i hate how in the GLORY booklet, they keep hiding britneys face with those damn lights

[Campy]

theres fanmade covers who are better than that

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

 

Spoiler

and a thousand others.

i also hate the pictures, the font, and all of the visual aspect of it.

The music is flawless tho

[none]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

 

 

[Urbanney]

 

[Toxic.Latin]

Her team should hire us ASAP and stop working with people that doesn't treat her like the queen of pop and makes awful decisions tbh.

[BOBIBCFBG]

those covers all suck but yes the Booklet is a disaster 

[alexdaily]

I hate it too it looks so cheap 

[radar89]

Those fan made pictures are literally leaps and bounds better than these coffe stained booklet  

[radar89]

1 hour ago, Urbanney said:

 

These two can literally be the best cover of Brit's album 

[Million Billion]

What booklet? There's no booklet 

Oh, you mean the Youtube screen captures 

They could have at least chosen a good ones or do proper photoshoot with that same outfit, background in different angles, positions, lightining, etc. But no, it didnt work for Larry. 

[MissSpearsSaysSo]

I'm pretty happy with the booklet and packaging. It's always nice to have something cool to go along with it, but I'm happy that the music speaks for itself this time around. 

[ManOnTheM00n]

I think the pink colors on the cover and the facial expression she's making sums up Glory and the vibe of it etc..   it matches with the music imo

[Tetris]

 

These three are good. The others are not. However, the first is a little too extreme in artistic design and not pop/commercial enough because it doesn't show her face. The second just isn't the best photo of her because her face looks weird. 

The third is pretty ******* flawless.

 

[PARKBOM]

The cover that we already got for GLORY is FLAWLESS 

Captures her perfect enhanced beauty perfectly 

[e_ffen]

I agree. I don't  understand what's with the overexposure/lighting (?), I mean she looks great! They could have been so much better. 

[lustwecantcontrol]

The Glory cover doesn't bother me so much, I get the blurry/washed out thing.....it's like she's in the sun, she has light beaming down on her.....kinda fits the title. I've actually never really cared that much about album art and with the decline of physical album sales I think record labels are going to start putting less and less effort into album booklets! I'm sure in another 10 or so years physical albums will no longer be a thing. 

 

[Puppy]

Can we just get over it? It's not the worst cover but it's not the best cover, it's just okay. At least it matches with the title, glad some of you guys aren't the designers because the V shoot (although awesome) won't match. She should've use more shots from Make Me single cover, everything is great about it and would be completely different. 

I don't see people hating on the circus cover like they did when it was first released because it looked like she had a ****** armpit, she's overly photoshopped and the tacky stars but of course exhale would ***** about the current thing and then later on pretend like they've always loved it or brush it off like it never happened just like how everyone thought the circus era was P-E-R-F-E-C-T.

[Guest]

6 hours ago, Dark.Knight said:

  Hide contents

  Hide contents

  Hide contents

 

 

They look way more professional!! What they were really thinking with all this bright lighting? Britney's beauty shines even brighter without it! She didn't need it! 

[Mayenaise]

6 hours ago, Urbanney said:

 

Omfg WHYYYYYYY 

[idkidk25]

4 hours ago, Tetris said:

 

These three are good. The others are not. However, the first is a little too extreme in artistic design and not pop/commercial enough because it doesn't show her face. The second just isn't the best photo of her because her face looks weird. 

The third is pretty ******* flawless.

 

Agree with the third one it's so beautiful omfg

[Wouszz]

5 hours ago, Tetris said:

 

 

 

YAASS ***** YASS!! SLAYYYY