Jump to content

NW: "end of the c-ship, scrap B10 for a baby?"


joe sp

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Just gossip, but wouldn't it be lovely?

Future Hearings 

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Petition Hearing

11/08/2017 at 8:30 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Accounting Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Order to Show Cause Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Hearing

Link to comment

Hearings already held in 2017:

09/08/2017 in Probate Department 99, Penny, Brenda, Presiding
Order to Show Cause Hearing - Held - Continued

09/08/2017 in Probate Department 99, Penny, Brenda, Presiding
Motion Hearing - Held - Continued

09/08/2017 in Probate Department 99, Penny, Brenda, Presiding
Motion Hearing - Held - Continued

04/25/2017 in Probate Department 99, Penny, Brenda, Presiding
Petition Hearing - Held

04/13/2017 in Probate Department 99, Penny, Brenda, Presiding
Petition Hearing - Held - Continued

02/22/2017 in Probate Department 99, Penny, Brenda, Presiding
Court Order Hearing - Held

01/30/2017 in Probate Department 99, Penny, Brenda, Presiding
Petition Hearing - Held - Continued

Link to comment
29 minutes ago, Steel Magnolia said:

Just gossip, but wouldn't it be lovely?

Future Hearings 

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Petition Hearing

11/08/2017 at 8:30 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Accounting Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Order to Show Cause Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Hearing

11/08/2017 at 10:00 AM in Probate Department 99 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion Hearing

What do these even mean?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Crayboy said:

What do these even mean?

They're entries from the California court system. They show upcoming dates for Britney's conservatorship hearings. 

I don't know what each individual entry means. Only the judge, her two conservators, their lawyers, and Britney's court-appointed lawyer would know the contents. And Britney, if her court-appointed lawyer is actually filling her in like he's mandated to do.

Link to comment

why would she have to retire though, even if she has another baby? :wtfdidusay:

she was fine when she had the other two, even recorded an album while pregnant. Didn't Janet Jackson just had a baby, at 50 years old,  like two days ago and is already on tour? 

I know she's Britney Spears, but for example here in Mexico we have several pop singers that have kept performing while pregnant, until just a few weeks before giving birth, and went back on tour two months later. It's become almost a trend now :gimmemoar:

Even if she didn't perform live again, having a baby doesn't stop her from recording and releasing music. Even shooting a videoclip would be fine. I'll never understand the obsession that all of you have with Britney retiring. If you don't wanna see her "ruining her legacy" just stop following her, it won't be hard for you. There are still many fans that will always want something new from her, whatever it is.

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, PokemonSpears said:

why would she have to retire though, even if she has another baby? :wtfdidusay:

she was fine when she had the other two, even recorded an album while pregnant. Didn't Janet Jackson just had a baby, at 50 years old,  like two days ago and is already on tour? 

I know she's Britney Spears, but for example here in Mexico we have several pop singers that have kept performing while pregnant, until just a few weeks before giving birth, and went back on tour two months later. It's become almost a trend now :gimmemoar:

Even if she didn't perform live again, having a baby doesn't stop her from recording and releasing music. Even shooting a videoclip would be fine. I'll never understand the obsession that all of you have with Britney retiring. If you don't wanna see her "ruining her legacy" just stop following her, it won't be hard for you. There are still many fans that will always want something new from her, whatever it is.

The problem is: Britney barely perform while she is not pregnant, so imagine if she gets pregnant 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

We noticed you're using an ad blocker  :ehum_britney_um_unsure_confused_what:

Thanks for visiting Exhale! Your support is greatly appreciated 💜  

Exhale survives through advertising revenue. Please, disable your ad block extension to help us and continue browsing Exhale. 🙏

I've disabled ad block