Cappycorn87 Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 I heard some on here say Britney not a real artist What is a real artist? Is it one if those pretentious, boring artist that takes themselves waaaaaay too seriously with boring, dry music. Link to comment
stateofgracebritney Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 well I think Britney is a real artist. No offense to others like Mariah and Celine but i like Britney much better Britney can sing, song-write, dance, act and model, if that’s not what a real artist is then idk what is a singer anymore. oh and she paints flowers in her garden as well, so she can definitely paint beautifully as well Link to comment
Avatar Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 Britney chooses to not be an artist anymore if you want to get technical. Though to be fair I feel like we havent seen any behind the scenes footage in years, so we don't know what she does now. And since she doesn't say anything in interviews about her work besides it's cool, we don't know how much involvement she has.. Link to comment
Cappycorn87 Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 8 minutes ago, Avatar said: Britney chooses to not be an artist anymore if you want to get technical. Though to be fair I feel like we havent seen any behind the scenes footage in years, so we don't know what she does now. And since she doesn't say anything in interviews about her work besides it's cool, we don't know how much involvement she has.. You obviously don't read interviews She has said how very involved she is for Glory. Link to comment
Alexa Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 To me, writing credits etc are not really relevant. We know Britney is a capable writer, but it's not what she's known for. She isn't respected artistically because she's spent the last 15 years almost exclusively lip syncing without good reason. Add to the fact she's performing in cheap lingerie and doing uninspired choreography.. it's like she's determined not to be taken seriously. What she does in the studio is one thing, but she's going to be judged mainly for her performances. Let's be honest.. what growth has there been? She was on her way to paving something different for herself, who knows, maybe even gaining some deserved respect by getting very involved with the creative process from In the Zone and then merging into what would've been The Original Doll - which is great - but all that would be for nothing if she was to do the same showgirl act she'd been doing prior. Link to comment
ralphcornio Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 12 minutes ago, Cappycorn87 said: You obviously don't read interviews She has said how very involved she is for Glory. @Avatar is right. Each time a new Britney interview comes out, I'm DYING to hear more about what she thinks about her work. It used to be much more in-depth, back in the Primeney days, but now it's all vague expressions like 'really really cool', urban, my best record yet, etc. I really wish she could talk more about what she does musically, specially with Glory, since it's such a gem Link to comment
shutup Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 someone who is involved in the process of recording music and career related decisions in general. so yes, she is one even if ppl say otherwise bc they are music snobs. even lazyney is one since she decides to do what she wants to do (hopefully). Link to comment
Content Curators Britneyarmy8 Posted January 1, 2019 Content Curators Share Posted January 1, 2019 Michael Jackson is the prime example Link to comment
Cappycorn87 Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, Alexa said: To me, writing credits etc are not really relevant. We know Britney is a capable writer, but it's not what she's known for. She isn't respected artistically because she's spent the last 15 years almost exclusively lip syncing without good reason. Add to the fact she's performing in cheap lingerie and doing uninspired choreography.. it's like she's determined not to be taken seriously. What she does in the studio is one thing, but she's going to be judged mainly for her performances. Let's be honest.. what growth has there been? She was on her way to paving something different for herself, who knows, maybe even gaining some deserved respect by getting very involved with the creative process from In the Zone and then merging into what would've been The Original Doll - which is great - but all that would be for nothing if she was to do the same showgirl act she'd been doing prior. So she's suppose to dress and and perform boring? Link to comment
Cappycorn87 Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 7 minutes ago, ralphcornio said: @Avatar is right. Each time a new Britney interview comes out, I'm DYING to hear more about what she thinks about her work. It used to be much more in-depth, back in the Primeney days, but now it's all vague expressions like 'really really cool', urban, my best record yet, etc. I really wish she could talk more about what she does musically, specially with Glory, since it's such a gem She lets the music do most of the talking and it speaks well Link to comment
Avatar Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 26 minutes ago, Cappycorn87 said: You obviously don't read interviews She has said how very involved she is for Glory. Just went to go "read" them all (there''s like 3) and they're contradicting and mostly someone speaking for her or it's other people that were involved giving tidbits. And then I watched/listened to some other ones and I'm sticking to what I originally said.. I did find it interesting that she talked about writing a lot and the producers said she wrote and they didn't give her any credits. Britneys team live in opposite world with all those Britney Jean credits and no Glory credits. Link to comment
Alexa Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, Cappycorn87 said: So she's suppose to dress and and perform boring? The fact she wore more clothes when she was 19/20 speaks for itself. I appreciate that she's proud of her body, and she's free to flaunt it on Instagram but there's a way to do it that enhances a performance - and it's not required for every song. And how exactly would you define a "boring" performance? I'm curious to know. When you're doing a watered down, tribute act version of what you were doing in your prime, it's time to re-evaluate. You just need to look at the POM show objectively and you'll see how dated and tired her performance style is. I'm hoping she brings it for Domination, but there needs to be moments where she does something different. Link to comment
Cappycorn87 Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 13 minutes ago, Avatar said: Just went to go "read" them all (there''s like 3) and they're contradicting and mostly someone speaking for her or it's other people that were involved giving tidbits. And then I watched/listened to some other ones and I'm sticking to what I originally said.. I did find it interesting that she talked about writing a lot and the producers said she wrote and they didn't give her any credits. Britneys team live in opposite world with all those Britney Jean credits and no Glory credits. She has credits on Glory Link to comment
Inherzone Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 Justin Bieber. JK. I would say: Michael Jackson, Prince, Freddie, David B... yeah kinda almost everybody from the 80s to 00s. Maybe even Eminem/Amy W. The new generation is nothing alike. Selena? Lol Cardi/Nicki? no. let alone all these "lil bla" rappers. Link to comment
Avatar Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 15 minutes ago, Cappycorn87 said: She has credits on Glory She doesn't have credits for the songs she says she co-wrote DYWCO and Clumsy. I was comparing it to Britney Jean, where she has credit for songs that we have demos of other people singing. Someone on her team isn't doing their job. Link to comment
jordeezy river red Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 Honestly... if we want to get really technical, NO mainstream puppets are "real" and IDC what y'all say.... Link to comment
pieceofphilipp Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Cappycorn87 said: You obviously don't read interviews She has said how very involved she is for Glory. Where are the behind the lyrics, the in deep talks about the music? 24 minutes ago, Cappycorn87 said: She has credits on Glory She also has credits on Britney Jean as lead singer on songs she obviously is not lead (nowhere to be found) nor has co-written anything (hence full demos of other singer surfaced). Link to comment
Cappycorn87 Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 18 minutes ago, pieceof15yearold*loveyall said: Where are the behind the lyrics, the in deep talks about the music? She also has credits on Britney Jean as lead singer on songs she obviously is not lead (nowhere to be found) nor has co-written anything (hence full demos of other singer surfaced). 1 album Link to comment
2K16NEY Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 An artist is someone who put a piece of them in their work whether it’s through writing or dance or imagery. Someone who is passionate about their work and uses it as a way to express themselves. Britney goes into a studio, records a song, leaves the studio and never talks or thinks about the song ever again. Britney talking about her music: It’s a very cool song. I like the beat. Britney’s performances are no longer art either. She dances out of rhythm and looks a mess. It’s cringe. She doesn’t care about her work nor does she use it as an outlet. She just does it because it’s her job. That is not art. Link to comment
Cappycorn87 Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, Frenchiie said: Someone that shares a message and expressions through art. That's what Britney does Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.