studlygeorge Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 16 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said: The thing is precisely after everything we've seen onstage and offstage from Britney, both in her personal life, her music, even MM lyrics themselves, how can anyone be surprised or think it's too much this MM video? Being naked? She already did that in Toxic, Womanizer, Criminal. "******"? Slave says hi, and it's kinda there in Slumber Party too. And I say "******" because they're not even naked, they're not even simulating ***. That "**** ***" reference at the beginning, first of all, it was done with a gay dancer, and they're supposedly filming this video within the video. Kissing the guy? That happened in Toxic, Criminal, Womanizer, the OFFICIAL Make Me... I mean, and this time is kinda humorous I understand that visually, some people don't like it, like the colors of it, or the way the shots were taken, etc, but feeling offended or scandalized about the amount of ****** content, it's the last thing I expected to hear about Britney Spears, and especially coming from her fans. And yet people still expect the original GM video to leak, and want a Blackout 2.0, like, the irony The G-Eazy scene? That's still in the official video, I mean... Half naked hot guys doing their thing? Now it results it's too much when back in the day everyone was drooling over those bts pictures, AND G-Eazy. One would think girls and gay fans would be the happiest with this, and now it ends up it's too much for their pure souls. Exactly how I feel Link to comment
Super Mods Puppy Posted April 13, 2019 Super Mods Share Posted April 13, 2019 19 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said: The thing is precisely after everything we've seen onstage and offstage from Britney, both in her personal life, her music, even MM lyrics themselves, how can anyone be surprised or think it's too much this MM video? Being naked? She already did that in Toxic, Womanizer, Criminal. "******"? Slave says hi, and it's kinda there in Slumber Party too. And I say "******" because they're not even naked, they're not even simulating ***. That "**** ***" reference at the beginning, first of all, it was done with a gay dancer, and they're supposedly filming this video within the video. Kissing the guy? That happened in Toxic, Criminal, Womanizer, the OFFICIAL Make Me... I mean, and this time is kinda humorous I understand that visually, some people don't like it, like the colors of it, or the way the shots were taken, etc, but feeling offended or scandalized about the amount of ****** content, it's the last thing I expected to hear about Britney Spears, and especially coming from her fans. And yet people still expect the original GM video to leak, and want a Blackout 2.0, like, the irony The G-Eazy scene? That's still in the official video, I mean... Half naked hot guys doing their thing? Now it results it's too much when back in the day everyone was drooling over those bts pictures, AND G-Eazy. One would think girls and gay fans would be the happiest with this, and now it ends up it's too much for their pure souls. I can’t believe people here, I’m sure if you showed the video to someone outside the fan base, sure they would think it’s weird but they would not be shocked that it’s highly ****** cuz Britney pretty much is tacky and slutty that’s why we love her, I mean we stan a chick that has a song called “oops” when they think of Britney, they think of her like she’s the fast food of music but Madonna was seen like that in the past but now they commend her for her bold choices and I believe this was it for Britney, fans ***** now but years later they would praise it like everything they do ***** first and then later feeling nostalgic and change their tone . Link to comment
Mario Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 I have been streaming glory non-stop. this video has revived its era for me. anyone else? Link to comment
ILikeChillinWithYou Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 17 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said: The thing is precisely after everything we've seen onstage and offstage from Britney, both in her personal life, her music, even MM lyrics themselves, how can anyone be surprised or think it's too much this MM video? Being naked? She already did that in Toxic, Womanizer, Criminal. "******"? Slave says hi, and it's kinda there in Slumber Party too. And I say "******" because they're not even naked, they're not even simulating ***. That "**** ***" reference at the beginning, first of all, it was done with a gay dancer, and they're supposedly filming this video within the video. Kissing the guy? That happened in Toxic, Criminal, Womanizer, the OFFICIAL Make Me... I mean, and this time is kinda humorous I understand that visually, some people don't like it, like the colors of it, or the way the shots were taken, etc, but feeling offended or scandalized about the amount of ****** content, it's the last thing I expected to hear about Britney Spears, and especially coming from her fans. And yet people still expect the original GM video to leak, and want a Blackout 2.0, like, the irony The G-Eazy scene? That's still in the official video, I mean... Half naked hot guys doing their thing? Now it results it's too much when back in the day everyone was drooling over those bts pictures, AND G-Eazy. One would think girls and gay fans would be the happiest with this, and now it ends up it's too much for their pure souls. Agree with you on all these. But MY only real problem is the red paint scene in the cage. Yes she has been naked befor in videos like Everytime, toxic, womanizer, gimme more and crminal but never has she bared her breasts. She is just completely topless in that scene. But in Criminal, she had Jason's hand, Womanizer she had her own hands, Gimme More she had her top, Toxic she used innovative angles by sitting and carefully placed diamonds and in Everytime, there was water and her hair. But complete nudity? Link to comment
balmainxcx Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 On 4/12/2019 at 7:18 PM, Ken Doll said: BRAD LOW WAS THE ONE WHO LEAKED THE MAKE ME VIDEO. He's blaming Michael Coogan as being the one who leaked it. Brad Low is one of the editors of the Make Me video and he was the original leaker back in 2016. He leaked the famous makeme_0707 on vimeo. He wants to blame him for the leak. If you look at what originally leaked, you can see his name in the Vimeo profile name as the person who originally leaked it. this is his instagram. Guys don't let this britney fan being f**ked over a leak he didn't even do please! https://www.instagram.com/bradlow/ You should remove this post. Whoever Brad Low is, he can sue you for defamation of character for your post if he wishes to do so. Link to comment
Super Mods Puppy Posted April 13, 2019 Super Mods Share Posted April 13, 2019 1 minute ago, ILikeChillinWithYou said: Agree with you on all these. But MY only real problem is the red paint scene in the cage. Yes she has been naked befor in videos like Everytime, toxic, womanizer, gimme more and crminal but never has she bared her breasts. She is just completely topless in that scene. But in Criminal, she had Jason's hand, Womanizer she had her own hands, Gimme More she had her top, Toxic she used innovative angles by sitting and carefully placed diamonds and in Everytime, there was water and her hair. But complete nudity? She did shot a take where she was completely topless for Gimme More, I remember there was a video still and you can see her nipple, I remember there was a topic on here about it, obviously the was downplayed in the final version. Link to comment
Body ache Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 I have this on repeat. The more I watch it the more I like it. It's just so perfect. Top 5 for me. Link to comment
britneymegamix Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Barajas said: GUYS WTF? HAVE ANYBODY NOTED THE WEBPAGE AT THE EVICTION NOTE IN THE VIDEO... I found the place https://www.roofcrashersandhemgrabbers.com/ seems to be a cristian blog (where there is a post about going to other life). What is MORE WEIRD... after a quick google search I actually found the digital form of the eviction note in the video.. it was uploud to a weird law forum in august 2018... but actually this image was created since 2014! I mean.. so this shows that the central concept of the video is not as deep as it seems or that... lachappele has a CRISTIAN BLOG?.. im confused! THIS IS LOOKS BOTH WEIRD AND MESSY... https://londonmedarb.com/what-does-an-eviction-notice-look-like/ https://www.roofcrashersandhemgrabbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Adam-and-Eve-eviction-notice-png.png wtf ... So? Why are you saying that is not as deep as it seems? Who cares if it was created in 2014, it doesn't mean that there's not a deep concept. Link to comment
studlygeorge Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, britneymegamix said: ... So? Why are you saying that is not as deep as it seems? Who cares if it was created in 2014, it doesn't mean that there's not a deep concept. OP is stating the video isn’t that deep because it references another piece of work....which I don’t understand. With that logic the whole Adam and Eve concept “isn’t that deep” because that derives from another piece of work lmao Link to comment
Super Mods Puppy Posted April 13, 2019 Super Mods Share Posted April 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Lukass1896 said: Yea I agree - it's the best version. Not cringey like the "official" one, but not weird and pornographic like that "scrapped" one. Exactly! It's soooooooo obvious I don't know how can somebody dovn-vote a post about that body double... It's not me or anybody else being mean - it's just a fact I'm afraid that it is somehow linked with Lou Taylor - or others weird people in Britney's "conservatorship team" They are known for being extremely religious - to the point of being weird... But it's David's video at the end of the day.. so I don't get it (Well maybe not since he said it's not his ) I knew Lou Taylor would be influential, she is open about carrying the lord’s wishes and she’s doing God’s bidding. Like if you list that as your mission then you know she’s like crazy and would be relentless to shove religion down people’s throat. Britney has made religious people very angry in the past and they all think she should burn in hell so I’m sure Lou Taylor assumes she can “ save” Britney from damnation just like what god did to mary magdalene. I met a lot of devout Christians that tries to get me to church and that god can make everything better. Link to comment
britneymegamix Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, Body ache said: I have this on repeat. The more I watch it the more I like it. It's just so perfect. Top 5 for me. Someone with good taste! It is in my top 5 as well. So artsy. Mysterious. The visuals are so "pop". It makes me think about Hollywood world. The plastic world. A shallow world. So ****. (G-Eazy is my boyfriend, he's too hot ) Except some evident things that should be edited, I like the fact that Britney's face is not edited. It would have been her most mature music video ever. Link to comment
Body ache Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, britneymegamix said: Someone with good taste! It is in my top 5 as well. So artsy. Mysterious. The visuals are so "pop". It makes me think about Hollywood world. The plastic world. A shallow world. So ****. (G-Eazy is my boyfriend, he's too hot ) Except some evident things that should be edited, I like the fact that Britney's face is not edited. It would have been her most mature music video ever. At first I kinda understood why they axed it but in the end it's just a music video and they didn't show any nudity. It was different which I liked and made Britney look so cool and likable. Only Britney could get away with this kind of music video and when she finally did it it got axed. not even madonna could get away with a video like this. She would get torn apart. At least we got to see a version of it finally. Link to comment
Oxic Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 23 minutes ago, ILikeChillinWithYou said: Agree with you on all these. But MY only real problem is the red paint scene in the cage. Yes she has been naked befor in videos like Everytime, toxic, womanizer, gimme more and crminal but never has she bared her breasts. She is just completely topless in that scene. But in Criminal, she had Jason's hand, Womanizer she had her own hands, Gimme More she had her top, Toxic she used innovative angles by sitting and carefully placed diamonds and in Everytime, there was water and her hair. But complete nudity? but it's not fully nudity tho, she has "stars" on her nipples that covered them Link to comment
Oxic Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 1 hour ago, glorified.ho said: Oh wow... so they just printed a fake eviction note from the internet and the whole Adam and Eve narrative was not actually a concept? Or maybe David actually does have a Christian blog... this just changes the whole perspective and the "concept" of the video omg yes, glad it got scrapped Link to comment
Body ache Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Oxic said: this just changes the whole perspective and the "concept" of the video omg yes, glad it got scrapped I mean maybe it fitted in his concept instead of making one. Link to comment
Alexanda Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 I saw it now! I don't think the sexthing or too much is the problem here... It looks out of place, i know it's not the final version but still... Kissing the dancer and after that having *** with G-Eazy (i guess that is what the camera-angle should show) i can not take it seriously because it looks like Britney and her gay-backupdancer in the dancingscenes, something is off there, it just doesn't make sense. Link to comment
PZHSB Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 My butthole is quivering watching it. Omg so much better than any video she’s given us in the past decade. I can understand maybe it was a bit “much” for her image. And god help her poor kids when they see it Link to comment
Richie Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 why so serious? it's a video made to cause some impact via some too explicit images. it's funny, it has a little humour, it's crazy, the concept it's not even that wild, she's playing a woman that has way too much of a ****** life with no limits whatsoever, to the point where she's ordered to leave her house so she decides to literally destroy it, yet, in the middle, she throws a tv out of the window which ends up in the pool accidentially killing *one* of her boyfriends, which she saves. it's crazy how funny it is for being so bizarre. it's so britney spears. I love it ! wish we had this one released too. She looks gorgeous (of course) and her moves are fluid and confident, not like it was meant to be a dance video anyways. maybe next time Link to comment
breathe_on_me_toxic Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 1 hour ago, chrisryan said: LOL I totally bought this back when the original low quality scene version leaked. no way haha. so cool. and i bought the shimmery eos from the randee st. video version Link to comment
Richie Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 I didn't have the chance to download it yesterday. I've seen it a couple times today on youtube but it's really LQ and the HQ ones that are still out there, have that watermark on them. Please someone help me out Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.