed to perform your songs on tv" was a lie from the get go, her record company has clarified this, further demonstrating shes an opportunistic snake who has no shame.

But be my guest- you guys go on letting Taylor, one of the most transparent bullies in the industry, keep on fooling you.

  • Like 1
Link to post
1 hour ago, itsAvry said:

when she re-records her albums later this year they will sounds as similar to the original as possible. The only reason reputation is being redone like this right now is because legally she can't re-record reputation for a few more years, her original contract only allows her to re-record her albums up to 1989 this year which she has already said she will do. This is just a Eff you to scooter to mess with him with reputation.

thx 4 the clarification!

Link to post
On 5/26/2020 at 4:43 AM, DonoDotto said:

Everything is typical about this situation.

Record companies are bought out ALL THE TIME.

The only reason this is even a story is because Taylor Swift personally doesnt like the person who bought out her record company. Tough for her. She was offered to buy it out herself beforehand, and her father himself is a shareholder at the company, so none of what happened was a "surprise" as the girl who cried wolf likes to claim.

The whole "youre not allowed to perform your songs on tv" was a lie from the get go, her record company has clarified this, further demonstrating shes an opportunistic snake who has no shame.

But be my guest- you guys go on letting Taylor, one of the most transparent bullies in the industry, keep on fooling you.

Where did they clarify it? Scooter never directly addressed it. 

Yikes at the ****** in your post, keep trying sweetie.

 

  • Love 1
Link to post
  • Exhale+
17 minutes ago, xzede25 said:

so she is making a cover of her own song.

Cool but Scooter still have the OG version, right? He still will make money of it...

But Taylor wrote the song. Satan is nor making bank off a cover. Taylor and Jack Antonoff are. Please go to songwriting  101 at the end of the hallway for the lessons in how Songwriters make money off of covers. Not ********* satanic monsters like Scooter 

I'm the hunter, you're the fox 🦊.

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :badthoughts_gun_kris_genner_thinking_debating:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block