Alexia Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 RCA, which stated the video "is not a suitable representation of the song." http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/watch-britney-spears-steamy-make-me-video-w433109 Link to comment
Kiey Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 So RCA is the one scrapping it Link to comment
Margaery Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 They're making assumptions, they don't know ****, just like E! or tmz or any other magazine. Only RCA can tell. Link to comment
bg1188 Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 No wonder Britney took a trip to Hawaii. She had to film two music videos for the same song because of her label? More work she's had to do in years. Not surprised she was like ehh **** it Link to comment
Widowmaker Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Why are all the magazines saying a different thing? Link to comment
Alexia Posted August 6, 2016 Author Share Posted August 6, 2016 It seems like they're quoting them... Link to comment
PRIVATE.SHOW Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 They're quoting the petition tho Link to comment
Legend Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 This was AP a million times and Rolling Stone is getting their source from the online petition that wanted the original video Link to comment
NiceSpears Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Rolling Stone is reliable in the first place, and it looks like they're quoting RCA. This should be put up on the main site! Especially if it's true and people have been attacking Britney over this. Link to comment
reVolution Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 No wonder, they did the same with Perfume Think about it guys, Britney is not that stupid to film herself naked in body paint, if she didnt want it Link to comment
IUSM Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 I think RCA is trying to do some damage control. But I doubt they are the ones who decided to cancel the release of the original video. They are money makers and they would never throw away $2,000,000 like Team Britney just did! Link to comment
Legend Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 3 minutes ago, NiceSpears said: Rolling Stone is reliable in the first place, and it looks like they're quoting RCA. This should be put up on the main site! Especially if it's true and people have been attacking Britney over this. Rolling Stone is quoting the online petition that wanted the ORIGINAL VIDEO. RCA HASNT SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE VIDEO. We don't know who's mess this is. Link to comment
Guest ErJ Spears Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 She was the Queen of Jive Records, they literally promoted her everywhere, more than anyone else.. This new label sucks! Link to comment
LasagnaDelRey Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 EVERYONE KEEPS POSTING THE QUOTE FROM THE PETITION!! They have no sources and clearly don't know **** (like the rest of us) Link to comment
Camilo Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 4 minutes ago, If U Seek Me said: I think RCA is trying to do some damage control. But I doubt they are the ones who decided to cancel the release of the original video. They are money makers and they would never throw away $2,000,000 like Team Britney just did! Interscope canceled DWUW tho Link to comment
AndrejBLV Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Britney team should know that it's not problem that we did not get original video, the problem is that we got shitty/cheap/Hana Montana video. Link to comment
IUSM Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Just now, Camilo said: Interscope canceled DWUW tho Two presumed rapists in the music video, though. It was way messier than this video. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.