MTV does not care about Britney and never will!

[jamesedward94]

In 2004 Britney lost Best Female Video for Toxic to Beyoncé's Naughty Girl......

THEN in 2011 they had to nerve to make Britney's Michael Jackson Video Vangurd Award speech an introduction to Beyoncé's performance which got more attention because she announced her pregnancy. Britney's tribute was short, pathetic, and embarrassing. 

AND THEN for her 2016 VMA performance they put her right after Beyoncé's 10 minute medley........

They didn't even give her a VMA until after her breakdown and it was for one of her worst music videos. No video for Baby, Oops!, Slave, OR Toxic.

But THREE for Piece of Me. 

 

MTV does NOT care about Britney! They have only used her for ratings, but never gave her the awards she truly deserves. They treat her like crap and give Beyoncé all of the attention, bowing down to her like she is the second coming of Christ.

Well I know who I will always worship.....

 

GODNEY.

 

#VMASAREOVERPARTY

[Cappycorn87]

You care about it more than Britney does 

[Guest]

Ok but Ttwe worst??  Wtf?  

[Guest Edge Of Clockin' You]

What you said is true. She has been snubbed for years and her only getting the Vanguard Award in 2011 was ridiculous. She should've received no later than 2007. No one that has received it since then is as big (OVERALL) as she was in 2011 after 7 eras of huge success. But that's everyone/everything in the industry works.

[jamesedward94]

9 minutes ago, Godllory said:

Ok but Ttwe worst??  Wtf?  

I meant Piece of Me......

But honestly, TTWE isn't that great either. She wasn't herself and was drugged too much then. What saved it was the production and editing and the amazing director. She definitely was not feeling it during that shoot!

[Inherzone]

she paid for the piece of me awards.....

[jamesedward94]

1 minute ago, Inherzone said:

she paid for the piece of me awards.....

How do you know? The public loves a good redemption story and there was a lot a publicity about her coming back so I'm pretty sure she probably got the votes to win those awards fair and square. 

[Anti-Hero]

Toxic should’ve won best pop video in 2004. But I think they got it right giving Hey Ya video of the year, it was a huge hit.

As for 2016, that’s mostly Britney’s fault.

[ShowdownITZ]

4 minutes ago, danny1994 said:

But I think they got it right giving Hey Ya video of the year, it was a huge hit

So was Toxic tho right?

[jamesedward94]

12 hours ago, danny1994 said:

Toxic should’ve won best pop video in 2004. But I think they got it right giving Hey Ya video of the year, it was a huge hit.

As for 2016, that’s mostly Britney’s fault.

It's Britney's fault they put her after Beyoncé's 10 minute medley? 

[ShowdownITZ]

Just now, jamesedward94 said:

Is Britney's fault they put her after Beyoncé's 10 minute medley? 

It was her fault for giving us a lackluster performance 

[jamesedward94]

Just now, ShowdownITZ said:

It was her fault for giving us a lackluster performance 

Britney's performance wasn't lackluster, she just didn't perform like she used to. She had energy, they just needed a better creative vision for the performance. It was easily better than most of the boring performances on the show these days. 

[Anti-Hero]

Just now, ShowdownITZ said:

So was Toxic tho right?

Toxic was more successful worldwide, but Hey Ya had a lot more impact in the United States. It finished #8 on the 2004 year-end billboard chart while Toxic finished #48.

[ShowdownITZ]

2 minutes ago, jamesedward94 said:

It was easily better than most of the boring performances on the show these days. 

I agree with you there 

[Guest Edge Of Clockin' You]

26 minutes ago, Inherzone said:

she paid for the piece of me awards.....

Nope. MTV wanted the buzz from the comeback. It would make more sense for Britney to pay for good videos to get awards not POM's video. 

[Anti-Hero]

5 minutes ago, jamesedward94 said:

Is Britney's fault they put her after Beyoncé's 10 minute medley? 

It’s Britney’s fault that she couldn’t give a performance close to 2000/2001, both 4 minute performances and more iconic than Beyoncé’s medley.

[Guest Edge Of Clockin' You]

6 minutes ago, jamesedward94 said:

Britney's performance wasn't lackluster, she just didn't perform like she used to. She had energy, they just needed a better creative vision for the performance. It was easily better than most of the boring performances on the show these days. 

Let's face reality, the performance WAS lackluster, now join lackluster + lazy singer + after beyonce = overshadowing at its best.

[jamesedward94]

Just now, ShowdownITZ said:

I agree with you there 

I think we ALL just expected more from the performance with it being her return after so long and her being the QUEEN of the VMAs. And they hyped it up SO much with that promotional video. I honestly think I like the 2007 performance more. It has become iconic in a way. The 2016 performance was good but forgettable.

[jamesedward94]

2 minutes ago, danny1994 said:

It’s Britney’s fault that she couldn’t give a performance close to 2000/2001, both 4 minute performances and more iconic than Beyoncé’s medley.

Wish she had performed the BBMAs medley at the VMAs instead. It would've been even better! That medley was more entertaining than both of Beyoncé's.

But oh well.....

[Cappycorn87]

2 minutes ago, Edge Of Leaving said:

Let's face reality, the performance WAS lackluster, now join lackluster + lazy singer + after beyonce = overshadowing at its best.

While Make Me moved up 1 spot to #2 on itunes after the performance

Could have been #1 again if that Closer song was not performed that night