Jump to content

#FREEBRITNEY | Britney’s Gram Received Worrying Voicemail Regarding Britney


Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Joey Orfino said:

Probably. You can be sure that if Lynne becomes Britney's new conservator, Jamie and his team will launch a compaign to tarnish her reputation.

The ironic thing is that Jamie and his team have already been tarnishing Britney's reputation with their choices for her career the last decade. I mean just look at the Femme Fatale Tour, judging X Factor, releasing Britney Jean, lip syncing to old album vocals during POM shows etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
22 minutes ago, MyQueenBritney said:

The ironic thing is that Jamie and his team have already been tarnishing Britney's reputation with their choices for her career the last decade. I mean just look at the Femme Fatale Tour, judging X Factor, releasing Britney Jean, lip syncing to old album vocals during POM shows etc.

I know. Ever since 2011, it was just a succession of bad moves in her career. Thankfully, as soon as she got more control in 2016, it got better. Proving that when she's more in control, she can have more passion and she can deliver unlike when they are in full control. Which proves how much the conservatorship is not needed anymore.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Dollyg said:

Ironically tmz is saying she has joint custody thanks to Jamie. Didn’t they just admit that it was cut to 10/90 cuz of him? 

Harvey Levin’s TMZ is telling a damn lie!!! They know that Britney does not & can not have any form of actual legal or physical child custody of her sons while under the Cship. Jamie isn’t the only one who can do the job of conservator. There are other people that a probate judge could select to replace Jamie. There are literally people in the system, usually lawyers, whose job is to be a conservator - much like Andrew Wallet who was conservator of Britney’s finances until recently. The judge can appoint a new conservator over Britney the person and if they also choose appoint a new conservator over her finances. (That would remove Lou-natic Taylor’s TriStar from overseeing all that money!!) It’s not just Jamie - LIES! Don’t believe that! :ririshade2: Harvey Levin’s a lawyer so surely her knows there is more than one definition of the word custody. TMZ has intentionally misled the public choosing to defer to custody as meaning “in the care of” as opposed to the LEGAL definition of custody/child custody. It’s also about the context in which “custody” is used 

Let me break it down once more. :mj:

Britney lost PHYSICAL custody of her children in Oct. 2007. Receipts below, please read link.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ocregister.com/2007/10/01/lawyer-reveals-why-britney-spears-lost-custody-of-her-kids/amp/

Three months after losing physical custody of her children, in Jan. 2008 Britney then lost LEGAL custody of her children. Receipts below, please read link.

A court commissioner Friday gave sole physical and legal custody of the former couple’s two little boys to Federline and suspended the troubled pop star’s visitation rights.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailynews.com/2008/01/04/britney-spears-trouble-mount-as-she-loses-custody-again/amp/

Britney has not had child custody of any kind since early Jan. 2008 — which happened BEFORE the two 5150s that occurred that same month. The second 5150 resulted in Jamie obtaining two conservatorships over Britney (cship of Britney the person + cship of her finances) that is still in effect today. The cship officially began on Feb. 1, 2008. Feb. 23 is when Britney through the cship was able to reestablish visitation with her sons. Receipts below, please read link.

“Britney Spears was reunited with her sons for three hours on Saturday. After lawyers for Spears and Kevin Federline reached a visitation agreement Friday, the pop star saw her children Preston, 2, and Jayden, 1, for the first time since Jan. 3.”

(link) https://www.google.com/amp/s/people.com/celebrity/britney-spears-visits-with-her-boys/amp/

Since then it’s always been SUPERVISED visits with her boys. For a while there was a court appointed child monitor which may have been placed there during and or shortly after Britney & Kevin’s divorce. But the stipulation post cship is that there always be someone there monitoring Britney while she monitors her sons -  while her sons are visiting her (however you want to phrase it) whether that be Jamie, a nanny, security guard, personal assistant or other adult. Since Britney’s caretaker Jamie (dad, conservator & child monitor) has been accused of child abuse of one of the conservatee’s (Britney’s) children, they can’t be around her or Jamie since legally Jamie = Britney. :decisions:

This is why her child visitation has been cut - because of what Jamie did to Preston. Kevin will choose who he feels comfortable having the kids around as child monitor when they resume visits with Britney but it can’t be Jamie. The probate court judge will have to decide either allow Jamie to stay on as conservator & monitor despite him being accused of child abuse and having a 3 year restraining order against him to protect his grandsons from his violent unpredictable outbursts OR remove him as conservator and replace him with either another Spears relative or an independent non-familial person (a lawyer/s) so they can be conservator and monitor Britney with her sons to endure everyone’s safety.

ETA - imo it’d be best for Britney, Preston & Jayden if the judge removes Jamie as conservator of Britney the person and her finances- meaning no Lou Taylor overseeing the accounting stuff!! The judge could remove all “Jamie era” team including Lou and select all NEW & INDEPENDENT 3rd party lawyers/representatives to oversee the cship. But most likely maybe a judge would prefer to have another relative succeed Jamie just for familiarity’s sake, i.e., Lynne Spears or Bryan Spears. (Not JL. Screw you, Jamie Lynn!!🙄)

Imo the judge needs have a re-evaluation of Britney post Jamie era (maybe it’s happening now?) to decide if a cship is still the proper arrangement necessary for Britney as her condition has improved since Feb 2008 but she still needs someone looking after her in a modified, different way. If there’s a better plan that doesn’t involve a cship then the judge should/could complete remove it. Or modify it so the cship of Britney the person ends (she regains her legal freedom so she can actually petition child court for joint legal custody then build up to joint physical custody of her 2 boys - yet keep cship over her finances or make another arrangement for her finances. Just bcuz you’re wealthy with mental illness doesn’t mean you need a cship or a cship of your estate. There are other ways to protect Britney’s financial estate WITHOUT a financial cship.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

let's be real. Jamie has a restaining order against Britney's kids for 3 years. There is no way he can still be her conservator because his duty was to be present when Britney is with her sons. It's INCOMPATIBLE.

I wonder if Britney has been able to see her children since that day! and who she is with now, she said she's on vacation by herself... weird. 

Will we get answers september 18?

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Have you seenthis? Now Jamie says he doesn't want to be her conservator anymore (at least until Jan 2020) because he's sick :nyheadache: There will be a new conservator (Jodi Montomery) and again... Britney wont attend the audience but she's ok with the change :mj:

https://www.tmz.com/2019/09/06/jamie-spears-britney-conservatorship-step-down/

Quote

Jamie Spears wants out as his daughter's conservator, at least through January 20, 2020.

According to new legal docs obtained by TMZ, Jamie is asking "to temporarily relinquish the powers of conservatorship ... due to personal health reasons."

Jamie wants a temporary conservator ... Jodi Montgomery, whom he describes as Britney's care manager over the last year ... who he says has the ability to take on the responsibilities.

As we reported, Jamie's team believed Kevin Federline and/or Lynne Spears might try and challenge his conservatorship, in the wake of the criminal investigation regarding Jamie's confrontation with Britney's 13-year-old son, Sean.

According to the docs, Jamie is asking the judge to give Montgomery the same powers he has, which includes --

1.  The power to restrict or limit visitors by any means.

2.  The power to retain caretakers and security for Britney on a 24-hour basis.

3.  The power to prosecute civil harassment restraining orders.

4.  The power to communicate with expert medical personnel regarding Britney and to have full access to her medical and psychiatric records.

Montgomery has already consented to act as the temporary conservator.

Jamie wants a hearing expedited to next Monday. He also indicated Britney is "able but unwilling" to attend the hearing. He also says she does not want to contest the proceeding and does not object to temporarily appointing Montgomery as conservator.

Jamie has battled intestinal issues for nearly a year and was in serious condition late last year. His colon had ruptured and he underwent multiple surgeries.

 

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, maquisl said:

Have you seenthis? Now Jamie says he doesn't want to be her conservator anymore (at least until Jan 2020) because he's sick :nyheadache: There will be a new conservator (Jodi Montomery) and again... Britney wont attend the audience but she's ok with the change :mj:

https://www.tmz.com/2019/09/06/jamie-spears-britney-conservatorship-step-down/

 

He knows the backlash would be even more real for him if he stays a conservator after that hearing on september 18 so what a convenient timing for him :tiffeyeroll:

His poor imaginery illness. What is it going to be now? Preston hit him too hard in the colon when he tried to defend himself against his abuse.

Of course he would put a care manager who only worked with Britney for a year instead of her mom and you file for it before the big hearing because he's scared that Lynne will replace him which will probably result on a bigger chance for Britney to get out of the conservatorship.

The last thing we need is another corrupted person hired by Jamie.

  • Like 4
Link to comment

09/06/2019 Proof of Service
Filed by Attorney

09/06/2019 Confidential Screening Form
Filed by Attorney

09/06/2019 Consent (Consent to Act as Temporary Conservator of the Person )
Filed by Attorney

09/06/2019 Declaration (Declaration re Urgency )
Filed by Attorney

09/06/2019 Notice - Hearing
Filed by Attorney

09/06/2019 Ex Parte - Application (Ex Parte Application for Good Cause Exception to Notice of Haring on Petition for Appointment of Temporary Conservator )
Filed by Attorney

09/06/2019 Ex Parte - Petition to Appoint Temporary Conservator
Filed by Attorney

  • Like 1
Link to comment
32 minutes ago, maquisl said:

Have you seenthis? Now Jamie says he doesn't want to be her conservator anymore (at least until Jan 2020) because he's sick :nyheadache: There will be a new conservator (Jodi Montomery) and again... Britney wont attend the audience but she's ok with the change :mj:

https://www.tmz.com/2019/09/06/jamie-spears-britney-conservatorship-step-down/

 

We only accept one free Britney.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

This is so disgusting!!!! Just passing control of Britney around to any random?! IN WHAT f**king UNIVERSE IS THAT OK?! This all makes me so mad, he absolutely should have no say and he should be in jail for abusing Preston. Absolute scumbag, still can’t let go of that control so is trying to recommend someone no doubt who will be on his side, this man is a monster. Go rot in jail Jamie. Brenda better f**king deny that **** :badthoughts:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block