news #FREEBRITNEY | Britney’s Gram Received Worrying Voicemail Regarding Britney

[ILikeChillinWithYou]

On the bright side of all this controversy, Britney's Instagram followers increase by 200k and she is a trending search term on Google too 

[summer2summer]

45 minutes ago, ILikeChillinWithYou said:

On the bright side of all this controversy, Britney's Instagram followers increase by 200k and she is a trending search term on Google too 

Her team must be itching to call myah marie to record some unfinished demos so they can it an album and cash in . 

[MarcMarc2231]

I'm thinking about Jamie's want to resign the cship in other states. Why not in Nevada? Britney love Las Vegas, why he don't put there the cship? 

And about this (sorry I'm italian and here we don't have this type of things)when she's doing shows in vegas she's not under the control of Jamie? I'm correct? 

[Catalin]

29 minutes ago, Cwazy said:

i can't believe some people are still on "maybe she needs the conservatorship to do the things people who actually need conservatorships aren't able to do" ...i'm sleep

I love how they keep ignoring this:

 

“Conservatee’s business activities have greatly accelerated due to her increased well being and her capacity to be more engaged in furthering her career activities.”

"This conservatorship shoul be viewed more as a hybrid business model."

It's literally in their face.

[sweeetyme]

So do we know for sure that Lynne is on Britney's side and working against Jamie? Are they separated again? I thought they are together for a few years now.. what if lynnes not really on Britney's side?

[Catalin]

4 minutes ago, DayvinDazone said:

I wish she was her own manager. I think Britney is the type of artist that needs 100% control over her career. She can have someone to help her out, but not someone as controlling and manipulative as the red nose liar.

 

She is a worldwide HOT! topic

 

Ireland better stan!!!

1. Ireland

2. Norway

3. United Kingdom

5. Sweden

And they said she's irrelevant in Europe.

[Dream Within a Dream]

4 minutes ago, Catalin said:

1. Ireland

2. Norway

3. United Kingdom

5. Sweden

And they said she's irrelevant in Europe.

No one said that lmao

[tsss]

45 minutes ago, Cwazy said:

i can't believe some people are still on "maybe she needs the conservatorship to do the things people who actually need conservatorships aren't able to do" ...i'm sleep

the same people criticize her lackluster dancing skills and obvious desire to gtfo of stage

as if she would perform if she wasn't forced to do so

it's normal to have her rights removed but god forbid her being dead inside on stage I wonder why she is that way! 

[fnfurter]

25 minutes ago, Catalin said:

I love how they keep ignoring this:

 

“Conservatee’s business activities have greatly accelerated due to her increased well being and her capacity to be more engaged in furthering her career activities.”

"This conservatorship shoul be viewed more as a hybrid business model."

It's literally in their face.

We literally have an active member from NASGA here who keeps insisting how irregular it is. All sorts of people who have worked on these things are saying it.

They're selectively ignoring all of this. It's mind blowing to watch, tbh.

[Cigarettes&Cologne]

all this talk about the 'conservatee's estate' is how they talk about MJ and he's dead. let the woman control her own life you sick f**ks. this situation actually makes me mad

[tco]

We can pull this one, we need to trend more, & more we did it once we can make it again, and do more petitions, I really do think Britney is aware we care about her, also if they force her to entertain with the C-ship we shouldnt be supporting this until she is out of this C-**** it is the only way they do not get more money, I hope for the best for our Brit.

[summer2summer]

37 minutes ago, Cigarettes&Cologne said:

all this talk about the 'conservatee's estate' is how they talk about MJ and he's dead. let the woman control her own life you sick f**ks. this situation actually makes me mad

That's exactly what i initially thought . This entire court scheme is reporting Britney as a third "it" party . Like she's no longer human or even here with us. It's frustrating , it's blood boiling. 

And the fact that this whole "Britney may never perform" deal is literally how her team is trying to shut us thr **** up by dangling a carrot to some hungry pigs whom only want to feed. The carrot that is her "performing" . "She cant perform , she's not right in the head unless we stay in control of her and her career". 

She's past an object , a product , a piece of meat and a pet to them. She's LITERALLY a money machine to them , they'd probably prefer her dead than not under their control making them those millions. We have witnessed her legacy being destroyed infront of our eyes , all was intentional. Just put her out there , against her will or not , she's got kids and we can hold that against her . Want your kids? Keep performing you monkey. 

 

[summer2summer]

47 minutes ago, tco said:

We can pull this one, we need to trend more, & more we did it once we can make it again, and do more petitions, I really do think Britney is aware we care about her, also if they force her to entertain with the C-ship we shouldnt be supporting this until she is out of this C-**** it is the only way they do not get more money, I hope for the best for our Brit.

What has happened with the petition? 

[NBT]

[zxcvb]

Nice article from 2011 pointing some of the things in this thread, in light of her Femme Fatale era:

"...This is all the doing of Jamie Spears, her (allegedly) emotionally abusive recovered-addict father, who finally succeeded in his wrestle for Brit-Brit Control in February 2008. That was the year Britney’s public trainwreck (detailed poignantly in this Rolling Stone article) bottomed out and, while Britney was in the hospital, Jamie’s lawyers arranged the conservatorship that granted him exclusive rights to Britney’s personal life and financials. It was supposed to be temporary, just ’til she got back on her feet.

But when Britney got healthy, Jamie’s lawyers actually pushed for greater authority and, on October 28th of 2008, Jamie secured a permanent conservatorship. PERMANENT! So HE OWNS HER FOREVER! 

Jenny Eliscu, who wrote Britney’s 2008 Rolling Stone cover story, said it’s “very rare for a young adult who is not extremely ill to have their rights assigned to a conservator.” Furthermore:

“[The conservatorship]’s designed, ideally, to protect people who are seriously ill. We’re talking about people who are non compos mentis, according to the lawyers I consulted. Or they’re in a vegetative state. Or they’re just so old that they can’t take care of themselves anymore. But Britney? It was making less and less sense as time went on.”

Even Wikipedia states clearly that “Conservatorships are generally put in place for severely mentally ill individuals or seniors with dementia or Alzheimer’s.”

So what’s the deal? The Judge presiding over Britney’s case in 2010, when the conservatorship was once again renewed, told the press that Britney remained “susceptible to undue influence.” Eliscu theorizes that “political pressure on the courts to keep Britney off the streets” could be a factor. Meanwhile Britney has been “deemed unfit” to hire her own attorney (according to the Times UK), though she initially tried to.  The lawyers Jamie hired — including Britney’s —  “appear to have such a strong financial interest in maintaining the arrangement.”

According to The Times UK, friends of the Spears family “doubt [Jamie] is the right person to be taking care of his psychologically fragile daughter.”

In the meantime, Team Britney RAKING IT IN! By December 2009, Jamie had reportedly increased the value of Britney’s controlled assetstenfold, from $2,826,362 to $27,500,000. Jamie brought in more from her estate than he’s ever made in his life, and certainly more than he did from the construction business he started, which went bankrupt. The conservatorship is now going on three years as it was extended again in 2010. Is this really about protecting Britney for her own sake, or is it about turning her into a money-making machine?...

https://www.autostraddle.com/its-not-britney-*****-84052/

And there is Caryn Ganz's very relevant comments from 2008...

 

 

 

[summer2summer]

https://www.change.org/p/team-britney-freebritney

 

Sign if you haven't . Share the link . And let's contact the op to update the page with the latest. 

[armrunner1998]

50 minutes ago, sweeetyme said:

So do we know for sure that Lynne is on Britney's side and working against Jamie? Are they separated again? I thought they are together for a few years now.. what if lynnes not really on Britney's side?

Lynne and Jamie never remarried, I don't think. Lynne is on Britney's side though, it was reported that they were sitting on the opposite end of the courtroom from Jamie and Britney's team.

[Stifler's Mom]

THE MEDIA IS FINALLY SPEAKING UP THE TRUTH!!!! SPREAD IT

" under the legal control of others. " so shady

[falka]

5 minutes ago, Damon said:

Colors got me flying 

[zxcvb]

And when the conservatorship was renewed, critically, in 2010 there was this article:

"Does anyone know why Britney Spears is still under conservatorship? I mean, besides Britney, her judge, and her dad?

Anyone?

Last Thursday, MTV.com reported that Britney and her father met with Judge Reva Goetz – at the request of the judge – to discuss the conservatorship Britney has been under since early 2008.

For those of you who aren’t all up to par on your legalese, being under conservatorship means someone else has control of all your stuff – stuff being your money, assets, etc. – and when “you” are an actual “you” and not an organization or some other entity, the reason for conservatorship usually circles around mental or physical inabilities to make legal, financial, and medical decisions on your own.

Given Britney’s past (the one filled with substance abuse and involuntary hospitalization; not the Mouseketeer one), no one was really shocked when she was placed under conservatorship; however, it’s been nearly three years. In Britney’s defense, two-and-some-change fairly uneventful, drama-free, seemingly mentally stable years.

Well, “uneventful” might not be the best word.

Since being put under conservatorship in early 2008, there’s been a lot of “comeback” talk regarding Britney Spears. She appeared in How I Met Your Mother, which ABC called a comeback, the UK’s Daily Mail called “Womanizer” her “sizzling new comeback single” and MTV called her “the comeback kid” when she racked up three awards at the 2008 VMAs: Best Female Video, Best Pop Video, and Video of the Year award, all for “Piece of Me.”

And let’s not forget her latest Glee appearance, which was really well received and apparently broke the show’s ratings record.

Her personal life also seems to be pretty uneventful. Aside from the occasional “Is that a new tattoo?”-eqsue media attention, she’s been in what seems like a solid relationship with former agent Jason Trawick.

So, I guess what I’m having trouble wrapping my brain around is why Judge Goetz thinks she still needs the conservatorship? It’s been nearly three years.

Of course, we only know what Britney or the media report (but let’s face it – if there’s some wild drama going on, the media’s gonna be on it), so maybe there are enough behind-the-scenes issues going on to make the judge hesitant.

Or, maybe Judge Goetz is trying to ease Britney back into full control of her own life. TMZ reports that lately Britney has been making most of her financial decisions herself anyway, and at the hearing, the judge did approve “investment strategies” for Britney’s trust.

For now, all we know is that Britney Spears seems to be doing well and, even though she’s still under conservatorship, I think we can safely assume it won’t be for too much longer.

And, given how well it’s worked for Britney, perhaps a conservatorship would be beneficial for Lindsay Lohan, too? Mom Dina and manager Lou Taylor are hoping to find out."

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/celebrity/2010/10/britney-spears-conservatorship-precaution-or-excessive/