Choreo: Britney should work smarter, not harder.

[indyRS]

In many performances of back in the early 2000's, her dancing was on point and amazing. But with one like 'Boom Boom' ABC special performance, she didn't really go all out dancing for that.

Her choreo there were somewhat more simple but executed very well. So who ever choreographed that performance, knew what they were doing 

Give her moves that aren't too difficult, but can be easily pulled off in sync and flow well.

Of course Britney needs to not be as stiff and ridgeted with her arms. More fluid.

[Puppy]

Very true, she needs a big confidence boost but she's getting there, slowly coming out of her shell.

[redacted statement]

(DELUSION INTENSIFIES) She had more stage presence while singing "Something to Talk About" than any performance in like 10 years, which says a lot, since she practically didn't dance in that.

 

Thanks for the blurry **** in your avatar btw. 

[TaylorMB]

11 minutes ago, I Always Sing Live said:

Thanks for the blurry **** in your avatar btw. 

[prettylittleliar_2214]

Exactly her moves need to be natural and everything else will flow. Constantly moving like a spazzing cockroach doesn't look good. 

[BoyToySoldier]

I'll agree with this. I think a simpler choreo would work but only if it had that Britney flair that requires her to move her body along the stage, not just stand in one place and swish her neck / flail her arms around. That's tragic.

[SexyJeans]

I feel she's just tired of dancing for 20 years 

[portrait]

1 hour ago, SexyJeans said:

I feel she's just tired of dancing for 20 years 

she's not! She's a passionate dancer! 

[CristMont]

Yas ***** preach it 

[3IsACharm33]

Britney dont care even if she had good coregraphy she wouldnt do it right and would eventually remove it

[Hope]

2 hours ago, indyRS said:

In many performances of back in the early 2000's, her dancing was on point and amazing. But with one like 'Boom Boom' ABC special performance, she didn't really go all out dancing for that.

Her choreo there were somewhat more simple but executed very well. So who ever choreographed that performance, knew what they were doing 

Give her moves that aren't too difficult, but can be easily pulled off in sync and flow well.

Of course Britney needs to not be as stiff and ridgeted with her arms. More fluid.

I agree. But fluidity comes with practice, and she gets easily bored with rehearsals, so... 

[Streets]

Touch of My Hand and Breathe On Me are two of the best performances of POM - the choreographies suit her and are fluid and not challenging

[indyRS]

2 hours ago, I Always Sing Live said:

(DELUSION INTENSIFIES) She had more stage presence while singing "Something to Talk About" than any performance in like 10 years, which says a lot, since she practically didn't dance in that.

 

Thanks for the blurry **** in your avatar btw. 

Hahaha! My **** doesn't even show in the full picture. I just have the bottom plurred for dramatic effect... Aha

[Truthings]

2 hours ago, SexyJeans said:

I feel she's just tired of dancing for 20 years 

Well she hasn't danced properly in half of them, what we have now can't be called "dancing" more like a zumba routine...

[BritLOVER]

True. Plus simple moves along with doing the same moves as backup dancers really makes a performance look well!!

[Ryan Godspeed]

yeah. Anticipating in DWADT has very simple choreo yet it seems spectacular if you execute it well.