KillersWhoArePartying Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 wow look how bad Avril's picture is... you can barely even see her face (mic covering ) and the pose is just awkward Link to comment
KillersWhoArePartying Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 3 hours ago, DayvinDazone said: The people on Wikipedia with most power and influence are literally always those with like zero taste. Wikipedia badly needs more gays in charge because the photos of all the gay Queens are literally the pits and I see a clear agenda there. The blatant homophobia is concerning. #FreeBritney'sWikipediaPicture Mariah's pic is cute at least Link to comment
Isla Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Here's some more examples of singers holding mics and some aren't that great (Eminem deserves a better pic)... but what does Wikipedia know anyway? Link to comment
OneTrackMind Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Is that him? Perhaps we should harass him a little bit so he leaves Britney alone https://twitter.com/glennfrancis?lang=de Link to comment
feo Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 What a tool. 44 minutes ago, OneTrackMind said: Is that him? Perhaps we should harass him a little bit so he leaves Britney alone https://twitter.com/glennfrancis?lang=de If it is him he kind of deserves some nasty comments. He sounds like a tool and his 2013 pic is horrendous and blurry Link to comment
Shadow2003 Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 11 hours ago, OneTrackMind said: Is that him? Perhaps we should harass him a little bit so he leaves Britney alone https://twitter.com/glennfrancis?lang=de Harrasment sounds like a bad idea... I think we should first try and find a photo that fits all their requirements and then, if it gets reverted back to the 2013 pick, bring out the big guns. So far, the requirements we know about are: no microphone or anything else blocking the face a shot from the chest up 9 hours ago, DayvinDazone said: I wonder if the leaked Make Me video footage is copyrighted since it was scrapped and David LaChapelle wants nothing to do with it... We could potentially use a screengrab from the video if there's no copyright That pic is A•MA•ZING! We could definitely use that one. Link to comment
Psuedonym Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Guys, all of your efforts are going to be useless if you didn't take the picture yourself or have the permission of someone who did. I agree that the 2013 picture is dated, but it does look professional for an encyclopedia article. Perhaps find someone who attended the Domination announcement and see if you can get their permission to use the picture on Wikipedia with a creative commons license. Link to comment
Psuedonym Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 32 minutes ago, DayvinDazone said: I wonder if the leaked Make Me video footage is copyrighted since it was scrapped and David LaChapelle wants nothing to do with it... We could potentially use a screengrab from the video if there's no copyright Stuff like this can only be used if there's no free equivalent available or there never will be (i.e. if a celebrity passes away). Since the 2013 picture is suitable, uploading this would be considered a copyright violation and would be taken down. In Britney's case, screenshots are going to be off limits. Link to comment
CripplerCrossface Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 Guys, if you want to change the picture you need to update a picture made by yourself. Don't search in Google Images. And that photographer is working for himself that's a violation of Wikipedia's rules, i recently heard about a similar case. Link to comment
Super Mods SlayOut Posted June 18, 2019 Super Mods Share Posted June 18, 2019 Yeah, I believe U.S copyright law only allows images to be used on Wikipedia that have no copyright restrictions, or if permission from the photographer has been granted. Obviously, photographers that take high resolution photographs of Britney would only let the public have access to their image if it would make them a lot of money. If a fan is going to try changing her image, you can do a Google Image search for Britney, then go to Tools, Usage Rights, and then "Reuse" or "Reuse with modification". Whatever images show up there, would be free to use on Wikipedia... to my knowledge! You would still probably have to double check, though! Some options include: Spoiler Link to comment
alienatedNey Posted June 18, 2019 Author Share Posted June 18, 2019 On 6/17/2019 at 4:37 PM, HuffingAndPuffingOnStage said: i died when they claimed the other user defending you was a "sock puppet" account and blocked them indefinitely they're crazy i feel like i went into the dark web 23 hours ago, IUSAtonight said: I mean lbr, the mic covers a part of her current face that we wouldn't be too mad about people not seeing What pictures are allowed to use? I suppose pics from events require permision from the photographer, right? So is it only pics taken by fans? basically it's either pics you took yourself or pics with no copyrights (can be found on flickr ) but most of em are already uploaded, just like the Apple Music Festival pic. 21 hours ago, Shadow2003 said: Worry not, @alienatedNey, I already have an account on Wikipedia. have you ever tried changing her pic? I HAVE BEEN BLOCKED FOR A WEEK also, i think we need a closeup pic of her and i am100% sure that the one you posted will be reverted again. 20 hours ago, DayvinDazone said: The people on Wikipedia with most power and influence are literally always those with like zero taste. Wikipedia badly needs more gays in charge because the photos of all the gay Queens are literally the pits and I see a clear agenda there. The blatant homophobia is concerning. #FreeBritney'sWikipediaPicture It's really not fair because if you look at most other singers' wiki, they all have decent pic and i am pretty sure its because their die-hard fans get to handle the pages. 17 hours ago, Alexa said: I'm pretty sure you can use video screencaps, as evidenced by a few pages I've seen. Maybe something from the VMA red carpet. really?? we should give it a try then. i'm blocked for a week though. i cant believe this 16 hours ago, December02 said: I hate that old picture. It doesn't look like her now at all and didn't really look like her then. My avi should totally be the pic It's totally her team trying to sabotage her your avi is one of her best picture ever that makeup, lighting are flawfless. i wonder if we can use pictures taken from her instagram account? Link to comment
alienatedNey Posted June 18, 2019 Author Share Posted June 18, 2019 21 hours ago, iAlwaysSingLive said: yet these (^) and even better - this picture of Cher from the 70s - are completely fine: literally wtaf though as i said, i think there needs to be lots of people backing up the Apple Music Festival picture in the talk page so that it can be used. 14 hours ago, Isla said: Here's some more examples of singers holding mics and some aren't that great (Eminem deserves a better pic)... but what does Wikipedia know anyway? oh wow this can definitely be used as a backup on the talk section of her wiki page. unfortunately, only one user backed me up on the discussion there (and he was blocked as they claimed he was a sock puppet of me) I HAVE NO f**king WORDS 14 hours ago, OneTrackMind said: Is that him? Perhaps we should harass him a little bit so he leaves Britney alone https://twitter.com/glennfrancis?lang=de **** YES WE SHOULD! 12 hours ago, DayvinDazone said: I wonder if the leaked Make Me video footage is copyrighted since it was scrapped and David LaChapelle wants nothing to do with it... We could potentially use a screengrab from the video if there's no copyright its worth a try 12 hours ago, Shadow2003 said: Harrasment sounds like a bad idea... I think we should first try and find a photo that fits all their requirements and then, if it gets reverted back to the 2013 pick, bring out the big guns. So far, the requirements we know about are: no microphone or anything else blocking the face a shot from the chest up That pic is A•MA•ZING! We could definitely use that one. dont you think the "no microphone or whatever blocking her face" is stupid? when lots of singers' pic use pics like that as discussed in this thread?? Link to comment
Shadow2003 Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 19 minutes ago, alienatedNey said: have you ever tried changing her pic? No, I've never changed any pictures on Wikipedia, since I don't know how to do that. So far, I only do small corrections on music and aviation related pages. The most complex thing I've done so far is changing the format of genres listed for a song or album from: |genre = [[Genre 1]], [[genre 2]], [[genre 3]] to: |genre = {{hlist|[[Genre 1]]|[[genre 2]]|[[genre 3]]}} Link to comment
IUSAtonight Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 Just found a good pic where she's holding a mic but her full face is showing, it's super recent but she's looking fresh Spoiler Link to comment
DarkOut Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 I like both pictures for different reasons and think maybe there's a better 3rd option... ... BUT OH MY GOSH, Wikipedia users are SOOO RUDE (and presumptuous)!!! I already knew I wouldn't want to bother with them. Ugh, they make me mad. ETA: From what I know about Wikipedia, they're super salty about changes. They hate direct changes and prefer people to use the talk section to merely suggest changes. Direct changes are highly likely to get reverted. If you want a better picture used, I suggest proposing changes in the discussion area and AVOID making direct changes. I think that's how those particular nerds are there. Very cliquey, I think. The "cool" kid nerds get to have free-range and noobs get crushed. Link to comment
alienatedNey Posted June 19, 2019 Author Share Posted June 19, 2019 19 hours ago, IUSAtonight said: Just found a good pic where she's holding a mic but her full face is showing, it's super recent but she's looking fresh Hide contents they wont allow it because "the MIc iS CovERing HeR FacE" 18 hours ago, DarkOut said: I like both pictures for different reasons and think maybe there's a better 3rd option... ... BUT OH MY GOSH, Wikipedia users are SOOO RUDE (and presumptuous)!!! I already knew I wouldn't want to bother with them. Ugh, they make me mad. ETA: From what I know about Wikipedia, they're super salty about changes. They hate direct changes and prefer people to use the talk section to merely suggest changes. Direct changes are highly likely to get reverted. If you want a better picture used, I suggest proposing changes in the discussion area and AVOID making direct changes. I think that's how those particular nerds are there. Very cliquey, I think. The "cool" kid nerds get to have free-range and noobs get crushed. i agree idk how old are they but they all seem so........ rustic I'm mad because most celebs wiki main pics are new and we have to stuck to that old pic for 6 goddam years Link to comment
DexWillBeThere98 Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 The one in Wikipedia in Spanish is the one you added, thankfully Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.