social Britney was not interested in faking on this day

[everybodygoesdown]

11 hours ago, DownAndUp said:

I think I’m the only fan who likes Sam and thinks they both genuinely like each other 

I like him as well. There's no reason to hate on him, other than superficial prejudice because he looks good and is an aspiring actor.

[Martini]

She's already been through nobodies using her to further their own career, this is probably so exhausting and annoying to her.

[joanhs]

19 hours ago, Bundy said:

I dont hate him and sometimes it seems like hes into her (and hes not an actor to fake so well)

He comes across very narcissistic, vain, that loves attention and her team and dad are shady af, but I dont think its impossible to love Britney. Ofc a lot of people are after fame and money, but I feel like some people act as if Britney doesnt have anything to offer other than being a really famous rich and successful popstar. As if no one would love her for her. Ive seen a lot of fans that think her only real relationship was Kevin (probably bc she had kids with him, otherwise they would say was a PR thing as well) who only wanted her money. Many even think Justin only dated her for fame and It was all PR. Yes, her situation is unique, shes under a cship, but Charlie dated her even tho hes rich, successful, have famous parents and never tried to be famous. That Lindsay Lohan ex also dated her. Shes Britney Spears, ofc that will call everyones attention, but that doesnt mean someone cant fall in love with her. People act like shes a dumb crazy boring old ugly lady. I think shes Attractive, seems fun and kind. Its quite sad many people think shes never been loved and probably never will. That people would only date her if they are being paid by her team.

And it's okay to date a narcicistic ego person He can still have good sides and as long he takes care of her, what else is there left. 

[chizwhiz]

5 hours ago, rik said:

why would she not be able to care for them emotionally? she is obsessed with her children even now

she can financially cater towards them, provide them with love and shelter, as well as tutors for education 

guys, we found Jamie 

Do you know her then?  clearly there is a reason because a judge has decided she is not only not fit to have her children solely under her custody but also now not able to see them as much as she used to.

the whole point of the c ship is this argument that she cannot cope 

 

[C0CKy]

16 hours ago, chizwhiz said:

Not if it involves risking her money or having children she might not be emotionally possible if caring for

What?

So because she has money she shouldn’t get to make her own decisions that you and I can make. 

Great logic. 

[Sealed_With_A_Chris]

22 hours ago, Cappycorn87 said:

She s under a damn conservatorship where she does not have a lot of rights and say in much.  You folks are really believing that folks just walk into Britney life while under a restrictive and isolating conservatorship.   No guy is going to walk into chaos like that unless they are getting something out of the deal which I said and stand by none of these guys being real boyfriends.  I'm surprised you folks have not figured that out about Sam who was in the picture while Britney was forced against her will into a facility earlier this year.  Nobody said she can't find love, it impossible to do that under a restrictive and isolating conservatorship that shady want that kind of control over Britney and her money mainly.

I think Britney is in an awfully hard place even without the conservatorship. I have a friend that I am close to whose family has a ton of money, and people are always trying to hang out with her and use her. My friend has sort of come to know when someone is there for her or there for what she has to offer. 

 

I am sure Britney has the same issues. She is an adult capable of knowing if that person is using her or not. I think the conservatorship keeps her from getting married on purpose tho, because they dont trust her from her young adult mistakes (which are just that, young adult mistakes)....poor thing is like permanently grounded, for something that happened forever ago. 

[Puppy]

2 hours ago, Sealed_With_A_Chris said:

I think Britney is in an awfully hard place even without the conservatorship. I have a friend that I am close to whose family has a ton of money, and people are always trying to hang out with her and use her. My friend has sort of come to know when someone is there for her or there for what she has to offer. 

 

I am sure Britney has the same issues. She is an adult capable of knowing if that person is using her or not. I think the conservatorship keeps her from getting married on purpose tho, because they dont trust her from her young adult mistakes (which are just that, young adult mistakes)....poor thing is like permanently grounded, for something that happened forever ago. 

I think it’s the fact she made it known in the past she was gonna quit, I remember she repeated so many times interviews she wanted to get married and raise a family, I’m sure that scared a lot of her team as her career is still hot yet she was willing to throw it all away. 

[jennyj]

This wasn't about 'faking it'. In her Insta story she was excited in the car ride to the event.

She got pissed when one of the photographers wanted to take solo pictures of her, and got even more pissed when another asked about the C-Ship. If the event was herself, then she would have posed herself, but this event has nothing to do with her, she was there as a +1 to support her BF. So she got pissed when they tried to make it about her. She's a humble queen like that.

 

On 11/19/2019 at 5:30 PM, Dirk said:

 

I wonder why she suddenly wanted to go back? I thought someone was asking her questions but it doesn't look like it. 

One of the photogs kept asking him to move and so they can get pics of her pose by herself, you can see her kindly saying 'No' a few times. But they wouldn't stop, so she didn't like that. The event had nothing to do with her. She was simply there to support her BF. Plus, this was at the time when all that C-Ship drama was happening, so obviously it was very overwhelming.

[chizwhiz]

8 hours ago, C0CKy said:

What?

So because she has money she shouldn’t get to make her own decisions that you and I can make. 

Great logic. 

I said she wasn't to be reponsbile for money, she was buying a new house every other week or a new car, as Andrew Wallett said her outgoings were bleeding her dry even after all the royalties.

[RedBloodedWoman]

4 hours ago, chizwhiz said:

I said she wasn't to be reponsbile for money, she was buying a new house every other week or a new car, as Andrew Wallett said her outgoings were bleeding her dry even after all the royalties.

.... she’s moved twice since the c-ship started....... once before

[chizwhiz]

1 hour ago, RedBloodedWoman said:

.... she’s moved twice since the c-ship started....... once before

She had multiple homes google it. When it started she was living in the summit (a celebrity estate) which they sold under value after years of being on the market, then they moved her the a house almost as a diversion for paps once this one in Thousand Oaks was renovated 

[Cappycorn87]

8 hours ago, chizwhiz said:

I said she wasn't to be reponsbile for money, she was buying a new house every other week or a new car, as Andrew Wallett said her outgoings were bleeding her dry even after all the royalties.

Britney has never had money problems.  She was bringing in 700,000 dollars a month around that time.  I would be careful believing anything coming from folks who benefit financially from Britney being in a conservatorship. 

[C0CKy]

55 minutes ago, Cappycorn87 said:

I would be careful believing anything coming from folks who benefit financially from Britney being in a conservatorship. 

This

[chizwhiz]

1 hour ago, Cappycorn87 said:

Britney has never had money problems.  She was bringing in 700,000 dollars a month around that time.  I would be careful believing anything coming from folks who benefit financially from Britney being in a conservatorship. 

 

8 minutes ago, C0CKy said:

This

The financial documents (available online from 2008) which have had 11 years to be cross checked by anyone, show that her outgoings were exceeding her income. 

She was spending more than she earned for a long time.

right so you’re calling a lawyer who is still practicing on the bar a liar as he supported this case? I think not.

A major clue to this was that she was buying homes on mortgages in 2007 (again in the public docs) when she shouldn’t have needed to. There is no ‘explanation’ to that.