BoyToySoldier Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, Dynasty said: thats somewhat true but they were still the ones who decided to put britney after beyonces 30 minute long mini concert KNOWING britneys performance is mediocre as **** and wont be able to follow That's not MTV's fault tho Britney shouldn't have had a mediocre performance, period Link to comment
Britneyqueenslays Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 considering her and madonna are the queens of vmas can't say I'm surprised they did the most iconic things on the vmas Link to comment
Anti-Hero Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 11 minutes ago, Shadow. said: Britney herself decided not to shine when she put on that tragic *** performance, lets not blame others She thought she could shine with a curtain, lamp, and her zebra dancers People keep blaming Beyoncé Link to comment
really really cool guy Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, Shadow. said: She could've used those 3 mins to create another iconic performance I know that leotard was tragic and practically destroyed the whole thing (yes I blame the leotard) but putting Beyonce's 14 minute performance RIGHT AFTER HER was not cool...it wouldn't matter if she danced like primeney again in those 3 minutes because all the attention was for Beyonce. and it's a shame that she demanded to win video of the year to perform there. there are receipts Link to comment
Daxx Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 1 minute ago, InesBrasil said: Brit better not perform or even appear, because this vma is gonna be a massive FLOP... It's in the same day as the Game of Thrones season finale so... whos gonna watch the VMA!?!? OMG really? What a mess Link to comment
Pabllo Vittar Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, Daxx said: OMG really? What a mess IKR!! They want to flop so hard Link to comment
Brat Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, BoyToySoldier said: That's not MTV's fault tho Britney shouldn't have had a mediocre performance, period It started off really cool, but Make Me isn't a good performance song (unless you're doing acrobatics like P!nk) It should've been DYWCO- would've been much more fun Link to comment
taystee Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 tbh they should make up an award for her. it's the least they could do considering they constantly slept on her until 2008. Link to comment
pablitonizer Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Of course they would show the snake, it's one of the most iconic performances in that flop award VMAs are so irrelevant that nobody cares about their commercials or actual show anymore, so they can use it Link to comment
BoyToySoldier Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, Jacod2017 said: It started off really cool, but Make Me isn't a good performance song (unless you're doing acrobatics like P!nk) It should've been DYWCO- would've been much more fun That choreo is also tragic tho Link to comment
Shadow. Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, really really cool guy said: I know that leotard was tragic and practically destroyed the whole thing (yes I blame the leotard) but putting Beyonce's 14 minute performance RIGHT AFTER HER was not cool...it wouldn't matter if she danced like primeney again in those 3 minutes because all the attention was for Beyonce. and it's a shame that she demanded to win video of the year to perform there. there are receipts The leotard wasn't to blame tho also britney's 3 mins could've outshone beyonce's 14 mins the length of the performance isn't an excuse. Britney's 00/01 vma's were better than the 14 mins beyonce did imo Link to comment
Shadow. Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 20 minutes ago, Dynasty said: thats somewhat true but they were still the ones who decided to put britney after beyonces 30 minute long mini concert KNOWING britneys performance is mediocre as **** and wont be able to follow 3 minutes ago, Shadow. said: britney's 3 mins could've outshone beyonce's 14 mins the length of the performance isn't an excuse. Britney's 00/01 vma's were better than the 14 mins beyonce did imo Link to comment
Alleyesonus_ Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 I still can't get over last years vma performance. I mean what are they thinking, she's basically the queen of the VMAs and they give us THAT performance. Plus we had been waiting for almost 10 years. And they give us THAT! I just can't The commercial was more exciting and Iconic than her performance and that's just sad I was so hyped Link to comment
fnfurter Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Didn't they hear? She thinks that performance is stupid now. Anyway, this is just baiting for ratings. I pass. Link to comment
Britneylandia Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 That's because the slave performance is the most iconic performance of the vma's EVER. Link to comment
CristMont Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 **** YOU MTV I'M DONE WITHCHU Link to comment
ohoney Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 If she or BTS is not perfoming i'm not wasting my time in watching that mess, VMA's became SO boring to me. Link to comment
Noname2022 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Siwon said: omg new single at the vma's confirmed Hide contents baby make me oooh That gif still kills me Everytime I (try to fly) see it Link to comment
xzede25 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Britneya nd Madonna reunietd for Britney's 20th year in the industry of course Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.