Us Weekly: Britney wants her c-ship to come to an end after world tour (?)

[Good4Ya]

It's none my business but I can't understand how someone who raises her children is under c-ship and "cannot make personal decisions" if that's generally applied to the incapacitated or mentally ill... I think it's unethical. But again, none of my business.

[Daxx]

I can't at people who say ''she doesn't want it to end because she's careless about taxes etc as she has people doing it for her''. Even if she wasn't in a cship she would still have people doing that stuff for her, just like most celebs

[Inherzone]

after jamie its prob. her brother.

its never ending i guess. just because she doesnt want to.

my friend was in a c-ship too, and afters 5 years she wrote a letter and got a meeting.

then after a half year she got free.

[really really cool guy]

26 minutes ago, Inherzone said:

after jamie its prob. her brother.

its never ending i guess. just because she doesnt want to.

my friend was in a c-ship too, and afters 5 years she wrote a letter and got a meeting.

then after a half year she got free.

What was his/her case?

I don't know what's Britney's mental illness but that's the main reason she's still under it. I hope it's not severe 

[Alex_1991]

3 hours ago, really really cool guy said:

I don't think she wants it to end. She would have to take care of her businesses instead of Jamie. With the c-ship she's protected from lawsuits against her (directly) and she has a lot more time to spend with her kids. And about the money I don't see it as a problem. She buys whatever she wants, travels to Hawaii and lives in a nice mansion. Besides all the money will go to her kids in the future, not Jamie.

[Sil]

2 hours ago, really really cool guy said:

Dignity? It's been 10 years since it started. She's ok with it and most people (non fans) don't even know or care about it. It works for her and that's all that matters

We have no idea if she is ok with it! All we know if that she HAS TO, liking it or not.

Britney is a (healthy) rebel since ever. I doubt she likes to have her dad as her boss at 35 yo...

[Pickle Rick]

2 hours ago, pablitonizer said:

I think the C-ship will end the moment her sons turn 18, and it still keeps on because they're still under age 

Let's not forget the c-ship was reinforced with minors being involved in Britney's situation 

I don't think so, is not 21 the age to become an adult on united States?

[Allmylife]

For people saying that it's good for Britney, in The article it says Britney wants the personal c ship to end but still wants jamie to manage her finances

[Shadow.]

10 minutes ago, Sil said:

We have no idea if she is ok with it! All we know if that she HAS TO, liking it or not.

Britney is a (healthy) rebel since ever. I doubt she likes to have her dad as her boss at 35 yo...

i can't even believe im saying this but i have to agree with really cool guy. we don't know that she's unhappy with the arrangements either but considering shes in the best shape mentally & physically and as an outsider looking in, her life seems to have improved considerably since the c-ship has been put in place, i would assume britney is happy with the arrangement. it works for everyone and if there was an issue she would have the right to argue against it, shes not a prisoner

[Allmylife]

Just now, Shadow. said:

i can't even believe im saying this but i have to agree with really cool guy. we don't know that she's unhappy with the arrangements either but considering shes in the best shape mentally & physically and as an outsider looking in, her life seems to have improved considerably since the c-ship has been put in place, i would assume britney is happy with the arrangement. it works for everyone and if there was an issue she would have the right to argue against it, shes not a prisoner

Last time britney tried to petition it they threatened to take away.her children and still can because they are still minors. 

[really really cool guy]

2 minutes ago, Shadow. said:

i can't even believe im saying this but i have to agree with really cool guy. we don't know that she's unhappy with the arrangements either but considering shes in the best shape mentally & physically and as an outsider looking in, her life seems to have improved considerably since the c-ship has been put in place, i would assume britney is happy with the arrangement. it works for everyone and if there was an issue she would have the right to argue against it, shes not a prisoner

Hi sweetie 

[Cappycorn87]

2 hours ago, ralphynno said:

This basically. I'm sure she never really fought it because of those kids. I believe that once they're 18, not only is she going to get free from it but also will quit as a performer. I'm 90% positive. This would explain tons and tons of stuff actually. Low-key, I always believed she wanted to retire / do something else after circus (a decent comeback to prove she was still ok but also very tired from showbiz and all the s--t it gave her) but they didn't let her, that's why we have FF era, and all the carried out eras later on. If this is true, then Vegas was actually the best thing that could happen to her, and y'all keep criticizing it so much

Oh yeah the FF and BJ eras where her original direction for those albums were scrapped and she had no interest in promoting what the label chose.  Glory stuck to her direction and we got an interested Britney that was excited for an album. 

[zxcvb]

47 minutes ago, Allmylife said:

For people saying that it's good for Britney, in The article it says Britney wants the personal c ship to end but still wants jamie to manage her finances

Yes. People forget that there are two conservatorships: one personal and one financial.  The later is managed by her father and lawyer Andrew Wallet.

The financial conservatorship is absolutely excellent for Britney.  People also forget that under her financial conservatorship, everything is strictly monitored.  So there is no chance anybody can abuse it.  There's really no evidence Britney is 'great' with money.

It's not a matter of people (her father) trying to get hands on her money because it's in the courts.  Every action taken is pretty much monitored.  

But her personal conservatorship is probably the one that is controlling.

[zxcvb]

2 hours ago, ralphynno said:

This basically. I'm sure she never really fought it because of those kids. I believe that once they're 18, not only is she going to get free from it but also will quit as a performer. I'm 90% positive. This would explain tons and tons of stuff actually. Low-key, I always believed she wanted to retire / do something else after circus (a decent comeback to prove she was still ok but also very tired from showbiz and all the s--t it gave her) but they didn't let her, that's why we have FF era, and all the carried out eras later on. If this is true, then Vegas was actually the best thing that could happen to her, and y'all keep criticizing it so much

I expect her next Vegas residency to be her very last performances. 

There's no doubt her financial conservatorship has made her exponentially wealthier given how monitored by the courts it is/was, only allowing for intelligent people managing her fortunes.

Given this, she doesn't need to keep performing past her early 40s (And she will still make some million from perfume sales alone.)  However, I suspect her continued performing is done to pay her team as much as anything.

[DoSomething954]

4 hours ago, PokemonSpears said:

What I've always wondered is what's gonna happen when her kids become adults. Are they gonna be free, independent citizens while Britney is still under a conservatorship? Will they eventually become her conservators, like, when Jamie passes away or something? I know there is the other lawyer too, but I guess one of the parts has to be a direct relative.

Well remember when she got engaged to Jason and he became a co-conservator or whatever? I think if she married, her husband would take over. 

[MM]

well i hope so. i can't imagine a 40 year old woman still asking her dad for permission for certain life choices.she doesn't have autonomy over her own life and doesn't even have custody of her own kids. it's sad and so obvious that it's only for her conservators and everyone involved to make money. millions of people suffer from mental illnesses and they're not under conservatorships. even the judge assigned to the case has a history of corruption. there was a website exposing her but somehow was taken down. i would hope she is finding confidence in herself to take on the struggle in trying to petition against the conservatorship. last time she did it they tried to take her kids away from her. 

[MM]

55 minutes ago, DoSomething954 said:

Well remember when she got engaged to Jason and he became a co-conservator or whatever? I think if she married, her husband would take over. 

actually now that i think about it that could be been a reason why they never married. who wants to be legally responsible for their fully grown/capable spouse? 

[MyAccountGotBanned]

If she was to take control she’d end her career ... they don’t want her to end her career cause she makes them money .

so her dad fought for her and now she has Vegas and it’s a win win for her 

[Allmylife]

14 minutes ago, Intheblue said:

If she was to take control she’d end her career ... they don’t want her to end her career cause she makes them money .

so her dad fought for her and now she has Vegas and it’s a win win for her 

No she wouldn't. The point of this is to end the personal conservatorship not the financial one. She wants her rights back 

[fnfurter]

Yeah, tbh, I'm also wondering why y'all are forgetting that there are two portions of the c-ship in place, personal and financial, and that they likely mean the personal portion.... But as for this article, I don't know. It is also true this crops up every year.