Andrew338 Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 She would have looked like this and probably would have killed the choreo Link to comment
BoyToySoldier Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 That weave and outfit still look cheap as **** though. Link to comment
Paulino999 Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, BoyToySoldier said: That weave and outfit still look cheap as **** though. Actually it's not a weave its her hair with extensions Link to comment
Lou M. Taylor Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Lord have mercy. That doesn't look good. Link to comment
tsss Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 if only she had better hair she would look flawless Link to comment
BoyToySoldier Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, Paulino999 said: Actually it's not a weave its her hair with extensions That's just a classy way of saying weave. Link to comment
Urbanney Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 She looked amazing without any Photoshop or editing, idc what anyone says. Anyone who thought she was fat was ******* drunk. Was she at her peak fitness? No, but she still looked amazing. Link to comment
Soni Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 2007 performance wasn't even that bad tbh...... Link to comment
DoSomething954 Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 I don't get the thread. You think the same performance would have happened in 2002 with better choreography? What song would she have performed? I think the Britney of 2002 wouldn't have even signed off on a performance like 2007 (choreo, set-up, nothing) Link to comment
Guest Halaut7 Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 15 minutes ago, BoyToySoldier said: That's just a classy way of saying weave. yep, weave also refers when the hair is woven into the hair, but it is the pretty much the same as extensions. Link to comment
DJSLAYZEE Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 Did you really take the time to PhotoShop that? Makes her head look to big for her body Link to comment
breaktheiceofmrv Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 She looked great in 2007! She was insanely ****.No one could ever! Link to comment
RAITEI Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 I am a fan of this perfomance, I remember I was a kid in 2007 and she appeared on TV my mother said: Oh she is crazy how she is going to the TV in panties while I was like: Woooh who is she. 10 years from that and the only thing I can say of this is that she looked like a beautiful Goddess and I became a fan with it. Link to comment
Michaelgiftos Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 at all u guys who say the FFT is horrible but this performance isn't that bad. Link to comment
colormefresh Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 The choreo was trash. Primeney wouldn't have been able to make it look good. Link to comment
Connor Walsh Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 3 minutes ago, Michaelgiftos said: at all u guys who say the FFT is horrible but this performance isn't that bad. Where's the lie tho? Link to comment
Connor Walsh Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 1 hour ago, BoyToySoldier said: That weave and outfit still look cheap as **** though. I agree for the weave but i don't think the outfit was bad. It looks hot. Doesn't look like cheap lingerie to me but expensive I wish someone would edit this outfit on currentney it would slay! Link to comment
Nina Dobrev Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 27 minutes ago, JustLikeMe said: This actually looks fab. Link to comment
Michaelgiftos Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, Connor Walsh said: Where's the lie tho? What lie dahling Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.