fnfurter Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 55 minutes ago, BoyToySoldier said: With bad or average performances. And barely discussing Glory over POM, which was what mostly got promoted. Link to comment
Godney'sSweetCheeks Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Is he "outgoing" because of our Make Me petition from over a year ago? Link to comment
CJMCH Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 you had one job... TBH I'm not mad at the Glory cover, I actually like it. My problem is the booklet, as fans, some of us could do something better using captures and/or stills. Even BJ had a beautiful booklet. This era was good for me except for 2 little (big) things: Make Me scrapped video/Make Me VMA performance/ Link to comment
Pinky98 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 18 hours ago, The Greatest Show said: People who say shook or shooketh or anything like it sound ********. That word needs to die. Have fun being a Stan Link to comment
BrittonJeanSpears Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 19 hours ago, CashmereCat said: Stop being a poosi and tell Britney to work harder for her dumped career. Dumped? More like buried. Link to comment
troubleguy Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 why don't you do somethin Link to comment
ICouldntThinkOfOne Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 On 11/2/2017 at 1:23 AM, danny1994 said: That was funny **** performance, **** outfit Same **** POM show she always does, promoting Vegas and not the album Standard album promo, very easy to do Mini version of her **** POM show she always does, and once again promoting Vegas and not the album And I’ll add one more thing, she did Caroool Karaoke but she barely sang over the playback. She lipsynced Toxic completely and mimed 90% of the other songs When we people realise that, although some performers do use these shows to perform their art, for the most part they're viewed as exposure and press, and to sell whatever you're putting out there, there needs to be investment to make people WANT to buy something. Britney might have have it a perfect promo list when its summarised, but there's a reason why it had little effect, and its because nothing was really that good or enough to sell the album. @Capricorn87 Link to comment
Cappycorn87 Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 6 minutes ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said: When we people realise that, although some performers do use these shows to perform their art, for the most part they're viewed as exposure and press, and to sell whatever you're putting out there, there needs to be investment to make people WANT to buy something. Britney might have have it a perfect promo list when its summarised, but there's a reason why it had little effect, and its because nothing was really that good or enough to sell the album. @Capricorn87 The night of the VMA's, Make Me was #3 on itunes and moved up 1 spot #2 after her performance, would have been #1 again if that CLOSER song was not out at the time Make Me seen an increase on itunes after her Jimmy Kimmel appearance People loved what they heard as you can see and went bought the music Link to comment
Anti-Hero Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 10 minutes ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said: When we people realise that, although some performers do use these shows to perform their art, for the most part they're viewed as exposure and press, and to sell whatever you're putting out there, there needs to be investment to make people WANT to buy something. Britney might have have it a perfect promo list when its summarised, but there's a reason why it had little effect, and its because nothing was really that good or enough to sell the album. @Capricorn87 Perfectly said. She did a ton of promo, but when you lipsync and tap your knee on the today show, people aren’t going to take you seriously. Link to comment
Anti-Hero Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Cappycorn87 said: The night of the VMA's, Make Me was #3 on itunes and moved up 1 spot #2 after her performance, would have been #1 again if that CLOSER song was not out at the time Make Me seen an increase on itunes after her Jimmy Kimmel appearance People loved what they heard as you can see and went bought the music Make Me had a discount and it fell like a rock a week after the VMAs. And it only went gold, barely Link to comment
Cappycorn87 Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Just now, danny1994 said: Perfectly said. She did a ton of promo, but when you lipsync and tap your knee on the today show, people aren’t going to take you seriously. but they take Taylor Swift and Rihanna seriously and they are both horrible performers Link to comment
BoyToySoldier Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Cappycorn87 said: but they take Taylor Swift and Rihanna seriously and they are both horrible performers Because that's their limit. Britney is a shell of the performer she once was. This is why The Army and pop music fans in general are up in arms about her performances. Because we know she's capable of more. Nobody cares if Taylor Swift or Rihanna barely dance because they were never known for dancing or show stopping performances. Get it? Link to comment
ICouldntThinkOfOne Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Cappycorn87 said: The night of the VMA's, Make Me was #3 on itunes and moved up 1 spot #2 after her performance, would have been #1 again if that CLOSER song was not out at the time Make Me seen an increase on itunes after her Jimmy Kimmel appearance People loved what they heard as you can see and went bought the music Where did it chart on Billboard though? Make Me was a moderately successful single, at best, but the hype was on Britney's return to the VMA's: the hyped it with 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003 and 2007 references: the performance itself was met with mixed reactions. If they had invested that would've helped it more. She climbed on his bed, why didn't she perform it if her and her team recognise that its a big platform? and how much was the increase in sales? Make Me and Glory had the potential to be number ones, IF her team planned everything right: they didn't, and the stuff they did plan, they barely paid attention too, which is why we got POM 2.0 everywhere, and not performances of Glory tracks: so they could be as lazy as possible, not rehearse or buy new props. As much as I stan Britney,, we can't pretend that the promotion they did was enough just because she actually turned up. Link to comment
Anti-Hero Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, Cappycorn87 said: but they take Taylor Swift and Rihanna seriously and they are both horrible performers You can’t really compare them to Britney, that’s like comparing Michael Jackson to George Michael. One’s a singer, the other is a performer. Link to comment
ICouldntThinkOfOne Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 7 minutes ago, danny1994 said: Perfectly said. She did a ton of promo, but when you lipsync and tap your knee on the today show, people aren’t going to take you seriously. If she even lipsynced to something she had recorded a month earlier, people might have! I genuinely don't understand why they use her album vocals (one of the biggest reasons she's never credited as an artist), and not her rawer takes of songs (like other popstars use). Link to comment
Anti-Hero Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said: If she even lipsynced to something she had recorded a month earlier, people might have! I genuinely don't understand why they use her album vocals (one of the biggest reasons she's never credited as an artist), and not her rawer takes of songs (like other popstars use). They should take the leaked toxic vocals, clean them up a bit, and use them for POM. I’m sure they have a treasure trove of raw vocals they can use for her live performances Link to comment
Chaoscontrol Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, ICouldntThinkOfOne said: If she even lipsynced to something she had recorded a month earlier, people might have! I genuinely don't understand why they use her album vocals (one of the biggest reasons she's never credited as an artist), and not her rawer takes of songs (like other popstars use). Probably because it would take more time to edit/cut them, so it's just easier with how they do it :/ I agree though, it doesn't make sense Link to comment
Anti-Hero Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Chaoscontrol said: Probably because it would take more time to edit/cut them, so it's just easier with how they do it :/ I agree though, it doesn't make sense I always look back to the SNL performance of Boys. It uses pre-recorded vocals, and it was the only time they were ever used so that means she recorded it specifically for this one performance. It was executed so well- Link to comment
Chaoscontrol Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 5 minutes ago, danny1994 said: I always look back to the SNL performance of Boys. It uses pre-recorded vocals, and it was the only time they were ever used so that means she recorded it specifically for this one performance. It was executed so well- Yeah, it's just dumb that they don't use them honestly. They did for FF tour if I recall correctly, so why they didn't for POM is beyond me Link to comment
Britney's Blackout Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Clearly, we didn't shake them enough. We need to shake them more so they could start leaking/releasing stuff. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.